Appendix 1: reports on Council meetings
When the House is sitting, we table a written
Question on the day of each meeting of the Council of Ministers
asking for a report on the Council meeting and on the activities
of UK Ministers in it. However, for Council meetings taking place
when the House is in recess we ask Departments to write to us
instead. Replies concerning meetings that have taken place since
7 April 2005 are published below.
Letter from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for Science and Innovation, at the Department of Trade
and Industry (Lord Sainsbury of Turville) to the Chairman of the
Committee
Competitiveness Council, 18 April 2005
I represented the UK at the Competitiveness Council
held in Luxembourg on Monday 18 April. This letter reports on
the outcome of the Council and details the UK position taken on
the agenda items where relevant.
The Council briefly discussed the newly reinvigorated
Lisbon Strategy following the Spring European Council on 22-23
March 2005. The Presidency said that it was important for the
Competitiveness Council to work in partnership with ECOFIN and
the Employment Council to take forward the integrated guidelines
for growth and jobs (2005-2008), published by the Commission on
13 April. The Commission highlighted the importance of the Competitiveness
Council's role in respect of the micro-economic guidelines. The
Competitiveness Council will have a full debate on the integrated
guidelines and next steps at its next meeting on 10 May 2005.
The Commission presented its recent Communication
on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs emphasising the new Commission's
commitment to progressing the better regulation agenda in the
EU as an essential element of achieving Lisbon goals. In particular,
the Commission highlighted its planned action to improve impact
assessment procedures; renew efforts on simplification of existing
legislation; and screen proposals that had been tabled before
January 2004 with a view to withdrawing or modifying those that
were no longer in line with the Commissions' new better regulation
principles. The Commission also highlighted the need for Member
States to fulfil better regulation aims domestically and outlined
its proposal to establish a group of national experts to share
best practice.
The Council had a substantive exchange of views during
which Ministers broadly welcomed the Communication and agreed
the need to deliver on this agenda. A number of Member States
highlighted new better regulation initiatives at national level,
some raised the importance of respecting the Community acquis
and the respective roles of the institutions in legislative processes,
and others stressed the need to take all three pillars (social,
environmental and economic) into account in impact assessment
procedures.
I strongly welcomed the Communication and its focus
on jobs and growth, in particular the Commission's intention to
redouble its efforts on simplification. I said the UK looked forward
to working with the Commission during our Presidency to help build
a robust competitiveness-based simplification programme for 2006
and beyond. I welcomed the intention to screen proposals tabled
before January 2004 with a view to withdrawing or modifying those
that were no longer relevant or needed. I highlighted the need
for the Commission to take forward the 15 simplification priorities
agreed on by the Competitiveness Council last November and stressed
the UK's commitment to progressing these rapidly when the proposals
reach Council.
The Commission presented its Communication of 6 April
2005 proposing a Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP)
for 2007 — 2013. This brings together a number of existing
programmes in a single strategy and proposes new actions to support
SMEs. There was no debate. The Competitiveness Council will have
its first exchange of views on the CIP at its next meeting on
10 May.
The Council had a brief exchange of views and agreed
conclusions on the importance of tourism to the European economy
and of developing the tourism industry in a sustainable way. The
UK did not intervene.
The Commission presented its proposal for the Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7) — the EU's chief instrument for
funding research, technology and innovation for 2007-2013. Its
importance in achieving Lisbon goals and the proposed doubling
of the Framework Programme budget were highlighted. New elements
were outlined, including proposals for support though new infrastructures,
the introduction of Joint Technology Initiatives and better co-ordination
of programmes, and proposals presented to simplify administrative
and financial procedures.
In the Council's first exchange of views on the FP7
proposal, Member States broadly welcomed the Commission's Communication
as a good basis for discussion. I expressed the UK's view that
the proposed new structure gives a greater focus to the objectives
of European research funding and welcomed the emphasis on simplifying
the programme, which the UK hoped would help increase business
participation. I stressed the need for funding to be allocated
on a competitive basis in a way that provides maximum added value
and expressed our support for establishing a European Research
Council to oversee the funding of basic research. The Council
will return to the FP7 proposal at its meeting in June.
The Council received an update from the Commission
on developments in international negotiations on the International
Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Ministers welcomed
the progress made and agreed the need to work towards achieving
the timetable set out at the European Council meeting of 22-23
March 2005 of finalising an international agreement on ITER by
July 2005. The Council reaffirmed its support for a six party
ITER, the UK's preferred option.
