Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by EDF Energy

  EDF Energy is one of the UK's largest energy companies with activities throughout the energy chain. Our interests include coal and gas-fired electricity generation, electricity networks and energy supply to end users. We have over five million electricity and gas customer accounts in the UK, including both residential and business users.

  EDF Energy welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Environmental Audit Committee's inquiry of 21 July 2006 on the Kyoto Protocol: Beyond 2012 COP12 and COP/MOP2, Nairobi 6-17 November 2006. EDF Energy is fully committed to tackling climate change and we share this commitment with our parent company EDF. We support the UK Government's ambition to move progressively to a low carbon economy and to play a leading role in the global effort to address climate change. In our view, the scientific evidence presented to date justifies action to mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

1.  INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT

  EDF Energy believes that the UK Government has shown strong leadership in global debate on climate change and is well placed to bring together key countries at the COP12 and COP/MOP2 negotiations. This ability and leadership has been demonstrated at Gleneagles, where the G8 leaders signed a communique that included a political statement and an action plan covering climate change, clean energy and sustainable development, and by the agreement between UK and China on near-Zero Emissions Coal with Carbon Capture and Storage and the recent launch of the UK-China climate change working group.

  EDF Energy encourages the UK Government to continue to show its leadership and commitment to the further development of international climate change policies and its engagement with other countries in the negotiations to determine an international emissions framework.

  We strongly support the need for an international long-term policy framework that incorporates both developed and developing countries. We believe that international commitments covering at least the next 25-30 years are fundamental to providing countries and industry with the clarity and political certainty to secure the necessary capital funding to deliver the UK Government's aspiration for mitigating climate change.

  We believe that these international commitments should be based on the ultimate objective of stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

  In the development of these commitments, we also believe that JI/CDM mechanisms must be reviewed in the context of the international targets. They are effective in transferring some capital to developing countries whilst reducing the net increase in global greenhouse gas emissions. However we should recognise that these investments are setting the carbon footprint in these countries for future decades without any recognition of the overall emissions levels and targets required to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations at sustainable levels. In that sense we need to be careful that we are not burdening countries that are developing these projects with a carbon footprint that is unsustainable in the long term.

2.  LIKELIHOOD OF INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENT

  The level of risk being taken by either the industrial investor or a national Government, in the drive to lower greenhouse gas emissions, is largely determined by the targets an individual country is willing to sign up to under international agreements. We believe that Governments are uncomfortable with the risks to which they could be exposed by unilaterally signing up to long-term binding targets. This will in turn inform investors' views on political risk associated with investments in low carbon technologies. Dealing with this risk is fundamental to the success of future international agreements on mitigating climate change.

3.  UK GOVERNMENT'S COMMITMENT

  EDF Energy believes that the UK Government and the EU must continue to show leadership in the management of climate change. It is important that the UK Government and the EU separates the need for international targets from its own responsibility to respond to the challenge of climate change and move to a low carbon economy.

  The EU ETS, as presently constituted, is not capable of sending the signals required to deliver investment in lower carbon technologies in the UK and EU. In our response to the Climate Change Programme Review and the Energy Review, we stated that the EU ETS as currently structured is not capable of underwriting the investment needed to reduce CO2 emissions in the electricity sector. The primary reason for this is that the policy timescales of the EU ETS do not match the investment life cycles of the sector and investors are unwilling to accept the political and regulatory uncertainty surrounding future CO2 abatement targets. Although considerable efforts are being made to agree long-term abatement targets across the EU (Phase III and beyond), these are unlikely to be agreed in the near future. This creates a void in political certainty and a significant hurdle for early investment in low carbon technologies.

  However, EDF Energy does believe that commercial market-based instruments can be used to underpin the significant capital investment required to lower the carbon intensity of the electricity sector. This can be done without exposing the UK Government to unacceptable financial risks by controlling the amount of CO2 reductions the Government commits to in this way. These instruments can be designed to reinforce the integrity of the EU ETS in the long term, within the framework of competitive and liberalised energy markets, as advocated by the UK Government. We have outlined how such a Carbon Hedge would work in practice in our response to the Energy Review and we would be happy to provide further details on this.

4.  CONCLUSION

  The nature of climate change and its importance places a huge responsibility on companies such as ours to work in a constructive and supportive way with Government. We strongly support the UK Government leadership and commitment to the further development of international climate change policies and its engagement with other countries in the negotiations to determine international emissions framework at COP12 and COP/MOP2.

  To successfully address climate change globally, we believe that international commitments covering the next 25-30 year incorporating both developed and developing countries are fundamental. We also do believe that the UK Government must separate the need for international targets from its own responsibility to respond domestically to the challenge of climate change and move to a low carbon economy.

Denis Linford

Director of Regulation

September 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 December 2006