Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Fourth Report


1  INTRODUCTION

1. One of the core tasks of select committees is to scrutinise the expenditure of Government departments and to monitor their performance against Public Service Agreement (PSA) targets.[1] The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee carries out this task in two ways: through inquiries into particular aspects of the work of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); and by carrying out a short inquiry each year into the Departmental Annual Report.[2]

2. Defra published its Departmental Report 2005 on 16 June 2005. Helen Ghosh, the recently-appointed Permanent Secretary at the Department, accompanied by its Director-General, Environment and its Chief Operating Officer, gave oral evidence to us on 16 November 2005. Prior to the session, the Committee—with the assistance of the House of Commons Scrutiny Unit—sent a list of preliminary written questions to Defra, highlighting several of technical details in the Departmental Report. The Department's response to these preliminary questions is published as written evidence along with this report.[3] After the oral evidence session we asked Defra to respond to a number of questions we did not have time to raise during the meeting. The Department's response is also published as written evidence along with this report.[4]

Involvement of stakeholders

3. This year, we slightly changed our usual approach to this inquiry. We invited seven of Defra's major stakeholders to submit written evidence outlining their views of the Departmental Report. They were asked to consider issues such as: how user-friendly the Report is as a document, and how it could be improved; how accurately the Report reflects Defra's performance in their areas of interest over the last year; and whether the financial figures provided within the Report match up to their experience of departmental expenditure. We also asked whether stakeholders were not aware of the Departmental Report, or had never made use of it.

4. Two stakeholder organisations responded to our invitation: the Country Land and Business Association and the Campaign to Protect Rural England. Both organisations focussed on aspects of Defra policy in their written evidence, rather than the Departmental Report. Their written evidence is published with this report.[5]


1   Liaison Committee, Second Report of Session 2001-02, Select Committees: modernisation proposals, HC 692, para 16; Modernisation Committee, First Report of Session 2001-02, Select Committees, HC 224-I. Back

2   Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Sixth Report of Session 2001-02, The Departmental Annual Report 2002, HC 969; Twelfth Report of Session 2002-03, The Departmental Annual Report 2003, HC 832; and Fifteenth Report of Session 2003-04, The Departmental Annual Report 2004, HC 707. Back

3   Ev 1 Back

4   Ev 40 Back

5   Ev 55 [Country Land and Business Association]; Ev 56 [Campaign to Protect Rural England]. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 20 December 2005