Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Borough of Telford & Wrekin

SUMMARY

  This paper is a submission by the Borough of Telford & Wrekin to the above Inquiry by the Culture, Media and Sport Committee. The views submitted relate only to World Heritage matters.

  In summary, the Council's view is that nationally and locally much more can and should be done to fulfil the obligations placed upon the Government by its ratification of the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention. By definition, World Heritage Sites are the most important natural and cultural sites within the world and their protection, management and promotion should reflect this.

  The paper suggests that steps should be taken to give WHSs in the UK statutory protection and also to address with urgency major risks which threaten the long term future of Sites, for example land instability. It is also suggested that the respective roles of Government, Site owners, local authorities and other stakeholders are more clearly identified and recognised and that the necessary resources are made available to enable those roles to be undertaken effectively.

  Finally, much more can be done to increase public awareness and appreciation of World Heritage Sites and, this in turn, will help to enhance the contribution of local communities to the protection of the Sites.

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Borough of Telford & Wrekin welcomes the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee inquiry into Protecting, Preserving and Making Accessible Our Nation's Heritage. The Borough incorporates one of Britain's major heritage sites, the World Heritage Site of the Ironbridge Gorge, the cradle of the Industrial Revolution. Our submission reflects our concerns about the management of World Heritage Sites and the need for greater support and funding from the Government in recognition of the national contribution that these Sites make. The submission also highlights the importance of increasing the statutory recognition of World Heritage within legislation. World Heritage Sites are an important contributor to the national economy, to education and to creativity across Britain and should be recognised as such through greater national support.

BACKGROUND

  2.  The Borough of Telford and Wrekin is a unitary local authority, located in the West Midlands, which covers the New Town of Telford, including the Ironbridge Gorge and a number of other settlements. The Ironbridge Gorge was designated a World Heritage Site (WHS) in 1986 and encloses 550 hectares. The Site was recognised for its significance in the development of the Industrial Revolution, particularly in the iron and coal industries. The WHS boundary is shared with the Severn Gorge Conservation Area, which was designated in 1980. As with World Heritage Sites in Edinburgh and Bath, Ironbridge Gorge is a living, working community, home to some 4,000 residents (in the villages of Coalbrookdale, Ironbridge, Coalport and Jackfield), small businesses and a vibrant hotel and restaurant sector. The Site, which incorporates a large number of museums, is a major economic driver for the area and is one of the West Midland's leading visitor attractions.

  3.  The landscape of the Ironbridge Gorge is rich in evidence of the Industrial Revolution. These sites are carefully preserved, along with supplementary documentary and oral sources, which are held within the Ironbridge Gorge Museums. A number of collections are also held within the WHS. The Site's townscape has also been sympathetically restored, along with the preservation of the Gorge's natural heritage. The Site sustains hundreds of jobs in the area and attracts some 750,000 visitors per annum. The Site is also an important teaching tool for a range of subjects including history, geography, science, design and citizenship and it has become an important National Education Centre.

  4.  Management of the WHS is divided between a range of organisations, though the Borough of Telford and Wrekin has taken the lead in terms of the sustainable development and management of the WHS. The key stakeholder agencies and organisations involved in the management of the Site include:

    —  DCMS;

    —  English Heritage;

    —  ICOMOS UK;

    —  English Nature;

    —  The Environment Agency;

    —  Borough of Telford & Wrekin;

    —  Shropshire County Council;

    —  Bridgnorth District Council;

    —  Five Parish Councils;

    —  The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust;

    —  The Ironbridge Institute;

    —  Severn Gorge Countryside Trust;

    —  Ironbridge Chamber of Trade.

  5.  The WHS has a Management Plan and also has a designated officer to oversee the implementation of the Plan. The multiple nature of the agencies involved brings strengths and weaknesses to the management of the Site and we wish to address some of these issues in this submission.

The Role of Government Agencies

  6.  There are a number of Government departments and agencies with an interest in heritage and World Heritage Site issues—particularly those Sites in an urban or post-industrial setting. However, the input from the Government in terms of resources and guidance is limited, and in practice, it often falls to local authorities and the local community to take the lead role in terms of resourcing the management and protection of WHSs. The Borough of Telford & Wrekin would much rather see the Government recognising the huge contribution that World Heritage Sites play in terms of tourism, education, economic benefits and shaping the very landscape of Britain and therefore to take a far more strategic and practical view regarding how it can contribute to the protection, management and promotion of WHSs.

  7.  The Borough of Telford & Wrekin would advocate that, as in other countries, DCMS should take a lead role and have a more realistic budget for this work. This would recognise that local authorities do not have the financial resources (and sometimes do not have access to the necessary skills) to deliver major conservation and protection measures. In the case of Ironbridge Gorge, this includes flood defence and land slippage remediation measures, which would cost in excess of £33 million.

Roles and Responsibilities for Local Government and Other Stakeholders

  8.  World Heritage Sites, particularly those in an urban or semi-urban environment, often involve large numbers of statutory bodies, as well as strong community and heritage bodies. It is important that Management Plans reflect this diversity and acknowledge the benefits that each can bring to sustaining the WHS. As we have indicated above, we believe that central Government could and should play a stronger role than they have done so to date.

