Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by WWF (Bio 28)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The power and the transport sector are major contributors to the UK's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. If the UK is to play its part in cutting CO2 emissions in line with keeping the global average temperature below a 2C increase compared with pre-industrial levels—a widely recognised "tipping point"—then a radical shift is needed in the UK and globally. As well as greatly improving our energy efficiency and reducing demand for energy, there must be a switch from polluting to clean fuels, for the UK's heat, electricity and transport needs.

  2.  Modern and carbon-neutral biomass fuels[46] have the potential to become a key source of electricity and heat in the next 20 years.[47] Compared to the intermittent renewable energies, such as wind and solar, biomass fuels offer the advantage that they can be stored and therefore used when needed. This increases the application of biomass fuels as a valuable alternative to replace coal in power plants, especially if domestic micro-generation and CH/CHP schemes are properly supported and built. Also, a reasonable amount (5-10%) of oil in transport fuels could be replaced with bio-fuels too.

  3.  Research shows that there is an opportunity for OECD countries to generate up to 15% of their electricity requirements from sustainable biomass sources by 2020.[48] Therefore, the potential global contribution of bio-energy in 2050 could be substantial, with an input estimated at 50%.[49] Supporting the sustainable production and use of biomass is also important for many communities in developing countries, as many still aren't on conventional electricity grids and so rely on the unsustainable use of firewood, dung and inefficient cookers for heat, which have been linked to significant environmental and health problems.

  4.  However, much more research is required regarding the growing of bio-energy crops in order to ensure vulnerable eco-regions are protected, as they may become at risk from expanding bio-fuel production outside Europe, if robust safeguards and whole life-cycle, worldwide footprint criteria are not applied as standard. The eco-regions at most risk from exploitation are probably those located in low-cost producing countries like Brazil, Zambia and Australia.

  5.  Hence, while increasing bio-energy use can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, if not properly supported, safeguarded and managed it could threaten the conservation of forest, freshwater and coastal ecoregions that are priorities for WWF.

THE ROLE AND SCOPE OF BIO-ENERGY IN CONTRIBUTING TO THE ENERGY MIX

  (i)  When creating an economic level-playing field, biomass fuels are cost-effective and easily accessible sources of energy to replace fossil fuels.

  (ii)  At present preference should be given to the use of energy crops in highly efficient combined heat and power production or in direct heating. These applications offer a greater carbon saving than using this valuable and finite resource to produce electricity alone or for transport fuels. Indeed, processes to produce biofuels for transport are often energy intensive, significantly reducing the net carbon benefits.

  (iii)  Currently, bio-electricity represents about 1% of the electricity production capacity in OECD countries, with an installed capacity of about 18.4GW. Most bioelectricity production in OECD countries is associated with forestry and wood processing industry activities.

  (iv)  Most plants are of the combined heat and power type and are based on a variety of combustion technologies, where the heat produced is generally used for industrial process heat or district heating. Some countries, such as Finland, have considerable experience with co-firing biomass with fossil fuels and waste.

  (v)  Bio-fuels are a rapidly growing industry: exports of ethanol increased by 21% from 1990-2002; Brazil's ethanol exports grew approx. 1000% since 2000, and EU production of biodiesel grew 81% since 2002.

  (vi)  Pressure for a substantial increase in bio-fuel production for transport use is set to increase in light of the current oil price hikes, both in the developed and in the developing world.

  (vii)  While a biomass industry base and a readily available biomass feedstock are strong factors behind the relatively more developed bioelectricity sector in some countries, usually the development of bioelectricity has also been a result of regulations favouring the input of bioelectricity into the electricity grid and policies supporting the price of bioelectricity, or due to taxes on the use of conventional fuels on environmental grounds.

  6.  Therefore, a significant increase in bioelectricity use will require strong policy commitment and needs to be accompanied by regulations and guidelines that ensure its environmental sustainability.

BIO-ENERGY COSTS IN COMPARISON TO OTHER RENEWABLES

  7.  The cost of biomass fuel supply depends on the cost of producing or recovering the biomass feedstock and on the costs incurred during its transport and pre-processing prior to use in electricity generating plants. Biomass feedstock costs vary widely from negative values, in the case of some residues requiring disposal, to relatively high costs in the case of some dedicated energy crops.

  8.  The final cost of bioelectricity depends on; the supply economics of biomass feedstock, the power generation technology, the scale of operation and the extent to which retrofitting is possible in the case of co-firing or parallel-firing with fossil fuel (eg coal). Combined heat and power (CHP or cogeneration) results in a more efficient use of biomass and could contribute significantly to the economic viability of electricity from biomass.

  9.  Current bioelectricity costs from dedicated combustion plants range between €60 and €120/MWh depending on the type of combustion technology used and fuel cost. However, much lower costs could be achieved in co-firing applications, where suitable quantities of biomass can be supplied to existing coal plants.

  10.  The largest potential for cost reduction lies with gasification technologies, in part because of the efficiency gains over combustion plants. Future bioelectricity cost from dedicated plants fuelled with energy crops are likely to be about €50-60/MWh.

  11.  Biomass energy schemes are estimated to generate between 400 and 800 full time equivalent jobs per GW of capacity installed. However, the greatest value of bioelectricity schemes with regard to employment lies in the fact that quality jobs could be generated where there is great need for them, in particular in rural areas.

