Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 257-259)

FIVE

6 DECEMBER 2005

  Q257 Chairman: Can I welcome Jane Lighting, Chief Executive of Channel Five, Grant Murray and Sue Robertson also of Five, and to apologise to you for having kept you waiting for some time. Perhaps you would like to begin, as the previous speakers have done, by giving us an overview of Five's perspective of analogue switch-off.

  Ms Lighting: Absolutely. I would be delighted to. One of the benefits perhaps of going last is that of course I have been able to hear a number of the opinions of my colleagues and it is interesting, of course, just how many issues we do share in common. But some are different and perhaps it would be useful for me to start with some of the slight differences in Five's position to some of the opinions that you heard earlier. I think the first one to start with, and possibly the most obvious, but just to remind you, is clearly that the rollout of digital for Five certainly has a benefit which helps mitigate, if you like, against some of the challenges that also come from the rollout of digital and the fragmentation of our market. Clearly what we are looking forward to is the first time that Five will actually be received in all homes on a par with our competitors. Clearly, up until this point that has not been the case with Five, despite the fact that we have welcomed digital rollout to this point and the fact that that has helped our coverage enormously. I think it is also worth noting that Five has actually been seen as a real benefit for those people who have gone out and bought Freeview, that for many it has been the first time they have been able to receive Five and to benefit from Five's programmes. I think the other point that is certainly worth pointing out as a difference is that Five is very different because we are much younger than our competitors, so a number of our competitors have already started to respond to the challenge of fragmentation by launching their multi-channel strategies, by starting to launch the diginets that they have. Five is only eight years old. We have grown very fast in that time and very well, but we have only just in the last two years become profitable as a company and therefore have had to focus very much on our core business and getting that right before we were able to start looking at our digital strategy. What I can say, and what I am delighted to say, is that a few weeks ago we announced that we have taken a strategic investment in Top-Up TV, and whilst unfortunately it is commercially sensitive so I am not going to be able to answer questions on that directly today, what I can say to you is that this is a part of and an important step in us moving into a multi-channel mode and for us actually to look forward to launching our own diginets in the near future. In terms of other points that I would briefly, if I may, comment upon, I think there is a significant challenge. Whilst, as I say, we look forward to digital rollout we also absolutely acknowledge the challenge that this is to our business. We would, however, probably take a slightly different view in terms of some of the things I have heard said today around PSB because our view is that we are extremely committed to PSB and that we see it as a really important differentiator for Five in a totally multi-channel environment. In a world of 400 channels how do you stand out from the crowd? Actually having a PSB brand attached to you, we think, brings a number of positive elements, not just in the case of diversity and the range of programmes but also in terms of certain quality thresholds, and I think that if looked at positively that has a real positive aspect to your brand as well. I think quite clearly one of the issues is how do we continue to invest in our PSB programming. I would take a slight issue with one comment that was made earlier, when I think ITV and Channel 5 were put in the same basket as reducing their commitment to PSB recently. Nothing could be further from the truth. Five over the last two, three years, has increased the amount of original programming that we make, quite considerably, and also has really increased the range and diversity of programmes that we have across the arts, philosophy, poetry, across history and science, and for next year one of our big pushes is actually into original drama and comedy programming. I think one of the other points I would like to make is that in terms of part of the solutions to these challenges, one thing that Five has been very upfront in terms of what it does not support is that we are not looking for some kind of top slicing formula here; that is not what we feel would be the right solution. Actually we feel, as Clive said earlier, one of the first places we absolutely need to look at is the self-help and how we are going to rise to the challenge to move our businesses into a new era and into a new digital environment. There are things that I think we should focus on in helping us to do that. One, which was also mentioned, is around advertising regulations, ways in which we can perhaps have some more flexibility to be able to be commercial in certain ways in the schedule. The other one, which is really very important, which Andy also touched on and which we see as being absolutely crucial to our ability to continue to fund PSB, is actually over the rights issue because we are clearly funding 100% of the cost of PSB programming. At the moment we have the right to broadcast that on Five; what we need to be able to do is develop other ways of benefiting from revenue streams that will come from broadband, from downloading, from all these other new media. If in fact there is a disintegration of these rights and those rights are being exploited even before we have had a chance to show a repeat of our original PSB programme we will really be undermined in terms of our ability to earn our revenue on those programmes. So I think that is one of the really key issues that are currently being debated. There is a consultation going on with Ofcom, and the outcome of that we think is really going to feed into the ability of PSBs to be self-supportive in the future.

  Chairman: Thank you. Rosemary McKenna.

  Q258  Rosemary McKenna: Good afternoon. You have already said that you appreciate your larger audience share because of digital, DTT, so how important then is Freeview to Five's funding streams, from advertising in particular?

  Ms Lighting: It has been really important to us. It is true to say that obviously the benefit that we have from all digital, even where Five is carried in pay-digital environments, whether that is Sky or analogue, have clearly added to our coverage. So for many people it has been the only way to receive Five. Clearly Freeview, certainly in my view, has the benefit not only of providing access to Five but access to Five on the basis that is intended, which is free, with no strings attached and the ability to enjoy public service television as people have the other four analogue broadcasters.

  Q259  Rosemary McKenna: So are you concerned about the modern methods of recording, et cetera, that are going to make a difference to how people view television? They are going to create their own programmes, are they not? They are going to create their own timescale and timeframe in which they want to watch programmes, and the ability to skip the adverts?

  Ms Lighting: Absolutely. That issue, plus others which are clearly going to be raised as challenges for us in terms of what broadband will allow and the ability to have video on demand, even free downloads and so on, you sort of feel that we are sitting in perhaps a similar place to the music companies a few years ago, and I think one of the really important things that we need to absolutely engage with is the fact that we cannot sit here and hold back the tide. Technology is happening; this is a choice of consumers; this is what consumers want, and I think what we need to do is look at how we can adapt our business models to be part of that process, and one of the key parts of that for us, through the investment in content, is then to be able to look at all of these different methods of distribution, all of these different methods of usage and see how we can actually try to build business models that will allow us to earn revenues wherever it is used.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 29 March 2006