Select Committee on Defence Seventh Report


6  Small and Medium-size Enterprises and the supply chain

Overview

67. The DIS states that "around 165,000 people are directly employed in defence manufacturing in the UK, with a further 135,000 people employed indirectly in supply chain activity".[125] The role of Small and Medium-size Enterprises (SMEs) and the supply chain was identified as a key issue in many of the submissions which we received. Table 5 provides examples of the issues identified.

Table 5: Issues identified about SMEs and the supply chain
Issues identified about SMEs and the supply chain
Society of British Aerospace Companies "DIS will be welcomed less readily by companies in the supply chain removed from direct supply to MoD and by smaller companies who may have been inhibited from entry into the defence market…. Some will see DIS as concerned essentially with the relationship between MoD and the primes. There will be concern about the risk of more vertical integration in the supply chain. MoD could usefully revisit the supply chain Codes of Practice that it launched under Smart Acquisition to improve supply chain relationships, as the principles there set out remain valid".[126]
Defence Manufacturers Association "A key interest for the DMA…. Is how the opportunities for and benefits from supply chains, equipment suppliers and SMEs are to be maximised. Many of the companies involved have key technologies and innovation to offer. It is to everyone's advantage that they, too, are treated as being integral to the successful implementation of the DIS".[127]
English Regional Development Agencies "Whilst the identities of the largest defence contractors are well known, there is more limited visibility of the long supply chain which is an under utilised source of innovative solutions to issues facing the MoD. The RDAs feel there is a need for a cross-sector supply chain analysis of the industry and would be receptive to exploring ways of participating in such work".[128]
Professor Keith Hartley, Centre for Defence Economics, University of York "Supply chains are recognised by the DIS, but MoD and DTI need much more data on the extent and complexity of such supply chains in the UK DIB [Defence Industrial Base]".[129]
Northern Defence Industries "There must be more understanding of the world that is inhabited by the SME supply chain…. the primes need to be aware of what the SME community can do to help them continually achieve long term business success…. The agile - and therefore most capable - SMEs will have tired of waiting. More than just the innovation they are widely recognised as bringing to the party will no longer be available for defence purposes. They will have discovered new markets - and moved on".[130]
Farnborough Aerospace Consortium "Whilst the DIS makes reference to improving collaboration between the MoD Primes and SMEs, it does not offer the structural changes to the contracting route necessary to ensure retention of a highly innovative and agile indigenous supply chain".[131]

SMEs and the supply chain

68. There have been press reports that SMEs are becoming frustrated with dealing with UK-based prime contractors. One article reported that a Managing Director of an SME had said that "Bit by bit we are giving up and gravitating towards other sectors, like the oil industry" and concluded that "if the DIS is to create a UK industrial base…. it needs to draw the UK SME base into the process in a fundamental way as well".[132]

69. The Chairman of DIC did not have concerns about SMEs gravitating to other sectors and argued that the DIS should help SMEs by providing greater transparency about the opportunities that are available.[133] In his view, the most important thing for SMEs was to have a successful domestic industry, as for many SMEs their route to market was through the primes, or the sub-primes, or the major integrators.[134]

70. The Minister believed it was vitally important to improve the way in which the MoD and larger defence companies worked with SMEs. He told us that:

    I think there is a dual responsibility, which is clearly set out in the DIS. There is a responsibility on Government, on the Ministry of Defence, to actively work to find ways to provide the clarity and transparency in an efficient way that small companies, who do not have the resources of larger companies, can digest and manage effectively, but there is an equal responsibility on the part of the larger companies, who are often their route to market, to provide that clarity too".[135]

71. Larger companies were to be assessed by the MoD on the knowledge they had about their own supply chains.[136] The MoD was also seeking to make itself more "user-friendly" to SMEs: its website now allowed small companies to make contact if they considered that they had a service or product which might be of interest to the MOD.[137] Lord Drayson acknowledged that in many areas of defence capability there were some vitally important SMEs, but that the MoD needed to increase its visibility of these.[138]

72. The Minister told us that the MoD was placing a considerable amount of its defence contracts with SMEs, and that the proportion of its contracts place with such companies, exceeded "the proportion of contracts which the Government would like to see placed with small, medium-sized companies".[139]

73. A common concern relayed to us was that the MoD did not have sufficient knowledge of the defence supply chain. Professor Hartley told us that the DIS recognised the role of supply chains, but he considered that the MoD and the DTI knew very little about the complexity and extent of supply chains. He thought the knowledge was reasonably good at the first tier level, but that there was very little knowledge about the second and third level and "how important some of these suppliers might be towards providing so-called key defence industrial capabilities".[140]

74. There are indications that improvements are being made. The Secretary of the DIC considered that both industry and MoD had taken a greater interest in supply chain relationships and supply chain management in recent years, and that the DIS had given "tremendous clarity for supply chain improvement programmes".[141] But the MoD was only at "the start of a journey" in terms of understanding supply chains and how to manage them.[142]

75. The DTI was working with Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) and with the devolved administrations to understand better the supply chains and to look at performance across the supply chain. It was acknowledged that some of the supply chains were very large and very complicated.[143] The English Regional Development Agencies told us that:

    Whilst the identities of the largest defence contractors are well known, there is more limited visibility of the long supply chain which is an under utilised source of innovative solutions to issues facing the MoD. The RDAs feel there is a need for a cross-sector supply chain analysis of the industry and would be receptive to exploring ways of participating in such work.[144]

76. We note that the MoD has sought to become more "user friendly" to Small and Medium-size Enterprises which are a vital part of the UK defence industry. We look to the MoD to improve its visibility of such companies.

77. We are concerned that the MoD is only at "the start of a journey" in terms of understanding supply chains and how to manage them. We note that the MoD is working with the DTI, the Regional Development Agencies and the agencies of the devolved administrations to understand defence supply chains better. We expect this work to be progressed quickly and good practice to be identified and promulgated.

78. We consider issues relating to the opportunities for SMEs to compete for the work underlying long-term partnering arrangements at paragraph 94.


125   Cm 6697, para A4.6 Back

126   Ev 82 Back

127   Ev 92 Back

128   Ev 95 Back

129   Ev 104 Back

130   Ev 107 Back

131   Ev 116 Back

132   Jane's Defence Weekly, 4 January 2006, p 11 Back

133   Q 230 Back

134   Q 234 Back

135   Q 277 Back

136   Ibid Back

137   Ibid Back

138   Q 278 Back

139   Q 279 Back

140   Q 163 Back

141   Q 232 Back

142   Q 233 Back

143   Ibid Back

144   Ev 95 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 10 May 2006