POSSIBLE MEASURES AND ACTIONS NEEDED TO SUPPORT AN INCREASE IN BIO-ENERGY DEMAND

  (i)  Stimulating bio-energy requires a cross-departmental approach at government level.

  (ii)  Governments have a key role to play in stimulating bio-energy demand through a package of measures including preferential tariffs or quotas for biomass power, capital grants, public procurement, demonstration projects, building regulations and planning regulations.

  (iii)  Whilst calling for an increased use of bioenergy, the EU must also endorse the mandatory eco-certification of all bio-fuels in Europe and potentially heat and power, whether they originate from domestic or imported sources. Thus, WWF believes it is imperative that the EU establishes a legally binding eco-certification scheme for both domestic and imported fuels, as this will help to protect the environment.

  (iv)  The eco-certification must also cover the climate benefits of any potential bio-fuel, as energy intensive production methods may mean some bio-fuels offer any advantage over conventional fuels in terms of overall CO2 emissions reduction.

  (v)  Bio-energy can be developed without conflicting or indeed competing with agriculture and forest (timber, fibre, non-timber forest products) production or nature conservation needs. National and regional governments should establish energy strategies that include local and regional planning guidelines to stimulate the development of biomass generation.

  (vi)  The raw material sources will need to be determined at a regional/landscape/catchment level. These will include existing forest resources, dedicated forests, short rotation coppice, dedicated agricultural crops, and residues from existing forest and agricultural operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

  12.  The impact of increased biomass production on water consumption and on freshwater biodiversity depends on several factors:

  (i)  Crop type: whether it's biomass waste or a specific energy crop.

  (ii)  Land area: whether the crop is replacing an agricultural crop or requiring new land and new water resources.

  (iii)  Water availability and growth methods.

  (iv)  River basin linkage: are there upstream or downstream impacts from the crops on freshwater eco-regions and biodiversity?

  13.  Already millions of hectares of tropical forest have been cleared to make way for the plantations of palm oil, soy and sugar—all major sources for bio-fuels—leading to huge biodiversity losses. As well as polluting soils and waters, the use of pesticides on the crops also threatens biodiversity.

  14.  In considering the environmental impacts of a bio-energy scheme WWF believes that:

  (i)  Site specific best methods of production need to be further developed for all raw material sources, backed up by methodologies ensuring effective implementation and monitoring.

  (ii)  There should be no conversion of natural forest or High Conservation Value (HCV) habitats for energy production. HCVs should be maintained or enhanced.

  (iii)  Production of biomass fuels should not result in net negative impacts on habitats and/or biodiversity, for example over-use of freshwater may need to be monitored and safeguarded against.

  15.  WWF believes a number of key principles are required to ensure that biomass is produced and used effectively for sustainable electricity production, as summarised below:

  (i)  Life Cycle Analysis principles should be applied to bio-electricity chains to ensure that any significant impacts are dealt with and benefits are captured.

  (ii)  Bio-electricity schemes need to be subject to rigorous Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) prior to implementation to address local potential negative impacts and capture value of benefits.

  (iii)  Good agricultural/forestry practices must be followed which have been developed to suit local conditions.

  (iv)  The continuous development and introduction of new varieties and clones that are suited to local soils and climate is necessary to optimise productivity and minimise inputs.

  (v)  Biomass production practices must protect and/or enhance soil organic matter.

  (vi)  The level of freshwater use should be assessed throughout the production and conversion chain with particular emphasis on impacts on watersheds.

  (vii)  Best available conversion technologies (BATs) should be used to minimise emission to air and to other environmental media. Combined heat and power (CHP) systems are preferred.

  (viii)  Ash quality from conversion processes should be monitored and efforts made to recycle ashes back to land.

BIO-ENERGY—WWF IS COMMITTED TO:

  (i)  Promoting bio-energy as a viable alternative, carbon neutral, renewable and environmentally sound source of energy to consumers.

  (ii)  Working with the biomass industry and the progressive parts of the power sector to promote biomass as a replacement for unsustainable, dirty energy production and use.

  (iii)  Working with agriculture and forestry sectors to promote sustainable supplies of biomass.

  (iv)  Calling on the national governments, and intergovernmental organisations and other NGOs to develop biomass strategies and incentives to stimulate biomass supply in power generation.

  (v)  Developing good practice guidelines for bio-energy raw material supplies.

  (vi)  Advocating the development of best practice standards for integrated pollution prevention and control for power generation plants.

WWF

February 2006

REFERENCES

  Bauen et al, 2003, Bio-Power Switch: a blueprint for achieving 15% of electricity from biomass in OECD countries by 2020, Imperial College London and E4tech Consulting, available on www.panda.org/climate.

  UNDP, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Energy Council, 2000, World Energy Assessment.

  WWF-UK's responses to the UK CCP Review (March 2005), the Stern Review (December 2005) and the EAC inquiry "Keeping the Lights on" (September 2005).





46   Biomass refers to all types of fuel, both solid and liquid, from biological materials whereas bio-fuels are liquids such as ethanol (from crops like sugar) or biodiesel (from oil crops like rape seed and oil palm). Back

47   This paper focuses on modern bio-energy uses, eg conversion of biomass in heat, electricity or transport fuels through an industrial process. Back

48   Bauen et al, 2003, Bio-Power Switch: a blueprint for achieving 15% of electricity from biomass in OECD countries by 2020, Imperial College London and E4tech Consulting, available on www.panda.org/climate. Back

49   UNDP, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Energy Council, 2000, World Energy Assessment. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 18 September 2006