Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Greater London Authority and LDA

KEY ISSUES

Achievements so far

  1.  The Mayor has directed the LDA and Transport for London to begin the early work on the infrastructure that will make the Games possible.

  2.  Key appointments have already been made to the interim Olympic Delivery Authority.

  3.  J Murphy & Sons Ltd have been awarded the contract to carry out tunnelling work before power lines in the Lower Lea Valley can be buried underground—a contract worth £70 million.

Transport

  4.  Significant progress is already being made by TfL and other transport providers in delivering both the new projects and improvements to existing public transport that will be needed to meet the requirements of the 2012 Games.

  5.   East London Line—extended to Dalston and Crystal Palace, running eight trains per hour connecting South, East and North London from 2010.

  6.   DLR—extensions and a three car upgrade of the existing network will deliver a 50% increase in the DLR's capacity by 2011; the City Airport extension will open in December 2005.

  7.   London Underground—by 2012 over £4 billion will have been spent on the modernisation and renewal of the network.

  8.   Buses—in 2012 a 9,000 strong fully accessible fleet will provide real time passenger information on board buses as well as at stops.

Governance of the Olympic project

  9.  The Olympic Board is responsible for co-ordinating the overall Olympic project, including the work of the two main delivery bodies (LOCOG and the ODA). The Board must formally approve the delivery bodies' budgets and business plans every year. The Olympic Board consists of: the Mayor of London, the Secretary of State, the Chairman of the British Olympic Association and the Chair of LOCOG. The inclusion of the Mayor and Secretary of State ensure democratic accountability for the delivery of the Olympic project.

  10.  The lessons from previous Games show that there are massive benefits to be derived from the Games. LOCOG has worked with Government to establish the Nations and Regions group. As part of this group, there will be a specific grouping of bodies with an interest in London. This won't just be looking at the sporting legacy, but will address the benefits we foresee in terms of housing, employment and training, volunteering and culture. It will also be responsible for the engagement and consultation with London's communities that must underpin this process. In London, the LDA will be taking a leading role in realising and maximising the benefits.

Funding and Council Tax

  11.  The agreement on funding is a good and fair deal. The contributions to the public sector funding package (PSFP) from the National Lottery, London council tax and the London Development Agency reflect the extent to which the benefits of the Games will be felt nationally, but with a particular focus in London.

  12.  No Stakeholder has seen the need to renegotiate the agreement on how shortfall in the Olympic budgets would be met. Since London's election on 6 July, the other Olympic Stakeholders have focused on essential and time-critical elements of the Olympic project such as the approval for the LDA and TfL to begin work on key elements of the project including the Olympic Park development.

  13.  The agreed budgets for the London 2012 Games are robust: they have been approved by all the Stakeholders and the IOC and are fully met by the investment agreed through the Memorandum of Understanding between the Mayor and Government. The IOC Evaluation Commission described London's budgeting process as very detailed and meticulous" and stated that its "assumptions are well supported and documented".

  14.  It is not appropriate to cap the contribution of London council taxpayers, so that it does not exceed the maximum £625 million already agreed. Work to date, and ongoing, is focused on delivering the regeneration, infrastructure and facilities required for the Games on time and in line with the prudent budgets already agreed. In the event of over-run, the Stakeholders will consider all the options available to them; it would not be prudent arbitrarily to close off any options at this stage.

  15.  It is expected that the GLA will grant money raised through council tax to the ODA for investment in the Olympic project, subject to the funding agreement that normally applies in such cases. As with any grant, the GLA chief finance officer will account for the grant funding; this will involve ensuring that the grant is being spent on the functions for which it was granted and in turn reporting to the Mayor and Assembly.

The Interim Olympic Delivery Authority: Role of TfL and the LDA

  16.  The Mayor directed TfL and the LDA to act as the interim Olympic Delivery Authority simply because he was keen that there be no ambiguity about the role of TfL and the LDA, and that publicly available documents would set out exactly what was planned and expected. Through the Mayor's direction, the work of the interim ODA is directly traceable to the Olympic Board, just as the work of the permanent ODA will be.

