Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Annex 1

FINANCIAL EFFECTS OF REFORM ON EUROPEAN REFINERS AND PROCESSORS EUROPEAN CANE REFINERS



  Notes

  1.  Support prices as per Commission's proposals, ie sugar €385/t, beet €25/t, cane raws €319/t.

  2.  Refining allowance and processor gross margin calculated as per worksheet in Annex 2.

  3.  Average EU market price of €725/t used, taken from Commission's Background Note No 2, September 2004.

  4.  Range of refining and processing costs taken from LMC studies.

  5.  Fixed assets per tonne of sugar taken from UK refiner and processor Annual Reports.

(C)  COMPETING IN A FULLY DEREGULATED WORLD MARKET

1.   What Determines Whether a Refiner can Compete in a Deregulated Market?

  A refiner can only compete in a fully deregulated market if its refining costs are low enough to make an adequate return from the differences ("differentials") between the cost of buying raw sugar on the world market, compared to the cost of world market white sugar delivered to the EU in merchantable quality.

  The relevant differentials for this assessment are the raw/white world sugar prices and the differences in cost of shipping and unloading white sugar compared to raw sugar.

2.   Raw/White Sugar World Price Differential

  The historic price differential on the world market between raw and white sugar is set out in Annex 1.  This data has been taken from fob quotations on the New York Board of Trade (NYBOT) raw sugar market, and the London International Financial Futures Exchange (LIFFE) white sugar market. This trend shows that the difference in price between raw and white sugar on the world market (the "whites premium") has averaged just under $65/tonne for the last 10 years.

  As these prices are quoted at the originating port ("fob"), the additional transportation and unloading costs of white sugar over raw sugar must also be taken into account to arrive at the total "refining margin" available to compete in a fully deregulated market. In addition, the prevailing market discount must also be included, to allow for the difference in originating port between the white and raw sugar markets.

3.   Shipping Costs Differential

  In a fully deregulated market the most likely source of both raw and white sugar is Brazil. No significant volumes of raw or white sugar come from Brazil to the EU at the moment, so the best comparative shipping rates are actual movements of raw sugar into Black Sea ports and white sugar cargoes into the East Mediterranean.

  The normal, and cheapest, way of shipping white sugar is to use 50kg bags transported in 14,000 tonne cargo vessels (using containers is considerably more expensive). Raw sugar is usually shipped in bulk, with a typical cargo size being 25,000 tonnes.

  Under these market assumptions, How Robinson Shipping has calculated that the differential between the transportation costs of white sugar compared to raw sugar have averaged $20/tonne over the last five years (Annex 2).

4.   Freight Discount

  Shipping movements of white sugar from Brazil attract a freight differential (normally a discount). This is because the origination point for the world white sugar market is North Europe, not Brazil. For the purpose of this analysis, Santos has been taken as the Brazilian source port.

  For the last six years, freight from Santos has attracted a discount which has averaged $13/tonne (Annex 3).

5.   Unloading Costs Differential

  Raw and white sugar prices quoted on the world market are fob, which includes handling and loading costs onto the vessel at the originating port.

  However, the unloading costs are excluded. Typical quotations for these are as follows:
$/tonne
Raw Sugar, Immingham (GP Shipping, Port Agency Services) 7
White Sugar, Immingham (JPL Stevedoring Contractors) 17

  This indicates that the raw/white differential for unloading 50kg bags is about $10/tonne (although highly automated unloading facilities would reduce this figure).

6.   Merchantable Quality for Customers

  Sugar supplies to UK industrial customers are normally transported by road, either in bulk or as 50kg bags. For those preferring 50kg bags (small and medium sized customers) there would be no additional cost.

  However for those preferring bulk supplies (typically larger customers) a small additional cost should be allowed for the cost of converting bags into bulk. A maximum figure for this additional cost would be $10/tonne.

7.   Total Refining Margin Available in a Deregulated Market

  The total margin available for a refiner to be able to compete in a fully deregulated market is therefore represented by the addition of each of the above raw/white differential costs:
$/tonne
Raw/White Sugar World Price Differential 65
Less Freight Discount (Santos Freight Differential) (13)
Shipping Costs Differential20
Unloading Costs Differential10
[Option to Convert from 50kg to Bulk Deliveries 10]
Total Available Refining Margin82-92


8.   Refining Efficiency Necessary to be Able to Compete in a Deregulated Market

  This total available refining margin must cover both the refiner's costs and a reasonable return for the business.

