Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


APPENDIX A

RAND OBSERVATIONS ON THE NUCLEAR SUBMARINE DESIGN SKILLS BASE (1)

  "Gaps in design and production can lead to the departure of experience personnel to other industries and to the erosion of defence system production skills."

  "The submarine design base is rapidly eroding. Demand for the design and engineering resources is declining as the design of the first of class nears completion. The number required will be fewer than that needed to sustain a viable nuclear submarine design base."

  "To sustain the UK's nuclear submarine design expertise, some minimum core of professionals must continuously work in that area. The number required varies with the domain of expertise. The total number required across all domains is approximately 200. The workforce could drop below this critical level in the near future without a new design programme."

  "There are options for sustaining the 200-person submarine design core, the ideal way would be to soon commence the design effort for a new class of submarines. No decision have been made regarding any programmes beyond the Astute class. The current Vanguard SSBN class could begin retiring as early as 2018. Design of a follow-on SSBN class would have to start approximately 15 years prior to the desired in-service date for the replacement submarines. The design for a follow-on class would have to begin immediately. The Astute-class design would have to begin some 10 years in advance of delivery of the first of class."

  "There may still be a period of time when the design core is inadequate in at least some of the specialties required to sustain expertise. How might the design core be sustained through periods of slack demand? There are several possibilities:

    —    Evolution of the Astute design as more boats are built to take advantage of new technologies.

    —    Continuous work on conceptual designs for new submarine classes, whether or not those classes are ever built.

    —    Design of unmanned undersea vehicles."

  "These options could be exercised simultaneously. However, taken together, they could not by themselves adequately sustain a submarine design core."

  "Collaboration with the United States or another submarine-producing country should also be considered. Design work on each country"s submarine programmes could help sustain the other's design core."

  "A core of 200 designers, engineers, and draughtsmen would require annual funding of perhaps £15 million."

 (1)   Rand Europe 2005, Volume 1 of The UK's Nuclear Submarine Industrial Base: Sustaining Design and Production Resources.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 30 June 2006