  17.  The LDA is committed to assisting businesses and assessing their needs. The LDA has been working closely with the various groups, including the businesses that would need to be relocated to make way for the Olympic Park, on a case by case basis for nearly two years. They have also given firm assurances about the support that businesses will receive. Businesses will be compensated and supported as generously as possible, within the legal framework in which the LDA operates. In fact the LDA has gone well beyond its obligations by offering appropriate relocation options and agreeing to pay for their legal and surveying advice ahead of the bid decision. Work to identify appropriate relocation options are well underway and detailed negotiations are progressing with many of the businesses.

  18.  It is clear that preparing for the Games presents a massive opportunity for companies of every size in London and across the whole of the UK to compete for new contracts. For the next few years, initial opportunities will be focused on infrastructure. However, the Games will also provide potential for businesses in a range of different industries including construction, professional services, tourism/hospitality, leisure, transport, retail, food and the creative and cultural sectors.

  19.  In order to increase the chances of winning contracts, small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) need to be in a position where they can compete effectively—or be "fit to supply". London already has a number of excellent programmes in place to help SMEs develop this knowledge. A good example is the LDA's pan-London initiative, "Supply London", which works with SMEs and helps provide the support necessary to become fit to supply. Other recommended services in London are provided by Manufacturing Advisory Service, Jobnet (run by London Riverside) and Fit to Supply. Outside of London, SMEs need to be talking to their local Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) who already assist in co-ordinating extensive support for business.

  20.  In addition to existing services, there will be a need to develop more tailored support initiatives, such as Olympic business clubs and market intelligence networks that are specially geared for the needs of the Games. The stakeholders (Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the Mayor and the British Olympic Association) for the Games are now looking closely at building on previous successful models, like those used in Sydney for example, and discussions are taking place now about the best way to set these up. Any business initiatives for the Games will be up and running and integrated within regional support provision well ahead of major construction milestones.

Community and borough engagement

  21.  Engagement with London's communities will be underpinned by the Local Community Involvement Framework which must be agreed as a pre-commencement condition for the Olympic Park planning consent. This framework will build on already established links with key agencies representing the health, education, children and young people, disability, voluntary and community sectors and ethnic and faith communities.

  22.  LOCOG is appointing a Community Liaison officer to co-ordinate this work, working closely with the GLA Stakeholders team and the other Olympic Stakeholders including—when it is established—the ODA. It is our expectation that the London 2012 Forum, established during London's bid, will also continue and develop throughout the delivery phase.

  23.  We have already begun working with the ALG to ensure open communication with London boroughs, and to set up a system that will allow elected members and officers from all London boroughs to stay involved and make a valuable contribution throughout the life of the project. The five Olympic boroughs in East London have already established a co-ordinator to work across the five boroughs, reflecting their specific interests in the project.

  24.  London's security arrangements for the Games are already robust. Policing and security services in London and the UK are among the most experienced in the world in dealing with the terrorist threat; this is reflected in the fact that officers from the Metropolitan Police had a leading role in the international team responsible for security at the Athens Olympics. The International Olympic Committee recognises the UK's expertise in this field, and has expressed its complete confidence in our ability to make the Games safe and secure.

  25.  The Olympic Security Committee, chaired by the Home Secretary, is the best way to co-ordinate all the police, intelligence and response services that will work together to make the London Games safe and secure. The Home Office and the Met Police were both closely involved in the development of our security plans, as set out in Theme 12 of the Candidate File, and are committed to close collaboration from the earliest.stages of the Olympic project, where security considerations will be incorporated into design work for the Olympic facilities.

Legacy and wider benefits

  26.  The Olympic Stakeholders are leading work to identify the best long-term owners and/or managers for legacy venues, and for the maintenance of the Olympic Park after the Games. This work is ongoing, and no firm decisions have yet been made.

  27.  We remain committed to the "no white elephants" policy for the Games. No permanent venue will begin construction until we have agreed a sustainable long-term business plan for that venue.

  28.  The Stakeholders—GLA, Government and British Olympic Association—all have an interest in a sustainable legacy for British sport and in a broader positive impact of the Games in London and the UK. But the legacy picture involves more than just the stakeholders: we will continue the partnership approach to legacy that characterised discussions during the period of the bid. As well as sporting bodies, this will include those organisations and groups involved in housing, employment and skills, open space and much more.

  29.  The London Olympics Bill clearly obliges the Olympic Delivery Authority to put legacy considerations at the heart of its work. The GLA has the same responsibility when exercising its new "Olympic power".

October 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 2 December 2005