  9.  In the case of the Borough of Telford & Wrekin, the local authority is responsible for the full range of functions and services within the Ironbridge Gorge World Heritage Site. In order to ensure that the site functions as a sustainable community and can also accommodate large numbers of visitors as well as preserving the site's archaeology and townscape, the local authority has had to divert a considerable level of resource to the management of the WHS.

The Forthcoming Heritage White Paper

  10.  The publication of a White Paper by DCMS affords an important opportunity for the Government to address the funding and management of World Heritage Sites. We would hope that the Government would take this opportunity to set out a clear management and funding structure for World Heritage Sites across England, with corresponding policies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

  11.  We request also that the White Paper should introduce a new statutory designation for World Heritage Sites which would reinforce the significance of such sites and the importance of ensuring their protection. By definition, World Heritage Sites are of Outstanding Universal Value, that is, their value is for humankind rather than a single nation, region or community. These sites therefore sit at the top of the "heritage hierarchy". Despite this, within the UK, at present, World Heritage Sites have no statutory recognition within legislation, unlike for example, National Parks or Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Planning Policy

  12.  WHS areas in England are covered by a multitude of Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs). In the case of Ironbridge Gorge, these include PPG9 (Nature Conservation), PPG13 (Transport), PPG15 (Planning and the Historic Environment), PPG16 (Archaeology) and PPG21 (Tourism). PPG15 sets out the role of local authorities in a planning context and instructs them to develop specific policies to protect World Heritage Sites. The WHS is also covered by Local Plans and Regional Plans for the area. With such a multitude of Plans and Guidance covering relatively small areas, clearer guidance and a rationalisation of guidance would assist in the delivery of site management plans. Planning policy should give special protection to World Heritage Sites, but also recognise that many operate as functioning, sustainable communities. It is important that local authorities have the capacity and finances to ensure these planning criteria are being met. As already stated, the forthcoming Heritage White Paper presents an opportunity to clarify the statutory status of WHSs.

Conservation Skills

  13.  In view of the unique historical significance of WHSs, it is vital that the highest conservation standards are applied to the sites both in relation to the preservation and protection of existing features and also in relation to new development within the sites. Local authorities often do not have the full range of conservation skills and resources required to maintain World Heritage Sites to this standard. Buying such skills in can be costly and we would welcome greater acknowledgement of the costs involved to local authorities and other bodies to undertake this work.

Funding

  14.  The Government should recognise the national value placed on World Heritage Sites and their contribution to national economy, learning, consciousness and creativity. The Borough of Telford & Wrekin believes that DCMS, as the lead Department for the management and oversight of World Heritage Sites, should make finance available to bodies implementing WHS Management Plans. This would ensure that their work is not hindered by short term budget issues and can deliver costly major infrastructure or preservation work.

Access

  15.  Access is an important element of World Heritage Sites. We believe that it is vital that, in co-ordination with local communities and subject to the protection of the heritage, World Heritage Sites remain as accessible (physically and intellectually) as possible, and moreover, should function as thriving, sustainable communities wherever practicable.

WHS Awareness Raising

  16.  Within the UK, World Heritage is not a well known or widely recognised concept or "brand". It is one of the obligations of the WH Convention to present WHS and to inform and educate communities about the concept of World Heritage. This Council is of the view that more could be done at national, regional and local levels to achieve this. Locally, the Borough of Telford & Wrekin seeks to raise awareness through a variety of means, including newsletters, events, schools work etc. This work would be assisted and strengthened by more high profile promotional activity at national level. It is considered that if more people understood the concept of World Heritage and the importance of World Heritage Sites, this would stimulate greater civic pride in these areas and then, in turn, better standards of care and protection.

World Heritage Sites at risk

  17.  There are a number of WHSs within the UK where the long term future of the Sites is under threat. For example, the affects of land instability, coastal erosion, flooding etc. Dealing with these threats is generally beyond the means of the local communities within which these Sites are located. The State Party (national government) has accepted the responsibility for ensuring the ongoing protection of World Heritage within its territory and therefore the primary responsibility for ensuring the protection of these Sites should rest with the State Party, working closely with Site owners, local authorities and local organisations.

  18.  The Ironbridge Gorge WHS is at risk because of the inter-related threats of flooding and land instability. This Council is working with national, regional and local partners to assemble a funding package to provide a long-term solution to these problems. It is considered that the DCMS, the Government Department with primary responsibility for WH, could be more proactive in working with other Government Departments to seek and identify a solution to the threats facing the Ironbridge Gorge.

CONCLUSION

  19.  World Heritage Sites are unique, irreplaceable assets. Protecting their long term future for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations is a national responsibility. The cost of such protection will be considerable—but so will the benefits, including the protection of unique historical environments and vibrant tourist industries, as well as the development of sustainable communities within their boundaries. The Borough believes that the Government should recognise its role as national champion of World Heritage Sites and facilitate their protection with additional resources and by playing a more active role in safeguarding their future.

19 January 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 19 April 2006