  The lowest acceptable level of return on total net assets to enable a business to cover its cost of capital, is likely to be 10% (this is half that suggested by Tate & Lyle in the Select Committee hearings). For European refiners, this would be equivalent to about $35/tonne of sugar.[23] [24]

  This would imply, by subtraction, that refining costs must be no higher than $47-$57/tonne (€40-€50/tonne) for a refiner to be able to compete in a fully deregulated market. If a higher return on capital than 10% is used (in their evidence Tate & Lyle said they expected 20%), then the maximum refining cost able to compete in a deregulated market becomes even smaller than this.

  Any refiner this efficient would be expected to get net margins of at least €80/tonne post-reform (see accompanying report). This would provide returns post reform much higher than any European beet processors would expect to get.

Annex 1

WORLD MARKET RAW/WHITE SUGAR PRICE DIFFERENTIALS 1995-2005


Annex 2





DateRaw WhitePremium
Aug-0026.538.0 11.5
Sep-0029.038.0 9.0
Oct-0028.039.0 11.0
Nov-0027.039.0 12.0
Dec-0026.837.0 10.3
Jan-0124.337.0 12.8
Feb-0123.037.0 14.0
Mar-0122.337.0 14.8
Apr-0125.037.0 12.0
May-0128.036.0 8.0
Jun-0125.837.0 11.3
Jul-0123.537.0 13.5
Aug-0123.038.0 15.0
Sep-0122.038.0 16.0
Oct-0122.038.0 16.0
Nov-0119.836.0 16.3
Dec-0119.036.0 17.0
Jan-0219.034.0 15.0
Feb-0219.034.0 15.0
Mar-0221.034.0 13.0
Apr-0222.037.0 15.0
May-0223.035.0 12.0
Jun-0223.036.0 13.0
Jul-0223.038.0 15.0
Aug-0223.038.0 15.0
Sep-0224.338.0 13.8
Oct-0226.040.0 14.0
Nov-0225.340.0 14.8
Dec-0224.040.0 16.0
Jan-0325.038.0 13.0
Feb-0323.536.0 12.5
Mar-0326.336.0 9.8
Apr-0328.041.0 13.0
May-0331.046.0 15.0
Jun-0329.549.0 19.5
Jul-0328.549.0 20.5
Aug-0329.549.0 19.5
Sep-0329.848.0 18.3
Oct-0333.052.0 19.0
Nov-0336.054.0 18.0
Dec-0340.561.0 20.5
Jan-0452.877.0 24.3
Feb-0462.087.0 25.0
Mar-0461.387.0 25.8
Apr-0456.087.0 31.0
May-0444.879.0 34.3
Jun-0437.077.0 40.0
Jul-0437.876.0 38.3
Aug-0440.576.0 35.5
Sep-0440.078.0 38.0
Oct-0446.883.0 36.3
Nov-0453.083.0 30.0
Dec-0454.083.0 29.0
Jan-0550.078.0 28.0
Feb-0547.078.0 31.0
Mar-0550.576.0 25.5
Apr-0553.574.0 20.5
May-0547.874.0 26.3
Jul-0536.070.0 34.0
5 Yr Avg$32.7$52.3 $19.6

Source: How Robinson Shipping

Raw Shipping in bulk. 25,000 t Cargo ($/tonne Brazil to Black Sea)

White Shipping in 50kg bags. 14,000 t Cargo ($/tonne Brazil to Eastern Mediterranean)

Annex 3

BRAZILIAN FREIGHT DISCOUNT TREND 1999-2005



(D)  EUROPEAN SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE
Now2012-13
EU Production
Quota17.412.4
Non-quota2.9Nil
Imports1.93.9
Exports(5.9)(0.6)
Total Supplies16.315.7
EU Consumption(16.3) (15.7)
EU Surplus/(Deficit)4.0 (3.3)
(Exports-Imports)

Note:  French surplus    = 2.3 million tonnes

UK consumption  = 2.0 million tonnes

Source: European Commission 2005

British Sugar

November 2005



23   Tate & Lyle total net assets taken as £250 million for their UK refining operation, from their 2004 Annual Report (£190 million fixed costs plus £60 million net operating assets). Back

24   Tate & Lyle Thames refinery capacity assumed to be 1.2 million tonnes per year. Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 22 November 2005