The Council agreed conclusions on the need for effective
human resources policy in Research and Development and its importance
in achieving Lisbon goals. I did not intervene.
You may also wish to note that further to the update
on EM 10904/03 provided by Gerry Sutcliffe at the end of March,
the Council formally adopted the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
with the incorporation of the European Parliament's second reading
amendments as an A point and without discussion. As outlined in
Gerry Sutcliffe's letter, this was originally envisaged for the
6/7 June Competitiveness Council, but was brought forward by the
Luxembourg Presidency.
29 April 2005
Letter from the Divisional Manager, Europe Division,
at the Department for Transport (John Stevens CBE) to the Clerk
of the Committee
Outcome of The EU Transport Council, 21 April
2005
A transport session of the Transport, Telecommunications
and Energy Council met in Luxembourg on 21 April. The Minister
of State, Tony McNulty, represented the UK.
The Council reached political agreement on the proposal
to amend the extant directive on charging of heavy goods vehicles
for the use of certain infrastructure (Eurovignette), on the basis
of a Presidency compromise text, which the UK was able to accept.
Most other Member States could also accept it with varying degrees
of reluctance, but a small number remained opposed. However the
political agreement was reached with a substantial qualified majority
in favour.
The Council considered two of the proposals constituting
the Commission's Third Rail Package. It noted a report which identified
almost no support amongst Member States for the proposal for a
Regulation on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual
quality requirements for rail freight services. The UK has been
among Member States arguing that this proposal should not progress
further.
Member States responded to a Presidency questionnaire
on the proposed Regulation on International Rail Passengers' Rights
and Obligations. The Presidency concluded that the best basis
for progress would be a basic Regulation that did not go against
the provisions of COTIF (the existing inter-governmental convention
on International Carriage by Rail to which most EC Member States
are signatory), but which might include some additional provisions,
especially for passengers with reduced mobility. The UK was among
Member States which were able to support in principle this proposal
for enhanced rights.
The Council reached a partial general approach on
a draft regulation establishing the second Marco Polo programme,
intended to fund projects for improving the environmental performance
of freight transport by shifting a significant proportion from
road to other modes. The programme is subject to a budget to be
agreed as part of the overall negotiations on the Financial Perspectives.
A Council minutes statement made clear that the budget did not
form part of the partial General Approach and that it would be
possible to return to other elements, especially the overall quantitative
objective, at a later stage. The UK was able to accept the text.
In a progress report on EU-US aviation relations,
Commissioner Barrot reported on his recent visit to Washington.
The visit had renewed contacts, and US Transportation Secretary
Mineta seemed open to reaching a solution. The Commission said
that it would pursue negotiations with the US using the June 2004
draft agreement as a starting point. There would be a stock-take
at the next Transport Council in June. The UK welcomed the proposed
stock-take and undertook to do all it could to help move the process
forward so as to achieve a balanced first stage agreement. The
UK objective throughout has been to achieve a balanced deal which
is good for users and the European industry.
Also planned for the June Council are Conclusions
on developing the wider external aviation agenda. The Commission
saw the priorities as expansion of the Community regulatory environment
into neighbouring countries and agreements with major trade partners
such as India and China. The focus with EU neighbours would be
to increase regulatory convergence on safety, security and competition
as a pre-condition to a sustainable market.
The Council reached a General Approach on a Regulation
ensuring greater transparency to passengers about the air carrier
operating the flight on which they have booked, and dissemination
of information about airlines judged unsafe by Member States.
The UK was able to accept the text.
The Commission presented its proposal to ensure non-discrimination
and assistance for persons of reduced mobility travelling by air.
The UK has welcomed this proposal from the Commission.
Under Other Business, the Commission made a statement
on relations with the International Maritime Organization (IMO),
arguing that it was in the mutual interest of the Community and
IMO to work well together, and that the Council should look again
at the issue of Community membership of IMO, which has not received
general support from Member States
The Commission also stated that it would be seeking
a mandate for negotiations within the International Labour Organisation
(ILO) on the consolidation of existing conventions on maritime
employment. The Commission would be aiming to safeguard existing
EC legislation.
27 April 2005
Letter from the Departmental Scrutiny Co-ordinator,
at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (James Eke) to the Clerk
of the Committee
Outcome of the 25 April 2005 General Affairs and
External Relations Council
John Grant (UK's Permanent Representative to the
EU) represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations
Council (GAERC) in Luxembourg on 25 April.
