Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Yorkshire Historic Environment Forum (YHEF)

  The YHEF was formed in 2002 to provide a single voice in the region for all those concerned with the current and future management of the historic environment. Its area of interest is the same as the Government Office area of Yorkshire and the Humber, and includes North Yorkshire and York, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, East Yorkshire and Hull, and northern Lincolnshire (encompassing the two unitary authorities of North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire). It is one of nine regional Historic Environment Fora. Its key objectives are:

    —  To promote understanding and appreciation of the historic environment, and its positive role in the regeneration and renaissance of Yorkshire region.

    —  To help market the historic environment to visitors to the region.

    —  To develop integrated policies relating to the historic environment of the region.

    —  To act as a single focus for consultation on the future of the historic environment in Yorkshire.

    —  To share information on the plans of individual organisations and to work in partnership together and with others.

    —  To share best practice in the management of the historic environment, including the need to develop skills and continuity in conservation and craftsmanship, and the need to build capacity and engage communities in such management.

    —  To help English Heritage in its role as lead body advising government and local government on the historic environment in Yorkshire.

  Collectively, its priorities are to:

    —  widen public enjoyment and understanding of the historic environment;;

    —  conserve the components of the historic environment and encourage the creative use of historic places in the Yorkshire of tomorrow;

    —  unlock the potential of local places;

    —  ensure that the formal planning systems in the region properly identify, recognise, value and protect the region's historic environment;

    —  modernise sector skills and working culture; and

    —  explain the importance of, and represent the needs of, the historic environment to decision-makers and action-takers.

For this Select Committee inquiry, the key messages from the YHEF are:

    —  Regional fora have a strong role to play in supporting the work of English Heritage as lead body in the sector.

    —  Regional fora are able to make significant impacts on regional policy and funding for the sector.

    —  There is growing recognition of the value of the historic environment as a catalyst for regeneration through the sustainable re-use of existing assets, the contribution it makes to quality of place and the direct benefits it brings in terms of tourism (worth £4 billion GDP in Yorkshire).

    —  Lack of resources is having an impact on the historic environment, in particular on the shortage of funding to assist private owners of historic places, the deteriorating condition of so many of our historic places of worship and the shortage of expert conservation staff in local authorities.

  Member organisations represented on the YHEF, listed on the Appendix below, may offer separate observations to the Select Committee without prejudice to the collective comments here.

1.  What the Department for Culture, Media and Sport should identify as priorities in the forthcoming Heritage White Paper.

  YHEF are aware that English Heritage's response on this heading will be comprehensive, and have no specific or additional observations.

2.  The remit and effectiveness of DCMS, English Heritage and other relevant organisations in representing heritage interests inside and outside Government

  The development of nine regional Historic Environment Fora has been one way in which English Heritage has improved the representation of sectoral interests at regional level. The YHEF membership includes a wide range of heritage interests both inside and outside Government and adds an important extra dimension to the work and activities of individual bodies.

  Each year since 2002 the Yorkshire Historic Environment Forum has published "Heritage Counts: The State of Yorkshire's Historic Environment" report. The document lists Yorkshire's historic environment assets, monitors the pressures they are under, the resources required to manage them, and the many opportunities they present to support the economic and social wellbeing of the region. In 2005, the fourth State of the Historic Environment report for Yorkshire was published; a copy is enclosed for reference. Trends discernible over this relatively short timescale indicate that:

    —  Development pressure in Yorkshire is particularly strong. In many cases poor decisions and unregulated development are degrading the quality of the historic environment—designated and undesignated—and eroding its significance to communities and visitors.

    —  Up to a third of planning applications have a conservation element, yet local authorities employ on average fewer than two specialist conservation officers.

    —  Despite good progress with buildings on English Heritage's Buildings at Risk Register for Yorkshire, grade I and II* buildings continue to be added to the Register, reflecting the lack of assistance available to owners of historic places. Only four out of every 10 places of worship applications can be helped.

  The sector collectively has been swift to act in response to the findings of the 2002 report. In Yorkshire, we can demonstrate that:

    —  We have a clear understanding of the funding priorities for the sector and can demonstrate that investment in historic infrastructure is cost effective, sustainable and in line with the needs of local communities.

    —  We know which communities and sectors of societies are excluded from participation in the historic environment and are actively addressing this issue through physical works and a broad spectrum of outreach initiatives.

    —  We have a better understanding of the threats facing the region's historic designed landscapes. Through pilot work with English Heritage and the Yorkshire Gardens Trust, we know that almost two thirds of Yorkshire's designed landscapes are at risk, whilst a national survey has indicated that Yorkshire has suffered some of the highest rates of loss of pre-1919 parkland in England.

    —  We understand the needs of the region's voluntary sector better, and have acted to strengthen their engagement with the regional agenda.

    —  We are tackling the disproportionately high number of Buildings at Risk with more success than any other English region.

