Select Committee on Education and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Contact a Family

  Contact a Family provides support, advice and information to families with disabled children across the UK. Each year, our helpline and information services assist over 18,000 parents.

  Of our enquiries around 1,500 each year concern Special Educational Needs. Contact a Family does not take a particular stance on the mainstream vs. special school debate, but seeks to advise and assist parents in an impartial manner to obtain whatever kind of placement they believe will best meet their child's particular needs.

  We also seek to enable parents' voices to be heard by policy makers and to report to policy makers on the concerns that parents express to us. In this way we hope to have a positive influence on legislation and practice.

  As part of this, we regularly undertake surveys and research with parents to inform our policy work. In January 2003, Contact a Family carried out a web based survey of parents visiting the Contact a Family website and invited them to tell us about their experiences of the education system and whether they felt that their children had been discriminated against at all.

  In total 1,688 parents visiting the Contact a Family website completed the questionnaire. The results are as follows:


What sort of school is attended?

Child at mainstream school
52%
Child at special school22%
Child at special unit5%
Child in residential school3%
Other/not given18%
Age of child

3-5
20%
6-819%
9-1121%
12-1624%
17-195%
Not Given11%
How satisfied are you with the overall quality of your child's education?

Very satisfied
25%
Quite satisfied27%
Not sure/not given29%
Quite dissatisfied11%
Very dissatisfied8%
How well does your child's teacher understand your child's needs?

Very well
26%
Quite well24%
Not sure/not given23%
Not very well18%
Not at all9%
Does your child get all the extra help they need to make the most of schooling?

Definitely yes
23%
Probably yes21%
Not sure/not given21%
Probably not22%
Definitely not13%
Has your child been discriminated against in the education system?

Definitely yes
17%
Probably yes17%
Not sure/not given30%
Probably not19%
Definitely not16%
How aware do you think you are about disability discrimination laws in education?

Very aware
17%
Quite aware20%
Not sure/not given27%
Not very aware24%
Very unaware12%


  It is disappointing, but perhaps not surprising, that only a third of parents could describe themselves as very or quite aware of laws around disability discrimination in education and that a third felt that their child had probably or definitely been discriminated against at school.

  We also undertook an exercise to look at all enquiries on education which have been made to the helpline this year January-August 2005 in order to be able to inform the Committee what the current issues for parents are. The Committee needs to bear in mind that parents would not telephone a helpline to report that all was going well with their child's education. The cases reported below are therefore only representative of those parents who are in some form of difficulty with their child's education.

Total associations between enquiries and keywords (within date range)
Education general183
Education general183
Choosing A School 28
Disability Discrimination and Education 17
Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) 18
Educational Assessment 47
Exclusion From School 12
Funding 9
Further Education 4
Gifted Children 1
Home Based Education 12
Hospital Education 0
Inclusive Education 4
Parent Partnerships 80
Portage 1
Post 16 Transition in Scotland (factsheet) 9
SEN-England (factsheet) 131
SEN-Scotland (factsheet) 9
SEN-Wales (factsheet) 6
Sencos 0
Special Educational Needs Tribunals 13
Special Schools/Special Education 56
Statementing/Record Of Needs 41
Teaching Methods 0
Transition (Education) 16
Transition in England and Wales (factsheet) 47
Total enquiries for Education744


  Of the 744 enquiries for education, we looked in more detail at 94 enquiries where a detailed response was required and we have more complete information in the form of a case record.

20 of these concerned getting insufficient support at mainstream school

  For example: A 12-year-old with ADHD was finding his parents' separation difficult to cope with. There had been a history of domestic violence and the mother had fled to a refuge. The son missed quite a bit of school and is now finding it very hard to settle back in to school. Mother has asked the school for support for him but the school aren't even prepared to listen, let alone do anything to help the son. Mother is now seeking an assessment

Four getting insufficient help at special school

  For example: A 13-year-old boy at special school has been told he is "too large" to go swimming with the other school children unless his dad comes to put him in the hoist as he is too heavy to lift. Parents are very concerned as he is a wheelchair user and this is the only exercise he gets.

10 cases where the LEA refused to issue a statement

  For example: A five-year-old girl was displaying severe behavioural difficulties, lighting fires, cutting through electric cables at home and was disruptive and aggressive at school and violent towards both children and adults. Parents have tried using behaviour strategies but to no effect. Mother dreads going to pick her up from school for fear of being told of yet another incident. There was a discussion with the school about a referral to educational psychology but nothing has happened yet. Despite all these issues, a statement has so far been refused. The family are considering an appeal.

10 cases where the parent was looking for funding for a private placement

  For example: daughter with learning difficulties had been attending mainstream, LEA were considering statementing and parents decide she would be better in and independent school. The family are paying an additional amount on top of the feed for additional learning support. This is a struggle and parent wanted advice about whether there were any funding streams which would contribute towards the costs of this.

Nine cases where the parent had not understanding the statementing process

  For example: A family were moving from Northern Ireland to the East Midlands. In Northern Ireland they were getting excellent support for their daughter who has visual impairment and other physical disabilities including arthritis. The new school they had chosen had said they could meet her needs. However the LEA have now said that in their opinion the daughter has no additional support needs and can manage perfectly well without assistance. Family are unaware of English law and practice regarding statementing process and wanted information about appeals.

