Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Environmental Industries Commission (EIC)

1.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES COMMISSION (EIC)

  EIC was launched in 1995 to give the UK's environmental technology and services industry a strong and effective voice with Government.

  With over 275 Member companies, EIC has grown to be the largest trade association in Europe for the environmental technology and services (ETS) industry. It enjoys the support of leading politicians from all three major parties, as well as industrialists, trade union leaders, environmentalists and academics.

2.  PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

  As noted in our response to the Environmental Audit Committee's earlier inquiry into this issue a wide range of Government and stakeholder reports have set out the huge potential of public procurement to play a leading role in sustainable development.

  Government has slowly responded with new policies, including those set out in the Framework for Sustainable Development on the Government Estate.

  EIC's Members have, however, long reported that there are major gaps between policy and practice in this area. Most glaringly, while it has been Government policy for at least 25 years to base decisions on the whole life cost of products and services, rather than capital cost, our Members report that capital cost is still the dominant factor in most public procurement decisions.

  This conclusion was born out by the conclusions of the recent National Audit Office study into procurement which discovered the practical difficulties budget holders are having in procuring sustainably. This is a huge wasted opportunity. The Government cannot lead the world on climate change whilst failing to purchase basic energy efficiency equipment for its own offices.

  EIC therefore considers that the Government must provide detailed guidance to staff supported by a training programme on implementing sustainable procurement.

  EIC also believes Departments should be required to report any occasions where they have not purchased products that comply with the "Quick Wins" specifications published in 2003.

3.  LARGE PUBLIC SECTOR BUILDING PROJECTS

  One procurement area that stands out as failing on environmental considerations—and particularly on energy efficiency, is the Private Finance Initiative.

  EIC's Members who supply technology such as boilers and ventilation equipment report that in most cases public sector projects procure the cheapest, most polluting option, even where whole-life costs are higher than with more efficient alternatives.

  For example one Member company found that just two out of 70 public sector projects they tendered for earlier this year had specific energy efficiency requirements in the tender documentation.

  Major public building projects such as schools and hospitals will be in operation for many years and the failure to ensure they are energy efficient is a huge wasted opportunity.

  Our Members experience is in line with the findings of a survey by Construction News in February which asked 50 English local authorities for details of building and civil engineering contracts let. For contracts worth more than £3 million almost two thirds were won by lowest bidders. For contracts worth less than £3 million 9 out of 10 were won by the lowest bid.

  And the Combined Heat and Power Association has written to us to confirm that their Members suffer from the same problems in selling technology to public sector projects.

  In September 2004 the Prime Minister pledged all new schools and City Academies should be models for sustainable development. The experience of our Members suggests this is still very far from the case. We have recently written to Elliot Morley MP, Environment Minister, to raise our concerns.

  One potential mechanism to tackle this problem is through the Code for Sustainable Buildings now being developed which the Government has pledged to implement in public sector buildings. However this currently only applies to dwellings.

  EIC believes the Government should conduct an urgent review of the energy efficiency requirements in recently awarded large public sector building projects to provide a clear picture of what is currently being achieved. If this confirms that high standards of energy efficiency are not being achieved then the Government should act urgently to set out clear mandatory requirements for energy efficiency in all large public sector building projects—and to audit compliance with them. This could be achieved through the widening of the Code for Sustainable Buildings to cover commercial buildings rather than just dwellings.

1 November 2005



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 March 2006