Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by Victor Round, Honorary Secretary, The Coroners' Society of England and Wales

INITIAL RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT CORONERS BILL 2006

  We welcome the publication of the draft Coroners' Bill. We believe that this provides a foundation upon which to develop a modern coroners' service. The draft Bill, which has taken on board many of our concerns, gives us a framework to work with. On the credit side it recognises that coroners need adequate powers to carry out investigations, and to obtain evidence.

  Coroners have served our society since 1194. The last major reform of the coroners jurisdiction was in 1887 (there was some reform in 1926). There has been much analysis of the coroners system over the years, but even so the system has been neglected. Nevertheless we do whatever we can to provide a personal, sympathetic and independent service in our neighbourhoods. Our jurisdictions are local judicial services, relying on the infrastructure and resources available from the local authority. There has been little national guidance and support.

  Over many years, but particularly in the past six years or so, the coroners' services have become blighted. Some local authorities and police authorities have not made adequate provision for a coroner's service and as a result many coroners are working with inadequate court facilities, offices and support. Some authorities have, however fully recognised their responsibility and the importance of the coroner's work to the local community. It is not surprising that there is a perception of a postcode lottery as to resources available to coroners: effectively it exists.

  The importance of the coroners' work is that we support the bereaved and all affected by sudden or unnatural death by searching for the true circumstances of what has happened. This is for the benefit of society and the bereaved.

  The draft Bill retains local ties in that local authorities will still fund the service, and will have to provide accommodation. Nevertheless it must be recognized that the reduced number of jurisdictions will reduce the present local nature of the service delivery.

  We welcome national leadership through a Chief Coroner.

  The regulations and practice directions under the future Act will be Informed through advice from the Coronial Advisory Council. This is most helpful, as it will build on experience and keep moving the service forwards.

  The Bill provides for a right of appeal to the Chief Coroner. It was always unfair that challenge could only be made through expensive applications to the High Court but the new appeal system must be efficient, affordable and expeditious. The fast track appeals system has merits but we worry that it has not been thought through fully and may have immense resource implications that have not been accounted for.

  Under the present system most coroners are part-time. Whilst they are available to carry out coronial duties at all times, in between the demands of the coroners responsibility, they work (mainly) as solicitors. In many jurisdictions their legal practices subsidise the coroner's service. Part-time coroners have provided excellent public service over many centuries. The Bill enables us to retain their invaluable experience and expertise.

  Careful transitional arrangements will be very important to ensure that a service continues while the new infrastructure is developed. These arrangements must ensure that the experienced coroners and their staff are encouraged to remain at their posts rather than seeking work elsewhere. The service has been neglected and blighted for too long and now is the time to invest and build.

  The Importance of Coroner's Officers in all this is still not adequately recognised. They are at the front line of bereavement care; they must have a proper career structure and access to training and continuing education. The new powers of investigation will be of little use if the investigators are not trained. The Chief Coroner will set standards but it is for local authorities and police authorities to ensure those standards are achievable, by preceding to resource them.

  The Society would like to acknowledge the enthusiasm and hard, work of Paul Goggins MP, Robert Clifford and Judith Cooke and their staff at the Home Office before the transfer to the DCA. The work they oversaw has underpinned the recent work of the DCA.

  This draft Bill has been long awaited and now it has arrived the work starts. The crucial workings and plans will be detailed in the Rules, Regulations and Practice directions but we congratulate the Minister and the team in the DCA Coroners Division for laying these foundations for the future.

  The fine details still have to be decided. The Bill's broad brush approach gives us something to work with and we will do our best to achieve an efficient, effective and humane system, which seeks the truth, and allays fears.

  But everything will depend on resources, It is a big but ...

Victor Round

Hon Secretary

The Coroners' Society of England and Wales

June 2006






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 1 December 2006