Select Committee on Education and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by CfBT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  CfBT Trust Schools will work with their local community and within a strong partnership of all schools in the area to raise aspirations, expectations and the educational achievement of all members of the community.

  Our overarching commitment is to supporting the delivery of an education service, which will enable individuals, schools and communities to achieve their maximum potential.

  We firmly believe that the White Paper proposals when viewed with those reforms envisaged in the Every Child Matters and Youth Green Paper, will deliver more strategic influence to local authorities, will assure accountability at different levels will lead to greater choice for parents, better alignment of pupil performance and pupil wellbeing and will protect the interests of the most disadvantaged.

  Indeed, CfBT is already actively engaged in partnerships with local authorities in Lincolnshire, East Sussex and Lambeth, which are significantly improving outcomes for learners, including the disadvantaged.

  No one type of school or one ethos alone can serve every child's needs and interests whatever their background, their abilities, circumstances or location. The most important focus in any school is, and must be, the individual needs of its pupils. Personalisation of services can only be achieved in a system that achieves a proper balance of regulation and independence and offers flexibility and choice, within and between schools, with some freedom to innovate.

  CfBT is keenly interested in being a provider of Trust Schools. Our motivation is straightforward. CfBT's heart has always been in teaching and learning. An education trust like CfBT can currently only be involved in the provision of schooling in the UK by charging fees or providing special schools. We regret that fact and welcome the opportunity afforded by Trust Schools.

  CfBT does not accept the argument that Trust Schools will be disadvantageous for the most needy children. There is ample evidence in other aspects of social and particularly children's care that our society is blessed with an impressive supply of organisations whose bias is firmly towards those most in need. For example, looked after children, one of the categories of concern to critics of the White Paper, are often looked after by non-Government organisation. Such organisations are effectively excluded from a system in which the state is a monopoly provider.

THE ROLE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT

  A purchaser/provider split allows the purchaser, the local authority, to play a more focused role as the strategic promoter of the community interest and the body that ensures that all its citizens are well provided for. CfBT already works in effective partnership with local authorities and welcomes the clarity with which the White Paper identifies local government as the commissioner of services provided by Trust Schools.

  It is important to look at the White Paper in the light of proposals in Every Child Matters and the Youth Green Paper to understand fully the new and important role to be played by local authorities across the young people's and children's agendas, particularly as commissioner rather than provider of services. At every level there is real accountability to local authorities. The proposals in the White Paper strengthen the strategic role of local authorities.

  There has been a good deal of speculation about admissions systems. CfBT's commitment to an inclusive approach to education is not in doubt. We can demonstrate a track record working with some of the most challenging young people in the country. While we can see circumstances in which schools with a specialist approach may need greater flexibility over admission arrangements CfBT would expect to work within the current guidance on admissions, which the White Paper proposals would leave in place.

  Any change to admissions policy and the introduction of banding must be evidence-led and considerable weight should be given to evidence provided by the independent adjudicator on whether or not a change to the current system, in particular in whether giving current guidance statutory backing, would improve or reduce equity.

THE BENEFITS OF INDEPENDENCE

  Trust Schools offer two sorts of potential advantage, first in terms of independence and secondly through the collaborative opportunities.

  There is evidence from other areas of social policy over the last 20 years that the transfer from direct municipal provision to not-for-profit providers has been broadly beneficial for staff and customers alike. The more arms length relationship with government will, over time, distance teachers from political regulation of their day-to-day work. Provision by independent, not-for-profit bodies will encourage innovation and diversity.

  Although many of the most successful secondary schools exercise the full extent of the autonomy which the present system allows them, the concept of the stand alone, autonomous school is neither the only, nor necessarily the best model for school governance and management.

  The new opportunity afforded by the White Paper proposals is a larger Trust covering a number of schools. This could encourage and formalise some of the collaborative arrangements, which have begun to benefit schools in recent years. Trusts might be based on a geographical area or on a shared approach to curricular or pastoral issues.

  CfBT believes that the development of such Trusts will add diversity to the system and that, for some schools there would be merit in joining a Trust which will provide them with the security and strength of a forward looking large educational charitable trust where educational expertise and the mutual benefit of being a member of a larger Trust can be aligned for the benefit of the young people in the school.

KEY FEATURES OF CFBT TRUST SCHOOLS

Autonomy, staff empowerment and accountability

  CfBT schools will consciously seek to work in partnership with their stakeholders and in a range of collaborative activities with other schools.

  A CfBT Trust School will exercise considerable autonomy. It will be empowered to develop independently, working within a community of knowledge and practice that is developed by the leading practitioners within the Trust, found both from within schools and from the core CfBT team. Leadership is a quality we will encourage in a widely dispersed range of staff.

  The educational offer of the Trust as a whole will be driven forward by the Headteachers of the constituent schools and their key colleagues acting together. The schools will be able to draw on all the educational expertise and financial resources that CfBT can offer, to support children's wellbeing and learning. For example many schools find it difficult to get access to the up front investment which would allow them to respond innovatively to the workforce reform proposals.

  Some schools within the Trust will be facing particular challenges and an important part of the strategy for school improvement will be the extension of the capacity of successful schools to support those facing difficulties. The learning networks CfBT will establish will become a key operational way of sharing good practice, having peer assessments and building capacity.

  Accountability will be exercised through rigorous self-evaluation, self-improvement and resource allocation supported through the framework of the CfBT Trust. All CfBT Trust Schools will have a single school plan for improvement (SSIP), which will guide the development of the school.

Partnership beyond the school

  Partnership in the local community is also crucial. The school's ability to succeed will be hugely enhanced if there is a pro-education culture in the people served by the school, if parents and others are supportive of the enterprise in which the school is engaged. CfBT Trust Schools will develop an extensive array of interventions designed to foster this community support.

  In particular, CfBT schools will give top priority to engagement with parents. In part this will be achieved through formal mechanisms like Parents' Forums with clear terms of reference. But personalisation applies to parents as well as pupils and the real challenge is to engage with individual parents in such a way as to ensure that school and parents are supporting each other in the educational enterprise.

ABOUT CFBT

  CfBT is a leading education charity. For 40 years the charity has employed, trained and supported teachers. We currently work with governments on school improvement, curriculum development and teacher and school leadership training and on inspection. We are engaged directly with learners through projects working with pupils excluded from mainstream schools, the provision of education for young offenders, through the Connexions Service and through direct ownership of a group of schools and nurseries. CfBT's initial focus was overseas. We still have a strong international dimension. We have designed and delivered an extremely successful AIDS prevention programme for Kenyan schools and have a growing programme supporting schools for the poor in India.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 1 February 2006