Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum from Trinity House

  This Memorandum contains the response of Trinity House to the invitation by the Environmental Audit Committee to organisations to seek their views on the Committee's inquiry into the new Marine Bill. In particular this Memorandum contains Trinity House's response to the questions prompted by the Consultation Paper published by DEFRA and in particular "whether due consideration is given to the many varied and often competing demands placed on the environment and, if so, how the Bill may be strengthened to rectify the omission". Trinity House welcomes the opportunity to assist the Committee in its Inquiry.

TRINITY HOUSE

  Trinity House is one of three General Lighthouse Authorities (GLAs) within the British Isles providing marine aids to navigation. Trinity House has responsibility for England, Wales and the Channel Islands. Trinity House is a corporation established by Royal Charter, although its powers as a GLA are principally derived from the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended.

  Trinity House's primary role is to deliver a reliable, efficient and cost-effective aids to navigation service for the benefit and safety of all mariners. This includes the superintendence and management of all lighthouses, buoys and beacons within its area and covers the inspection and audit of all local aids to navigation, of which there are currently some 10,000.  Additionally, our statutory responsibility for superintendence and management encompasses advising Government and determining the marking requirements that operators of offshore structures, renewable energy developments and aquaculture sites must establish in the interests of the safety of navigation. This growth area is coupled with an increase in decommissioned offshore oil and gas installations, which, where left in position, often remain a hazard to navigation and need to be marked by the relevant operator with suitable aids to navigation.

  Trinity House also has powers under the Merchant Shipping Act to mark, destroy, remove or raise wrecks that pose a navigational hazard and which lie outside areas controlled by harbour or conservancy authorities.

  Trinity House, as a marine organisation, is keen to ensure the protection of the marine environment and is certified to the ISO 14001:2004 Standard (Environmental Management Systems).

  Does the consultation paper give due consideration to the many varied and often competing demands placed on the marine environment?

  Trinity House agrees with broad objectives of marine spatial planning laid out in paragraph 8.33 of the Consultation Document. The objectives there mentioned recognise the need to achieve a balance between the competing economic, social, cultural and environmental needs in the marine environment and to create a more efficient use of the marine space available to "strike a better more considered balance, between inevitably competing pressures".

  In this regard Trinity House believes that the Bill should recognise that as an island nation there should be a balance between the importance of safety of marine navigation and the protection of the environment. A single marine casualty could undermine major environmental gains achieved over many years (for example incidents such as the Torrey Canyon, Braer and Sea Empress). Safety of navigation should therefore be a key concern in marine spatial planning and in the Bill generally.

  By way of illustration Trinity House considers that existing established economically important shipping routes should be safeguarded so that their use is not interfered with or restricted by proposed development. In particular detailed analysis of the impact on shipping routes must be considered when the location for new marine development (such as an offshore windfarm or new port facility) is considered.

  In considering the impact on shipping routes regard must also be had to the future, including the effects that the development may have on established routes. For example, sediment transfer due to the location of an offshore windfarm may eventually cause a major diversion of a current well used route.

  Another material concern is that marine spatial planning should apply equally to all UK waters in order for it to be effective. In particular a co-ordinated approach amongst devolved administrations responsible for their own respective areas must be achieved. For example certain areas of the Irish Sea could be covered by waters under the control of England, Wales and Scotland, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and the Isle of Man. Furthermore, regional plans, if taken forward under the Bill must adopt a coherent approach where they intersect between one region and its neighbour, in particular at jurisdictional boundaries.

  From the particular perspective of Trinity House as a GLA under the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, we are anxious to ensure that we are consulted at the earliest possible opportunity about the navigational marking and the implications for the mariner of all proposed marine developments in our area of responsibility. To this end Trinity House believes that it is essential that we are consulted at the marine spatial planning stage, or earlier, when development is first considered.

  Finally, we are concerned to ensure that our statutory responsibilities for, and ability to carry out, the provision and maintenance of aids to navigation, including the marking and dispersal of wrecks, should be undertaken expeditiously for the safety of all classes of mariner and the marine environment. If we were unable to respond quickly to a wreck or similar navigational hazard, the potential for serious damage to the environment could be very significant. We are anxious that the Bill should make proper provision in this regard.

June 2006


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 July 2006