Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Annex 4

ARTICLE BY RT HON TESSA JOWELL MP, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT THE DAILY TELEGRAPH, 14 SEPTEMBER 2005

ECB WERE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE POSITION OVER TV RIGHTS

  It has almost been possible to touch the fervour and the sense of excitement over England's Ashes win. It was, as the Telegraph said, a glorious end to a summer that began with our success in bringing the Olympic Games to London.

  I saw that champagne mood building up at the Oval on Sunday and uncorked in Trafalgar Square yesterday. But I know that—as well as the joy—there is concern among some Daily Telegraph readers that there will not be live Test cricket on terrestrial television for the next four years.

  It is important to be clear how this happened and what will happen next. In 1998 Test cricket was removed from the list of sporting events that have to be made available to all viewers—at the specific request of the England and Wales Cricket Board.

  They sought this freedom so they could maximise their income from selling broadcasting rights to the highest bidder: crucial, since 80% of the ECB's income comes from that source.

  It is a matter of public record that the BBC did not bid for the new television contract. Not for live cricket, nor recorded highlights, not for five-day games, not for county cricket, nor Twenty20.

  ITV did not bid either and the offer involving Channel 4 was too low. Had it been accepted—instead of Sky's offer for all the action—the sport would have lost almost £100 million over four years—money vital to the future not just of the national team, but also to cricket at grassroots level and among our young people. The cricket authorities have been in an impossible position: between a rock and a hard place. As W F Deedes recognised in this newspaper last week, cricket needs this money to build a brighter future. If cricket did not have this income because ministers tied its hands we would rightly be criticised.

  It would be wholly wrong for the Government to intervene to prevent Sky's contract with the ECB going ahead—and on what grounds? This is a contract that was won fair and square, by open competition. I am confident Sky's coverage next season will be first class and their enterprise and imagination will help spread cricket's message.

  When it comes to the future, I announced yesterday that it was my intention that there should be a review of the list of events that should be accessible to all viewers. This will happen around 2008 or 2009, as Britain begins the switch-over to digital television—a move which will transform TV in this country. This is the right time to weigh up these complex issues as the new shape of British TV starts to emerge.

  Government has a role: to protect the public interest and the availability of treasured national sporting events in the new digital world. However, the challenge for all of us is to think not just what cricket has done for us in the last two months, but to think what we can do for cricket.

  That means people getting back to old habits and actually going and watching cricket—supporting England in big numbers again next summer and developing something of the same affinity for county teams that football engenders.

  That is a big challenge to cricket to build on what has been achieved at Test level and with Twenty20. To make the likes of Vaughan and Flintoff, Pietersen and Jones role models for new generations, not just one-summer wonders.

  To take the game to our town and cities, using the big screen idea developed so successfully with "Cricket in the Park".

  So in four years' time, when Australia return, I hope the cricket authorities will be wondering if grounds like the Oval are big enough to satisfy all the public demand.

  So that parents will encourage their sons and daughters to watch the highlights on Five from next year, but also—and much more importantly—to watch their heroes in the flesh and play themselves. That means schools having a big role and I am delighted at the work the Chance to Shine campaign to get cricket back into state schools.

  This summer could be the moment when cricket is re-born as our national summer sport—not just on television, but in playgrounds, sports fields and indoor centres the length of our country.

16 November 2005



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 1 February 2006