Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Devon Community Composting Network

  1. It's difficult for me to respond to this review under the framework that is given—especially given the time frame and the demands on my time.

  2. Evidence is asked for—which I do not have—only years of working with the Agency, primarily in working on Exemptions from waste licensing—risk assessments—for prospective sites and meetings with officials over legislation etc.

  3. The first thing to say is that I think that the job of the Agency is difficult to criticise as they are only policing some extremely badly drafted legislation that we have laboured under for more than a decade now. Talking to grass roots recycling, reuse and composting projects there is enormous frustration with the legislation and red tape process. Projects, who are trying to reduce waste and protect the environment come up against the most ridiculous and often contradictory legislation, Spreading raw manure around is OK (even though it is potentially highly polluting) but stabilising it by composting first and then spreading it requires more legislative control.

  4. Trying to run a "zero waste" reuse centre is fraught with looking at exemptions for every single material brought in and our local officer was bamboozled by what to do with mixed buttons as they could be made of plastic, horn, metal, wood etc—so which exemption did they fit under? We desperately need a low level exemption—or license for these small projects. The Agency don't seem to know what alternatives can be offered to groups.

  5. The second thing to say is that in Devon where I mainly operate I find that the Agency officers have really tried hard to understand and work with our sector. The attitude has changed from viewing us as people that needed curbing and controlling to one where I feel that they are very supportive of our activities and are aghast at the proposed charges for Waste Exemptions.

    —  how successful the Environment Agency has been in its role as enforcer of environmental regulation and controls, and how well it manages its wide range of activities;

    —  whether the Agency operates efficiently and provides good value for money;

  6. I do think it is extraordinary that I am still getting calls from projects that are told that they cannot start their project on a proposed site because the Agency tells them that, "because it is within 250 metres of a sensitive receptor that they cannot proceed." Rather than advising them that, "because they are within 250 metres, that they have to undertake a site specific risk assessment." I have also heard of numerous instances from other parts of the country, sometimes a simple plan of the site will suffice—with other groups a risk assessment undertaken by a third party is needed. As for good value for money—well it's free for exempt projects at the moment—which is how we would like it to remain.

    —  the structure, governance and accountability of the Agency;

  7. The Agency has changed its structure—I have not noticed this having made any great changes from the way we work with them. I thought that the local officer would be seeking advice from other areas when they didn't have the experience, I don't think that that has been happening very efficiently.

    —  its relationships with Defra, Defra-sponsored bodies and the rest of Government, including the Agency's role in the planning system;

  8. I can't really comment on this other than to say that the Agency always tells me to lobby Defra for changes. Do Defra listen effectively to the Agency?

    —  the Agency's relationship with non-Governmental stakeholders and the general public, and how the Agency monitors satisfaction with its services;

  9. See under comments above

    —  the Agency's responsibilities for flood defence and flood mapping, including guidance to the public;

    —  how the organisational changes brought about by the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill will affect the role of the Environment Agency;

    —  how the Agency's work in improving wildlife habitats will tie in with Natural England's work on biodiversity;

    —  the Environment Agency's forthcoming corporate strategy 2006-11.

Devon Community Composting Network

December 2005


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 11 May 2006