Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The Down's Syndrome Association

INTRODUCTION

  Down's syndrome is the most common form of single learning disability. There are an estimated 16,000 school-age children with Down's syndrome across the UK.

  The Down's Syndrome Association was founded in 1970 as a small parent-led organisation. It is now a national charity with around 19,000 members and regional offices in Northern Ireland and Wales.

  As the DSA has grown, certain issues have come to the fore. The move towards inclusion—strongly supported by the Association—has ensured that education issues have dominated our work in recent years.

  Increasingly, we are concerned at the thousands of enquiries we receive every year highlighting specific educational problems. The requests for help have developed a familiar ring as parents have reported difficulties in getting appropriate Statements of Special Educational Needs, obtaining speech and language therapy, or battling for a real choice between mainstream and special schools.

  This submission reports on the results of a survey which was undertaken by the Association in March 2004. The aim of the survey was to obtain a realistic account of the perceptions of parents of children with Down's syndrome with regard to obtaining appropriate educational provision (including appropriate school placements).

  A questionnaire was sent to 5,000 parent members who were recorded as having at least one child with Down's syndrome between the ages of two and 19 in their family. Where more than one child was involved, parents were asked to fill in more than one questionnaire.

  A total of 1,500 replies were received and analysed, with the results published in May 2004 under the title: "Access to Education—a report on the barriers to education for children with Down's syndrome." Many of the issues discussed fall under the headings chosen by the Committee in their invitation for submissions, and we have summarised our findings according to these headings. However, full copies of the report can be made available, if Committee members would find them useful.

1.   Provision for SEN pupils in mainstream schools

  1.1  67% of primary age children and 27% of secondary age children were in mainstream schools.

  1.2  Most parents were happy with their child's mainstream placement, with only 2.2% of parents with children in mainstream schools reporting that they would like a move to special school.

  1.3  56% of parents of children in mainstream schools said that they would like more support for their child.

  1.4  69% rated their child's support staff as "excellent" or "very good" although many comments showed concern about lack of training forteaching assistants.

  1.5  36% of parents reported that there was no quantification of provision in their child's Statement.

  1.6  With regard to speech and language therapy provision, 62% of parents reported that speech and language therapy was recorded under Part 6, rather than under Part 3, with the result that the there was no duty on any public body actually to "arrange" the therapy.

  1.7  72% of parents reported that their child's speech and language therapy had not been quantified on the Statement.

  1.8  66% of parents felt that the speech and language therapy being provided for their child actually met their needs.

  1.9  DSA recommendations:

  1.9.1  In the short term, the DSA believes that specialist information and training should be made available to teachers and support assistants. In the long term, a nationally recognised qualification should be made available for LSA's with a dedicated unit on the specific learning profile of children with Down's syndrome.

  1.9.2  The problem of shortage of speech and language therapists needs to be addressed, but in the meantime the Government should make clear that LEAs must buy-in from the private sector when this is necessary in order to "arrange" the special educational provision on a child's Statement. It should be made clear to LEAs that speech and language therapy for children with Down's syndrome is in 99.9% of cases an educational need, and should therefore almost always be included under Part 3 of a Statement. Also, it is a stable need (ie not liable to unexpected or rapid change) and therefore should normally be quantified.

2.   Provision for pupils in special schools

  31% of parents of children in special schools reported that they believed their child needed more help than they were getting.

  2.1  Most parents were happy with these placements, with only 2% saying that they would like a change to a mainstream school.

  2.2  11.6% of parents preferring a move said they would prefer a unit within a mainstream school.

  2.3  The difficulties with regard to speech and language therapy when children are in mainstream schools are also experienced by parents whose children are in special schools.

3.   Raising standards of achievement

  3.1  Parents' comments suggest that there is a general problem of low expectations for children with Down's syndrome eg:

    "The attitude is complacent and the comment: `He is doing very well for a Down's boy' sums it up.'"

    "My experience on the whole, with people, is that wherever we go people assume he is far less able than he is."

  3.2   Increased training for Learning Support Assistants is relevant to the issue of raising standards (see 1.3, above).

4.   The system of Statements

  4.1  The vast majority of children with Down's syndrome eventually receive a Statement of Special Educational Needs, but 33% of parents reported that they had experienced difficulties in getting a Statement for their child.

  4.2  43% of parents said their Statement was not written in an acceptable way when they received it at the proposed stage.

  4.3  The comment with regard to lack of specification under 1.6, above, is relevant to parents' views on Statements. Unfortunately, the significance of "quantification" may not become apparent until too late:

    "When we received our Proposed Statement we were asked if it was    acceptable to us. Never having seen a Statement before we said yes. Now three years on we have a seven year old with severe speech problems and no provision within his Statement for specific speech therapy."

  4.4  DSA recommendations:

  4.4.1  It is unacceptable that so many parents have to struggle at proposed Statement stage to get a Statement which makes clear how much help their child is entitled to. It is equally unacceptable that parents have to threaten to, or in some cases actually have to, appeal to the Tribunal in order to get their child's provision quantified on their Statement. Parliament intended LEAs to be under a duty to produce Statements which protected children's special educational provision. Vaguely written Statements do not do that. Action needs to be taken against LEAs that persistently fail to fulfil their duties towards children with special educational needs and we ask that the Select Committee recommends that the Department for Education and Skills considers this as a matter of urgency.

5.   Disability Discrimination

  5.1  Almost one third (32%) of parents reported that they had encountered discrimination or prejudice from professionals within the education service. Some of the comments made were:

    "I have encountered indifference and discrimination from the owner of the nursery. She didn't want my son to be in the Christmas nativity play and she had enough to do without having him there as well."

    "When I have spoken to Heads . . . I have had some horrible comments about Down's syndrome, for example: We have good grades here, that won't continue if your daughter comes here."

    "My main issue has been prejudice, particularly looking at Primary Schools. One teacher . . . said "Some of them can be quite violent, can't they?" Another comment was "Most children with Statements go elsewhere. We once had a child with a Statement and it just didn't work."

  5.2  The amendment to the Disability Discrimination Act would seem to have had very little impact on professionals working within schools. Very few parents bring claims of discrimination against schools, opting instead to try to find a more positive and more caring school for their child. Unfortunately, this response risks encouraging schools to be unkind to children with Down's syndrome as a way of reducing their work load.

  5.3  DSA recommendation

  The Select Committee should recommend that the DfES commission research into parents' perceptions of the incidence of disability discrimination in schools, into the reasons why so few schools seem to be aware of their duties under the Act, and into the reasons why so few parents are using their right to bring a claim against a school when staff have discriminated against their child.

September 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 July 2006