Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100-119)

MR CHRIS BANKS AND MR MARK HAYSOM

7 NOVEMBER 2005

  Q100  Mr Wilson: Chairman, you asked at the start essentially what was the point of your organisation and Nadine asked that in another round about way, I would like to put it to you in a slightly different way from that. You are cutting your staff by a third, as I understand it, why not cut it by 100% and give the money to business, to the CBI, or the IoD or somebody that could run the organisation in the way that they want it run? Why not do it that way? Why do we need your organisation to do that?

  Mr Banks: I think what we were saying earlier—remember the main driver here—we are trying to respond to and lead the needs and aspirations of employers, of individuals locally, regionally and nationally and by sector, so it is a very complex map. We are trying to do that in a way, which is part of the LSC's role, to work with the sector—the providers, the colleges and others—to respond to that in a way that makes sense, again for the employers and the learners. It is a fine balance, is it not, I think, of those different stakeholder needs and our job is to make sure that we meet all of those. I think if you ask me which is the one that keeps me awake at night, it is the demand-led bit, personally that is the thing that we need to get right. Somehow we have to make sure that the whole system can then respond to those needs rather than just have them articulated. I think that is where this role locally, regionally and nationally comes in. It is somewhere between the demand and the supply. I like to see it at least as being led by the needs and wants of employers, individuals and communities but at the same time working with the post-16 sector to make sure we deliver it. Those are equally balanced and it is really important to keep that balance.

  Q101  Mr Wilson: I can see why there might need to be an element of national and local planning, but just convince me why there needs to be an element of regional planning?

  Mr Banks: What we do has to deliver against the regional economic strategy and the regional economic priorities.

  Q102  Mr Wilson: You are doing it because somebody else is involved in doing it?

  Mr Banks: Ultimately, when you add it all up, we have to be able to compete internationally, do we not, and so that means somehow in this we have got to be able to be brilliant locally, regionally and nationally.

  Q103  Mr Wilson: We are competing as a nation, not as individual regions.

  Mr Haysom: I think the way to look at it, from a regional perspective, if we are trying to look at it from the needs of a business or indeed of a learner, is that what we need to do across the whole region is to make sure that we are providing access to the right kind of training for those individuals and for those employers across a region because you cannot create that provision in every sub-region because that is not a terribly efficient way of doing it. You do need lots of provision everywhere but some you need to plan across the whole. Let me give you an example, one of the really interesting achievements of the Learning and Skills Council over the last few years has been the creation of Centres of Vocational Excellence and I think a number of people on the Committee will be aware of these centres. What we have done is to create networks of these Centres of Vocational Excellence across a region so employers have got the right kind of opportunities across a whole region. It is not possible to do that everywhere locally. I think you do have to take a regional view of the world. From my perspective you need something which is above local and between national and region does that, I think that is the appropriate response.

  Chairman: Possibly not in Rob's regions. You are in the South East.

  Q104  Mr Wilson: I am not convinced. What was the process you went through that made you decide to cut a third of your staff?

  Mr Haysom: We went through a huge amount of detail on this. I arrived a couple of years ago, we were in the middle of a restructuring exercise as I arrived. I have to say, it was an exercise which went on far too long and did not address the needs of the organisation because it ended up being all about cutting costs rather than getting the skills that we need. What we did this time round was to start at the very beginning and say "What is it we are here to do? How are we going to achieve this? What is the best structure?" so we have sought to reinvent the whole thing. The starting point for this is to pick up on what it is that employers are saying to us that we need to be doing, and providers saying "This is the kind of relationship we need with you" so we have taken all those inputs and built the organisation from that. The absolute starting point is to think about it as a local organisation. The essential building block for this new organisation is the local bit, what is it we need to do locally? What we need to do locally is to have a small expert team that can have the kind of discussions and dialogue that we have been talking about. They need a regional—for want of a better description—service centre to provide them with the information they require to support them in those frontline deliveries, and therefore we designed it in that way.

  Q105  Mr Wilson: Essentially you are saying you came in there and found you were delivering things in the wrong way or you could deliver them in a better way?

  Mr Haysom: Yes.

  Q106  Mr Wilson: That is what you are saying?

  Mr Haysom: We would not be doing it if we thought we were doing it absolutely the right way at the moment.

  Q107  Mr Wilson: What assessment have you done to establish that those staff cuts are going to be workable and you can deliver exactly what you need to deliver?

  Mr Haysom: We have done a huge amount of work, talking to an awful lot of people with a huge amount of experience in this light. We have designed it using their expertise. We have a whole set of criteria by which we have established how many people we need doing whatever role it is in whatever part of the country it is. That will be everything from the number of colleges that they have to talk to, the size of those colleges, the number of other training providers, the nature of the population in that area and so on. There is a matrix of all of these different things.

  Q108  Mr Wilson: Is that documented somewhere in a report or somewhere? Is it just around a need for somewhere?

  Mr Haysom: That is a curious question.

  Q109  Mr Wilson: I am trying to understand exactly what you have done in terms of written down evidence to justify the fact that you are cutting a third of your staff and where that is. You are talking in very vague terms and I want specifics.

  Mr Haysom: Forgive me, I thought I was trying to be specific, I am obviously failing in that. Of course we have done a lot of detailed analysis, of course we have got all of that in writing, that exists. We have created a business case for this in the first place.

  Q110  Mr Wilson: Have you published it?

  Mr Haysom: We have published all the detail on the Internet. Are you not aware of that?

  Mr Wilson: No, I am not aware of that, that is what I have been trying to get at.

  Chairman: If I can put you two together on that. I must stop you there. I have two colleagues who want to come in. Gordon.

  Q111  Mr Marsden: These new nine regional centres, how much power are you going to give the heads of them?

  Mr Haysom: The regional directors?

  Q112  Mr Marsden: Yes, the regional directors, how much power do you think you will give them?

  Mr Haysom: I do not intend giving them more power than they have currently. There is a line management relationship.

  Q113  Mr Marsden: You were saying earlier—I will not go through the Byzantine description of your bureaucracy that you gave us earlier again—that these reforms were designed to streamline, to make decisions quicker, to respond and all the rest of it and yet you are not proposing to give your regional directors any new powers to cut deals on their own, to deal with paperwork?

  Mr Haysom: They have those powers now.

  Q114  Mr Marsden: You are confident the powers they have at the moment will deliver the streamlined approach, the quicker response to the sector skill shortages and everything that we have been talking about?

  Mr Haysom: I am confident that if we get the structures right and get the right kind of people and the right jobs in the region then, yes.

  Q115  Mr Marsden: In which case, why do we need to have reorganisation?

  Mr Haysom: Forgive me, I have just said we need the right people doing the right things in the right places.

  Q116  Mr Marsden: You are not changing the personnel presumably?

  Mr Haysom: The regional directors?

  Q117  Mr Marsden: Yes.

  Mr Haysom: They have been in post for a little over a year.

  Q118  Mr Marsden: My colleague, Rob Wilson, has been rather sceptical about the regional aspect of this and, no disrespect, there are certain Regional Development Agencies perhaps working more coherently than others. Given that is the case, presumably you are going to want to have these people dealing very closely. If you are, then that is fine, you are saying you do not think you need to devolve the powers for the decision-making for yourselves at the centre?

  Mr Haysom: This is all about a move towards devolution from the centre.

  Q119  Mr Marsden: Sure.

  Mr Haysom: I have not used those words, forgive me, but that is very much what we are all about. The last time I was here we talked about this, and the creation of a regional tier to enable us to start to move in that direction, and this will enable us to do it still further. There are all sorts of things which are constantly being pushed down the organisation.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 12 September 2006