  The data from Heritage Counts is now helping decision-makers at a regional level bring the historic environment into their thinking. For example, its indicator set is helping the Regional Assembly monitor change in the built as well as the natural environment through its annual review Progress in the Region, where heritage now shares a chapter and some high level indicators with the natural environment sector. Progress in the Region is widely used to support policy formation and delivery both within regional and local government and in the commercial sector. Heritage Counts data is also enabling English Heritage to support Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber in advising on the cultural components of Local Area Agreements.

3.  The balance between heritage and development needs in planning policy

  Yorkshire is a living, exciting, beautiful place which is constantly changing. If Yorkshire's historic environment is to play its proper part in the future of Yorkshire, then it is essential that change is embraced in a way that enhances that which is most valued by the people of Yorkshire.

  The Yorkshire Historic Environment Forum has, with Yorkshire Culture (the regional Cultural Consortium) and the Yorkshire and Humber Assembly, commissioned a first-of-its-kind study to identify the way in which the historic environment should be enhanced, protected and harnessed to promote economic and social wellbeing through the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS). The work identified what was regionally significant in Yorkshire's historic environment, and examined appropriate policy responses.

  As a direct result, the draft RSS contains high-level policies which recognise the importance of the historic environment to Yorkshire's identity and future development, a major step forward in regional spatial planning, and a direct result of partnership working through the Forum.

4.  Access to heritage and the position of heritage as a cultural asset in the community

  The member bodies of the YHEF own manage or maintain many of the cultural assets in the region which attract visitors, offer a valuable educational resource and provide a strong sense of place to those living and working in Yorkshire. Visits to museums, art galleries, historic properties, gardens, heritage railways, places of worship and heritage centres accounted for over half of all visits to the region in 2004 (VisitBritain "Visitor Attraction Trends in England 2004", August 2005). To this should be added the landscapes of the Yorkshire Dales National Park, the North York Moors National Park, part of the Peak National Park, and the Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (Howardian Hills and Nidderdale). The Countryside Right of Way Act resulted in over 60% of the Yorkshire Dales National Park being openly accessible.

  Many organisations within the sector in the region are actively involved with schools, lifelong learning and outreach work. The 67 Civic Societies in the region promote access to the cultural environment through their core educational activities and through their participation in Heritage Open Days, which last year saw Leeds coming second only to London in the number of properties open to the public. English Heritage properties have witnessed a 7% increase in school and education visits each year since 2003, and its Outreach programme in the region has involved people and communities not traditionally engaged with the historic environment in exciting and inspiring ways—a project in Bradford, for example, used the rich legacy of prehistoric rock art on Ilkley Moor as a point of departure for an arts-based project for disaffected young people in the city. Furthermore, church social action in the region benefits 150,000 people, involves over 50,000 volunteers and 3,000 staff, and worth in the region of £55-£75 million per annum to the region (Churches Regional Commission, Angels and Advocates, 2002). The Yorkshire Gardens Trust is also working with Refugee Action in Leeds to arrange visits for families to historic gardens.

  Participation, for the historic environment sector, also means helping engage communities in decisions about their local environment and what it means to them in cultural terms. Heritage Counts 2003 reported that over half of people questioned in Bradford agreed that "caring for neglected and derelict buildings" was the biggest issue facing their local area, followed by "too many boarded-up, unused buildings" (52%) and "the condition of gardens and parks" (40%). English Heritage has, with the support of YHEF members, funded a ground-breaking conference to explore heritage-led community planning, informed by the Castleford Heritage Group, who have placed what they hold to be of local cultural significance at the heart of the town's regeneration plans. The conference findings will be translated into a "toolkit", to help other communities, like those in Bradford, to place the environmental and cultural significance of their locale firmly at the heart of future proposals for change, growth or regeneration.

5.  Funding, with particular reference to the adequacy of the budget for English Heritage and for museums and galleries, the impact of the London 2012 Olympics on Lottery funding for heritage projects, and forthcoming decisions on the sharing of funds from Lottery sources between good causes

Agencies will make individual responses on their own funding position

  The YHEF Investment Strategy

  The YHEF published "Investing in Yorkshire's Heritage: an Investment Strategy for the historic environment sector in Yorkshire and the Humber" in June 2005. The Strategy recognises that in fact, there are many funding opportunities for the sector; the issue is influencing where available funds are spent and identifying where the pressure points are.

  The Investment Strategy, in matching high-level DCMS objectives and regional needs and opportunities in the sector, has been an effective tool in accessing funding opportunities. Yorkshire Forward is considering targetted investment into some of the regionally-significant rural heritage assets in the Strategy over the next three years, having been assured by the collective approach the Sector has taken in drawing up its priorities and action plan. Partnerships and mechanisms to meet projects outside Yorkshire Forward's remit are being developed.

Key funding challenges: privately-owned historic assets

  The Strategy will also assist the sector in addressing funding pinch points. For example, English Heritage is one of very few agencies able to provide meaningful funding for non-economic repairs in the historic environment; it is also one of few bodies able to offer assistance to the repair and maintenance of privately-owned historic assets, where demand is very high. For example, 78 of the region's grade I or II* Buildings at Risk are privately owned (almost 70% of the regional Register total). Figures are approximate, but the repair bill for these buildings alone may be in the region of £7.5 million. The English Heritage grant requirement is just over £1 million, twice the annual regional grant available.

