Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-159)

MR PETER EWINS

23 MAY 2006

  Q140  Mr Jones: The obvious question is: why did it fail? I naively thought that you left when you left the MoD, so it is perfectly good question. Tell us why it failed?

  Mr Ewins: Why it failed is a story that will take rather longer than we have got this morning.

  Mr Hancock: Try us with the abridged version?

  Q141  Chairman: Can you tell us, in headline form, your view as to why weatherXchange failed?

  Mr Ewins: I can. I think the all-important relationship between the key players is that the joint venture broke down. There was loss of confidence between the various parties and, as a result of that, weatherXchange was unable to raise the finances that it needed to see it through its initial phases and, as a result, it went into liquidation.

  Q142  Mr Jones: That will not do. It is a great civil servant answer.

  Mr Ewins: It is not meant to be.

  Mr Jones: It is. I am sorry. We have to ask (1) who the key partners were, (2) why did they breakdown and (3) what was the trust that clearly broke down between them? If you were Chairman all this time you obviously know a lot more than you are willing to tell this Committee today?

  Q143  Chairman: If you ask the questions, Mr Ewins may well give us the answers. Who were the key partners?

  Mr Ewins: There was the Met Office, there was Zions Bank, there was BHP Billiton and Cindy Dawes, I have forgotten the title of her group.

  Q144  Chairman: The relationship broke down between which of those partners?

  Mr Ewins: Between the Met Office and Cindy Dawes and her associates, probably between Zions Bank and the rest, and I will stop there.

  Mr Jones: The Met Office was you?

  Q145  Mr Hancock: No, he had left.

  Mr Ewins: No, at the stage where it broke down I was not the Chief Executive of the Met Office.

  Q146  Mr Jones: But were you the MoD's representative on the Board?

  Mr Ewins: No.

  Q147  Mr Jones: What were you then?

  Mr Ewins: I was Chairman of the Board, elected by all the constituent Directors of the Board.

  Q148  Mr Jones: Did you get paid for that?

  Mr Ewins: I did not get paid as Chairman. I got paid expenses and costs.

  Q149  Mr Jones: This is intriguing, chairman. You left Met Office as Chief Executive.

  Mr Ewins: It was at the request of all the parties that I was invited to stay on as Chairman of the Board of weatherXchange, that is the Met Office, Cindy Dawes and associates and Zions Bank. Indeed, I would go further than that, I would say that it was seen as an important aspect of the future of weatherXchange that I should be in that position.

  Q150  Chairman: Yet, although you had left the Met Office, you were being paid as Chairman of weatherXchange no more than costs and expenses.

  Mr Ewins: Formally I was not paid to be Chairman. I was Chairman, but my expenses in my relationship with weatherXchange were recoverable, yes. I was paid a per diem rate.[2]


  Q151 Chairman: Although you had originally been appointed to weatherXchange as a director and, as Chairman, as a representative of the Met Office, once you had left the Met Office, am I right in saying you were no longer a representative of the Met Office or of the MoD?

  Mr Ewins: Absolutely. That was an essential feature. To get the time-line right, before Zions Bank came into weatherXchange as a partner, an investment appraisal was carried out by the Met Office as to whether it was a sensible thing to do. That investment appraisal came to an end almost at the time I left the Met Office. Because of that, I declined to make a decision about the future of weatherXchange, leaving that to my successor. My understanding is that my successor and his people at the Met Office came to the conclusion that it was a sound investment, and further investment followed. That brought in the Zions Bank investment at the same time. So when I left the Met Office and was invited to stay on as Chairman in my own right, the funding for the future of weatherXchange had been assured, and that was funding from the Met Office and by bringing Zions Bank into the picture.

  Q152  Mr Jones: You were a civil servant, were you not, when you were in the Met Office?

  Mr Ewins: Absolutely.

  Q153  Mr Jones: Did you get clearance, when you left the Met Office, to go and work basically in a commercial organisation which any senior civil servant, if they left, would have to do? Did the MoD or Whitehall or somebody in the Civil Service clear you for that?

  Mr Ewins: No. Let me explain. I was not cleared, and the reason was that it was unclear whether I needed to be or not, and this was not established until weatherXchange was in decline that that decision was made. The reason for that was that I was invited to stay on by the Met Office, as well as others, and it was seen to be a continuation of the job I had already held and not a new appointment.

  Q154  Mr Hancock: When it was set up, you said earlier that the expertise that the others brought was their knowledge of the market place?

  Mr Ewins: Yes.

  Q155  Mr Hancock: How did that manifest itself in the early days then?

  Mr Ewins: Because that was the way by which the business came into weatherXchange.

  Q156  Mr Hancock: But where were the main customers for your operation?

  Mr Ewins: In the financial institutions in terms of derivatives, etcetera.

  Q157  Mr Hancock: So they came fairly thick and fast, did they?

  Mr Ewins: No, they did not come thick and fast. The market place for this kind of work had mushroomed in the States. It had not really taken off in the UK at all, but we believed it would do. The partners, and this was Cindy Dawes and others, had knowledge of that market place, and slowly, more slowly than we would have liked, the business began to grow, but it did not grow as fast as we would have liked it to have done, and that was part of the reason why weatherXchange failed, but only part of the reason.

  Q158  Chairman: Was it the experience of what had happened in the United States that caused the Met Office to go into this partnership in the first place, because you saw an opportunity which was not being exploited in this country where the best meteorological advice was available?

  Mr Ewins: It did not cause us to do it, the cause came from an approach, but when we did the investment appraisal, that was a very strong element, the fact that there was a potential market place in the UK and Europe which had not been tapped into.

  Q159  Mr Jones: The relationship broke down, you said, between the Met office and Cindy Dawes. Who at that point was the Met Office's representative on the Board? It was not you, was it?

  Mr Ewins: No, it was not me.


2   Note by Witness: The per diem rate was £350 when working on behalf of weatherXchange, which included chairing Board Meetings. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 26 July 2006