Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Further supplementary memorandum from Digital UK

  The Committee has raised some questions about the facts of the Ferryside trial conducted in early 2005. Emyr Byron Hughes, the Ferryside Project Manager, addressed these issues in our lunch presentation of 15 November. Digital UK has drafted this note with Emyr's support to clarify some of the issues raised, particularly the need for new aerials and the cost of the trial.

ABOUT FERRYSIDE

    —  475 homes—c 1,200 people in Ferryside and Llansteffan.

    —  Profile slightly older than UK average, with higher proportion of ill and disabled.

EQUIPMENT

    —  Equipment was subsidised:

    —  Choice of five set-top boxes.

    —  two digital recorders.

    —  Could upgrade to iDTV or other platforms to equivalent cost.

    —  But all aerial work was paid for by householders.

CONVERSION

    —  80% installed with no assistance.

    —  20% needed some help or advice—but the helpline satisfied most.

    —  c 5% needed significant help and home visits.

AERIALS

    —  The "45%" of households needing new aerials is an incorrect reading of the Ferryside report.

    —  23% of homes either moved their aerial round, or in some cases installed a new aerial, in order to receive from the Ferryside transmitter and so become part of the trial area. These homes should be discounted as they only did work in order to take advantage of the trial.

    —  22% of homes carried out some remedial work on their aerial installation or connecting cables.

    —  Of the 22% who carried out some work on their aerial, some needed to change or alter their rooftop installation; others simply needed to replace the new cables between the wall and the TV.

    —  The split was not measured, but it is thought that most had cable problems rather than aerial problems, so approximately 10% of households needed new aerials—a figure which is consistent with Ofcom's estimate in its "Cost and Energy Report" (8 November 2005) that 10% of households might need new aerials at switchover.

    —  All aerial work was done before the analogue signal was switched off, and no one lost reception at switchover.

SATISFACTION

    —  87% responded to the questionnaire at the end of the trial—99.2% voted in favour of keeping digital.

COSTS

    —  The project cost a total of £865,000 and was funded by DCMS, DTI and, to a lesser extent, by the broadcasters.

    —  The figure of "£2,000" per household has been arrived at simply by dividing the project cost by the number of households (475) in the trial.

    —  It has been suggested in earlier evidence given to the Committee that £2,000 was the cost of providing technical assistance. This is not the case, since the project included other costs. As detailed below, the cost of consumer equipment was £340 per household, and the average cost of installation support and the call centre £180 per household. The main element of the trial costs was the conversion of the Ferryside transmitter.

    —  In any case, the project cost does not provide a guide to the cost of actual switchover since:

    (i)  As a trial, there was a substantial investment in research;

    (ii)  The trial was not able to take advantage of the economies of scale that will come into play in switchover proper; and

    (iii)  The cost of consumer equipment has already fallen since the Ferryside trial, and is expected to fall further.

    —  Many elements of the project were provided under commercial contract, so precise costs were not provided in the Ferryside report.

    —  We do know, however, that there were five categories of cost, as follows:

  1.  Planning and Project Management

    —  Planning and management was provided by DCMS and DTI and amounted to approximately 10% of project costs.

  2.  Installation Support and Call Centre

    —  Support costs were also approximately 10% of project costs, or around £180 per household.

  3.  Transmitter Conversion

    —  More than half of the project cost was for the conversion of the Ferryside transmitter. This is a fixed cost and would have been similar had the transmitter served several thousand homes.

  4.  Domestic Equipment

    —  Trial homes had, on average, 2.75 TVs and 1.5 VCRs (higher than the UK average). All equipment was converted, at a cost of £80 per unit; or £340 per home. For all 475 homes this amounted to £160,000, or approximately 18% of the total project cost.

    —  Since the trial, prices have come down, and are expected to fall further.

    —  In the Bolton trial, for example, the average unit cost is closer to £50.

    —  At switchover, Ofcom expects DTT set-top boxes to cost £26 and digital recorders £80 (Ofcom Cost and Energy Report, 8 November 2005); and the cost of converting a household to range from £26 to £153.

  5.  Research

    —  Since Ferryside was a trial, provision was made for a substantial research budget, which comprised approximately 10% of the project budget.

  If you have any further questions on this or other topics, please feel free to contact me.

6 December 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 29 March 2006