Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Seventh Report


2  First year of FOI implementation

5. The Information Commissioner estimated that between 100,000 and 130,000 requests had been made under the Act during 2005. There is no single count of the total number of requests made throughout the public sector, but for example DCA statistics show that around 38,000 requests were received by central government departments.[2] Local authorities indicated that they had received around 70,000 requests and the police service around 21,000.[3]

6. Research commissioned by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) showed that the types of information requested most frequently under FOI included statistics about the organisation, information about the decisions it made and spending and contract details.[4] Snapshots of media coverage generated by FOI and given to us by the ICO contained references to hundreds of media articles illustrating the breadth and volume of information released in 2005. Examples included:

  • Percentages required for school and university exam pass grades;
  • Hygiene reports for restaurants, hotels and school kitchens;
  • Detail on progress towards Government efficiency targets, including the number of redundancies made since the cost-cutting drive was launched;
  • Information about events leading to faulty TB vaccines being given to nearly one million children;
  • Comparative regional figures for knife and alcohol related crime; and,
  • Public authority spending on consultants' fees.

7. The Information Commissioner told us that in his view FOI was working and that the FOI Act had made a significant impact across the whole of the public sector:

    large numbers of requests are being made and I find it very reassuring that the majority are coming from members of the public. It is not just, as some had predicted, the media or pressure groups; members of the public are heavy users of the Act. A very wide range of information is now coming into the public domain which would not have been disclosed without freedom of information.[5]

8. The DCA stated that there had been some very significant releases across central government, and that 'Local authorities and local service providers are releasing information of real value to people's daily lives, public services and the environment.'[6]

9. Users of the Act who provided evidence were also positive. Maurice Frankel , Director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, told us that:

    I am very pleasantly surprised by the amount of information that has come out and the importance of a lot of it…I think that we have a worthwhile, important piece of legislation and it is functioning at the moment.[7]

10. The Act has clearly been of use to journalists. David Hencke, from the Guardian, stated 'I have been very surprised and pleased with parts of this Act.'[8] A written submission from the BBC stated that:

    Since January 2005 numerous journalists and programme-makers from across different parts of the BBC have sought to make use of the FOI Act and the Environmental Information Regulations to research material for broadcast. The information obtained has led to a wide range of investigative reports. FOI has proved a useful tool enabling our journalists to put into the public domain material which should indeed be there.[9]

11. Several witnesses provided examples of the constructive use being made of information received. The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) reported that voluntary and community organisations were using the Act to find out how public bodies arrived at decisions.[10] The BBC listed a number of investigative reports to which information obtained via FOI had made a significant contribution.[11] The reports covered an impressive range of subjects including performance of schools, internal police guidelines, food hygiene inspections and safety issues at a nuclear power station. The DCA's examples of significant new releases included details of individual Common Agricultural Policy subsidies paid to farmers and historical information from the 1980s and 1990s relating to nuclear waste storage, the UK withdrawal from the Exchange Rate Mechanism and the Falklands conflict.[12]

12. The National Archives stated that:

    50,000 records were proactively released by government departments and made publicly available at the National Archives on the first working day of FOI in January 2005. There records included…information ranging from research at Porton Down to arranged marriages…Home Office files on reviewing gambling laws and the classification of cannabis.[13]

The evidence from the National Archives highlighted the value of FOI to academic researchers:

    Scholars have new resources to understand and explain decisions taken within government. No longer is it necessary to wait for 30 years for major parts of this country's history to be written. Academic researchers are beginning to exploit the new opportunities for research that have been opened up by a combination of the FOI Act and the increasing availability of information online, although it may be a few years before the impact on research trends and patterns can be fully discerned.[14]

13. It is clear to us that the implementation of the FOI Act has already brought about significant and new releases of information and that this information is being used in a constructive and positive way by a range of different individuals and organisations. We have seen many examples of the benefits resulting from this legislation and are impressed with the efforts made by public authorities to meet the demands of the Act. This is a significant success.

14. Notwithstanding this success, we also found that the quality of compliance was variable. The BBC told us that 'Overall, the experience of BBC journalists and programme-makers who have tried to use FOI is that the response of public authorities is patchy and inconsistent, ranging from those who are highly efficient and cooperative to those who are neither.'[15] Other concerns raised by witnesses related to delays and inadequate complaints resolution. We go on to consider these problems in the following chapters.


2   www.dca.gov.uk/foi Back

3   www.dca.gov.uk/foi; Qq126 and 127 Back

4   www.ico.gov.uk  Back

5   Q2 Back

6   Ev 44, para 3.5 Back

7   Q104 Back

8   Q104 Back

9   Ev 81, para 2 Back

10   Ev 80, para 4.3 Back

11   Ev 82-83, para 10 Back

12   Ev 44, para 3.4 Back

13   Ev 58, para 1 Back

14   Ev 58, para 1 Back

15   Ev 83, para 19 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 28 June 2006