Key funding challenges: places of worship

  Demand is also far outstripping resources for the English Heritage and Heritage Lottery Fund joint Repair Grants for Places of Worship Scheme, the primary source of funding for urgent repairs to places of worship, of which there are over 1,000 in the region. This scheme has disbursed approximately £24 million over the 1994-2004 period, however, in 2003 the Church of England in Yorkshire predicted that £40 million was needed until 2008 for repairs alone—costs for modest schemes to extend the use of churches for community purposes would add considerably to this figure.

Key funding challenges: the rural historic environment

  The sector also recognises the significant opportunity that the new Environmental Stewardship Scheme (ES) presents for the rural historic environment. In highly agricultural parts of the region, up to 60% of nationally important archaeological sites are at risk, mainly from farming operations, but also from neglect. Furthermore, iconic landscapes and features (for example the large-scale ritual landscape associated with the Great Wolds Valley in East Yorkshire, and the Yorkshire Dales dry stone barns and walls), need significant, long-term investment and stewardship to secure their protection and ongoing contribution to local identity and attractiveness for visitors and investors alike.

  There are two challenges in harnessing the potential of the ES scheme to the needs of the historic environment: the first will be to encourage landowners and managers to choose options within their agreement which tackle the needs of historic environment assets on their land. To help in this, a partnership of regional agencies has helped develop the Targeting Statements for the ES scheme; these highlight which historic environment assets in various geographic areas should be priorities for funding, and what the funding response might be. If the predicted 70% take-up materialises after 10 years, Yorkshire should experience a nine fold increase in ES schemes operating in the region, potentially benefiting a far greater number of designated and non-designated cultural heritage assets in the rural environment than ever.

  The second challenge is to ensure there is sufficient advice and expertise available to ensure that the historic environment receives equal billing to other environmental concerns when drawing up and funding schemes: Yorkshire's Heritage Counts 2005 highlighted an under-provision in the advice on cultural heritage available to landowners and managers compared to the provision of advice from the natural environment sector. English Heritage and North Yorkshire County Council have made funding available to support additional advisory posts, but this can only go so far to redress this imbalance.

The London 2012 Olympics

  The heritage sector is keen to support the cultural aims and objectives associated with the London 2012 Olympics. The London 2012 games present an opportunity to showcase what is culturally significant about Britain. The sector in Yorkshire will engage through Yorkshire Culture, a member of the YHEF.

6.  What the roles and responsibilities should be for English Heritage, the HLF, local authorities, museums and galleries, charitable and other non-Governmental organisations in maintaining the nation's heritage

  Whilst it is for the individual organisations to comment on their own roles and responsibilities in response to this question, there is a clear benefit to bringing together partners in the sector to assist in maintaining the heritage, as outlined in the examples given throughout this response.

7.  Whether there is an adequate supply of professionals with conservation skills; the priority placed by planning authorities on conservation; and means of making conservation expertise more accessible to planning officers, councillors and the general public

Local authorities

  Local authorities are essential to the protection and management of the historic environment. A national survey in 2002 revealed that on average, local authorities employed 2.1 full-time equivalent (FTE) specialist building conservation staff. The Yorkshire complement is currently just above this level, however, there are marked variations which suggest that some local authorities have difficulty in prioritising funding for full-time equivalent specialist posts: only one North Yorkshire authority maintains over 2.0 FTE posts for example. Respondents to Heritage Counts data collection have mentioned that expertise is often brought in to complete initiatives like Buildings at Risk registers; this temporarily boosts staff figures and achieves a specific aim, but provides no long-term support or continuity for the management of the historic environment. In the same way, the region's nine Historic Environment Records facilities have more staff than two years ago, but many are on short-term contracts. YHEF members are also concerned about adequate provision of staff to designate historic assets in the future, and for staff to provide advice on specialist conservation within the Environmental Stewardship scheme, for example, historic designed landscapes.

  Furthermore, the data shows that some Yorkshire local authorities struggle to fund heritage-supporting activities other than FTE complement. Over half the region's grade II buildings are yet to be assessed in the context of an "at risk" strategy, 60% of the region's conservation areas do not have a character appraisal, seven authorities had no historic environment grants budget for the second year running in 2005, and only half have an Historic Environment Champion to date.

The Academy for Sustainable Communities

  The YHEF recognise the opportunity presented by the establishment of the Academy for Sustainable Communities in Leeds, particularly with regard to training in historic environment management, conservation-led regeneration, community planning, public realm design, traditional construction skills and training for engineers, elected members and other key professions. Connections with the sector are planned, to support English Heritage's engagement with the Academy at a national level.

Other sector skills shortages

  The recent study by the National Heritage Training Group and CITB ConstructionSkills revealed a shortage of traditional construction crafts practitioners across England. Yorkshire requires a 6% increase in the number of such individuals, higher than the 4% rise required nationally. The YHEF will be assisting English Heritage in taking forward a Skills Action Plan to address this in 2006.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 19 April 2006