Five cases of severe bullying

  For example: A single father bringing up a son with autism. He was attending a mainstream school and moved up to the local comprehensive at age 11. He was being bullied several times a day and was taken to accident and emergency on one occasion. His psychologist wrote to the school to ask them to intervene but the school still denied there was a problem. The child attempted suicide mid way through year 7. The child received no education for over a year and now receives one day per week home tuition.

Three cases where the school was lacking information on dealing with a disability or medical condition

  For example: A school requested information on a condition which causes delayed toilet training. The school had been minded to refuse entry to the child until she was toilet trained, unless her mother would come to the school to clean and change her whenever required, and only agreed to reconsider when we pointed out that this may well be viewed as disability discrimination.

Three cases where the parent was considering or undertaking home schooling or tuition

  For example: Mother phoned up about a teenage daughter in London with systemic lupus. She receives home tuition combined with part time attendance at school as she is sometimes very ill. She is flourishing on this system and expects to get good GCSE grades. Home tuition will finish at the end of GCSE year and the LEA say they do not provide it for 16-18 year olds under any circumstances. Contact a Family subsequently confirmed with the LEA that this is indeed their position. Daughter wants to continue in education until at least age 18. Parents want to challenge the LEA as this in effect means that seriously ill pupils cannot receive an A level education.

10 cases where the child had been excluded, or was under threat of exclusion

  For example: An 11-year-old boy in Greater Manchester with ADHD had been excluded five times since transferring to secondary school. The transition seems to have unsettled him, as he had never been excluded from primary school. He is currently on a four week exclusion. He is statemented and receives 17 hours of support per week but school want more support. The LEA refused and the school said he cannot come back without the additional hours of support they think he needs.

Two enquiries about the availability of particular courses

  For example: A young deaf woman with moderate learning difficulties had been doing a drama course at 6th form which she was enjoying. The course was cancelled and as a result the young woman had started to self harm and express suicidal thoughts.

Six cases about home school travel

  For example: A parent rang concerning her son's taxi journey to school. The same firm has been taking him for six years and he has developed a good relationship with the staff. The LEA has put the contract up for competitive tender and the mother has been told by the taxi firm that they did not get the contract. Mother has heard nothing from LEA, has not been consulted and the school term is due to end in a couple of weeks, leaving her uncertain what will happen after the summer. Her son is on his third school in eight years-the other two having been closed and this is the one aspect of his schooling that has some consistency.

12 cases of parents struggling to choose between mainstream or special school or having difficulties with moving between schools

  For example: A family in the South West were very concerned about making a choice as to where their child went to school. They do not have a clear understanding of what the differences might be between a mainstream school and a special school and what kind of support and help their child would receive in each. They said that the mainstream teachers seemed terrified of their son and when they were shown the "special needs department" it appeared to be two very dark rooms in the basement. But then an educational psychologist said that they were veering towards choosing mainstream for their own benefit, "to feel that their child was normal". Parents are now very confused and unsure what is the best option.

  All of these examples illustrate the kinds of problems which parents have with the complex processes around Special Educational Needs. In many cases, the parent simply does not understand the process, what their rights are and the timescales which need to be adhered to. Contact a Family produces information factsheets for parents which explain the law and the processes which apply. Samples are enclosed for the Committee's information.

  In other cases, parents say that they find the school or the LEA obstructive, trying to save money and certainly not thinking creatively about how they could meet the child's needs. It will doubtless be some considerable time before the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act are understood and the culture of disability equality is firmly embedded in everything that is done for a child and his or her family.

  In other cases, lack of staff means long waits for appointments such as Educational Psychology or Speech Therapy. Parents feel very anxious that early chances for their child's behaviour or language to improve are slipping away as the months go on.

  The evidence from our helpline is that the current drive to move away from statements is not welcomed by parents who value having set out what their child's rights are. We feel that on the evidence from our helpline it will be a long time before parents feel confident enough in the goodwill of the school and LEA not to feel the need to have a statement.

  When we talk to parents at support groups, social events and workshops they give us the following key messages:

  They strongly feel that the emphasis should be on the potential and achievements of pupils with disabilities. There are educational, social and moral grounds for educating disabled children alongside their peers but inclusion needs to be properly supported. Statementing doesn't always deliver the specialist support their children need. This often has to be hard-fought for and parents describe constant battles with authority and bureaucracy. There is some concern that special schools can't offer a broad curriculum, have limited academic focus and are isolated and isolating, over protective and stigmatising.

  Some parents feel that special schools provide an environment that is more able to deliver health and intimate personal care and more tolerant of behaviour difficulties. Smaller class sizes are very important to some parents who feel that their child would not, or has not been able to cope, in the larger and busier environment of a mainstream school. Some have found that staff in mainstream schools have negative attitudes. Some parents believe that league tables may affect mainstream schools attitudes to pupils with SEN. They also tell us that schools are reluctant to accept children without statements. Statements are seen as a "dowry". Some parents also tell us of horrific examples of bullying of pupils who are "different".

  Placements certainly need to be flexible and support the return to mainstream school when appropriate. Most parents agree that some places need to be reserved for intensive intervention and some those with the most complex needs.

September 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 July 2006