Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Fourth Report


3  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Financial forecasting

8. We have previously commented on the fact that the Comptroller and Auditor General highlighted areas of weakness in Defra's 2001-02 Resource Accounts.[11] The National Audit Office had concerns about the systems of budgetary control in the Department and believed weaknesses in such control had led to a significant underspend in 2001-02. In the past three years Defra has worked hard to improve its financial management practices. In written evidence the Department told us it had "continued to develop its financial management approach" in 2004-05. For example, a new "integrated financial reporting system" had been implemented at the beginning of the year.[12] We are pleased that financial measurement has improved significantly in the past three years. We support the efforts of senior staff to improve the situation still further.

9. However, we again identified in this year's Departmental Report a number of discrepancies in figures relating to resource plans and administration costs. For example, the Departmental Report showed total public spending costs for 2003-04 were £4,996 million—a £643 million increase on the estimate for that year provided in the 2004 Departmental Report.[13] In its written evidence, Defra said the difference was caused by a combination of changed expected expenditure due to Common Agricultural Policy reform and delays in the anticipated receipts from the winding up of the Water Industry closed pension fund.[14] We identified three other similar discrepancies and asked Defra to provide explanations in its written evidence.[15] We were satisfied with all of Defra's explanations, which were reasonable and comprehensive.

10. Nevertheless, these discrepancies do indicate that Defra needs to make further improvements to its financial systems and, in particular, to its forecasting and budgeting processes. This problem is highlighted by Defra itself in its 2004-05 Resource accounts.[16] The accounts state that Defra commissioned Ernst & Young to undertake a review of the Department's planning and forecasting processes, and that Defra is in the process of implementing the review's recommendations. Improvements include "embedding a more consistent and robust approach to resource allocation, enhancing forecasting and other capabilities of financial software, undertaking more rigorous reviews of underspends, and the introduction of improved monthly financial reports to the [Management] Board".[17] In supplementary evidence, Defra said it had made "significant progress" on all the recommendations in the Ernst & Young Review, but more work was required in some areas.[18] Although financial management in general has improved within Defra, further improvements to the Department's forecasting and budgeting processes are required. The Department is currently attempting to improve its financial forecasting by implementing recommendations set out in the Ernst & Young review. We look forward to further updates from Defra about the impact of these changes on its financial forecasting. We further recommend that in future Departmental Reports, Defra provide a commentary explaining significant differences between one year's estimates and the resulting outturn.

Efficiency savings

11. The Gershon Review of Efficiency was a major component of the 2004 Spending Review.[19] As a result of the review, Defra aims to achieve £610m in annual efficiencies and 2,400 staff savings by 2007-08.[20] £299m of the £610m target will be achieved by local government, "mostly though efficiency gains on waste services".[21] In its written evidence, Defra said non-delivery of these efficiencies would "add a further pressure… given that the Department has a tight budget over the spending period". It acknowledged, however, that it had "no power" to enforce action from local government.[22]

12. In oral evidence, we pursued this matter further. We asked the Permanent Secretary and accompanying Defra officials how the Department expected to meet the efficiency savings if it had no power to enforce action from local authorities. Defra's Director-General, Environment acknowledged this was "challenging", but told us the Department had established various initiatives to assist local authorities in reaching their targets.[23] For example, as a result of work on Defra's Waste Strategy, a Waste Implementation Programme team had already been set up, including people "from outside Government, from the private sector and from local authorities", to "engage directly with local authorities, particularly those which are performing less well" in meeting their efficiency saving targets.[24] Similarly, a "programme of direct consultancy aid" had been established by the Department to help local authorities improve their efficiency performance.[25] Defra's Director-General, Environment added that the Department looked "well on track" to meet the efficiency saving figure of £299 million by 2007-08.[26]

13. We recognise the difficulties Defra faces in meeting its efficiency saving targets, as set out in the Gershon Review, given that achievement of almost half the £610 million target relies on the actions of local authorities in relation to waste management. We therefore welcome Defra's recent initiatives, such as the Waste Implementation Programme, to assist local authorities in achieving their individual targets.

14. Nevertheless, Defra still has no power to oblige local authorities to make savings. We therefore remain to be convinced that this third party approach towards achieving the Department's efficiency saving target will actually work. We recommend that the Department publish a report on how it is progressing towards meeting its efficiency targets.

15. We asked about the timetable for achieving the £299 million figure in waste services efficiencies by 2007-08. The cumulative targets for each year are set out in Table 1.

Table 1: Defra's annual targets for waste services efficiencies (cumulative figures)

  
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Efficiency saving target (£m)
52
135
217
299


Defra's Chief Operating Officer said the Department had met its £52 million target for 2004-05.[27] Nevertheless, he agreed with the Chairman's comment that Defra would have to "run harder and harder as the years go by" in order to meet its other targets.[28] The Department was therefore introducing "interventions… around things like [Private Finance Initiative], pilot projects, targeting poor performers, best practice guidance, and so on".[29] He was confident that "all of those things would deliver" savings in waste services of £299 million by 2007-08.[30] Defra's Efficiency Technical Note provides more information on how the Department aims to meet this target.[31] In written evidence, the Department said it had made clear to local authorities that "savings should not be achieved at the cost of front line services".[32] We congratulate Defra for meeting its first year target of £52 million in waste services efficiencies. However, the targets for the next three years are more challenging. We recommend the Department strive to maintain, and expand, its various initiatives to assist local authorities—particularly those authorities performing less well—to ensure it meets its total waste services efficiency target of £299 million by 2007-08.

16. We have noted that the £610 million efficiency savings target includes reductions of 800 staff from the core department and 1,600 from the Rural Payments Agency. We cover the impact of these staff reductions in paragraphs 28-30 below.


11   HC (2002-03) 832, para 7. Back

12   Ev 8, para 43  Back

13   Defra, Departmental Report 2005, table 1, p 277; estimate provided in Defra, Departmental Report 2004, table 1, p 233. Back

14   Ev 5, paras 25 and 29 Back

15   Ev 6, paras 30-32 Back

16   Defra, 2004/05 Resource accounts, HC 445 Back

17   Defra, 2004/05 Resource accounts, HC 445, p 18 Back

18   Ev 40, para 4 Back

19   Sir Peter Gershon, Releasing resources to the front line: Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency, July 2004. Available on the Treasury Internet site at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk Back

20   Defra, Departmental Report 2005, pp 244-246. Back

21   Defra, Departmental Report 2005, p 19 Back

22   Ev 4, paras 15 and 19 Back

23   Q 13 Back

24   Q 13 Back

25   Q 13 Back

26   Q 13 Back

27   Q 24 Back

28   Q 27 Back

29   Q 27 Back

30   Q 27 Back

31   www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/busplan/efficiencynote-0410.pdf Back

32   Ev 44, para 23 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 20 December 2005