Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Heritage Link

  During our oral evidence session on 18 April the Committee raised the question of whether the interests of the historic environment would be better served if it were moved to another Department, in particular ODPM.

  As we explained to the Committee, we felt that a complete move risked creating another, different but potentially difficult boundary and suggested that what would be most desirable was more vigorous championing by DCMS together with a better understanding in both Departments of the very significant effect of planning and other issues in the ODPM stable on the management of the historic environment. Elaborating on what we said on 18 April, one means of achieving this might be to create, at a senior level within ODPM, a unit with responsibility for heritage issues. Such a unit would provide a dedicated resource within ODPM which would act as a counterpart to DCMS' broader interests and would reinforce the embedding of historic environment issues were in ODPM agendas. (It would of course be possible to argue for similar units in other departments eg Defra but if the key interest outside DCMS in ODPM were covered by a dedicated unit, the needs elsewhere could be met by full implementation of the "Heritage Minister" proposals in A Force for Our Future.)

  I hope that the Committee will feel able to take these further thoughts into account in its consideration of its Report.

10 May 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 20 July 2006