Conclusions were agreed on Iraq, Middle East Peace
Process, Serbia & Montenegro, The former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia, Kosovo, Great Lakes, Togo and the European Neighbourhood
Policy (ENP).
GENERAL AFFAIRS SESSION
Financial Frameworks 2007-13
The Council exchanged views on a revised version
of the Presidency's "negotiating box" (a draft framework
for June European Council Conclusions). The discussion concentrated
on cohesion policy, specifically the overall size of the Structural
and Cohesion Funds, and the distribution of funds within them.
The Presidency aims to reach a political agreement at the June
European Council. The Government's position on future financing
remains that the Commission's proposals for real terms spending
increases of 35% from 2007 to 2013 are unrealistic and unacceptable.
We, along with France, Germany, The Netherlands, Austria and Sweden,
believe that the priorities of an enlarged Union can be met within
a budget of 1% EU Gross National Income (GNI). Within a 1% package,
we have argued that cohesion policy should be focused on the poorest
Member States.
EXTERNAL RELATIONS SESSION
Tsunami Follow-up
The Council took note of a presentation by the Commission
on two communications and a report from High Representative Solana
on the follow-up to the Action Plan agreed by the Council in January
2005 to aid the areas affected by the December 2004 earthquake
and tsunami. The Council requested COREPER to prepare discussions
for the 23/24 May GAERC. The Government welcomed the Council Secretariat
and Commission papers and looks forward to discussing how we can
take this forward with Partners at the May GAERC and into the
UK Presidency of the EU.
MIDDLE EAST
The Presidency outlined plans to host an international
conference on Iraq with the US. The Presidency made clear that
Iraqi needs and wishes must be to the forefront of any such conference.
Close cooperation with Iraq on the conference is, therefore,
essential. The conference will present an opportunity for the
Iraqi authorities to inform the EU on their strategy for the country
over the medium and long term, including their ideas on the constitutional
process and the political, economic and social reconstruction
of Iraq. This will not be a donors conference, but will focus
on the three pillars of UN Security Council Resolution 1546 (political,
security, reconstruction/economy). The Government welcomed the
plans for an International Conference. It is a chance for the
international community to support Iraq as it seeks to complete
the transitional process. The Government believes the Conference
should happen as early as possible in order to maintain Iraqi
momentum on drafting the constitution and on preparing for the
referendum and further elections.
On Lebanon the Council welcomed the continuing withdrawal
of all Syrian troops and reiterated the importance of full implementation
of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1559. The Council also
welcomed the appointment of Prime Minister, Najib Mikati, and
the formation of a new Lebanese Cabinet. Ministers expressed the
importance of free and fair Lebanese Parliamentary elections,
that are held on time, and are free from foreign interference.
The Commission reiterated its offer to send an electoral observation
mission if requested by the Lebanese government. The Government
is pleased that Prime Minister Mikati has formed a government
and is committed to holding credible elections by the end of May.
We also welcome the Commissions recommendation of an EU Election
Observer Mission.
The Council also discussed the Middle East Peace
Process. High Representative Solana emphasised that international
community support to disengagement continues to be crucial. Ministers
called on the Israelis and Palestinians to urgently renew efforts
to honour the commitments to which they subscribed in Sharm el
Sheikh, and to avoid any action that might shake the climate of
mutual confidence. Ministers hoped that this message would be
reiterated by the 'Quartet' (EU/UN/US/Russia) at their meeting
on 8 May. Finally, the Presidency informed Partners that the
current President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, has been
appointed 'Quartet' representative to support the withdrawal process
from Gaza.
WESTERN BALKANS
Ministers discussed Serbia and Montenegro and asked
the Commission to start negotiating a Stabilisation and Association
Agreement (SAA). This comes after the significant progress made
by Belgrade in co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal
for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The Commission will present
a negotiating mandate shortly, which should pave the way for discussions
to commence in October, provided that there is further improvement
in co-operation with the ICTY, especially in relation to Ratko
Mladic and Radovan Karadzic. Ministers expressed encouragement
at recent developments in Kosovo, particularly the constructive
attitude shown by Belgrade and exclusion of any idea to partition
Kosovo. The GAERC subsequently agreed Conclusions on the opening
of SAA negotiations with Serbia and Montenegro, the Commission's
recent communication on Kosovo, the conduct of the elections in
Macedonia, and the Macedonia name issue. The Government welcomed
the progress made by Belgrade in sending ICTY indictees to The
Hague and the recommendation by the Commission to open SAA negotiations.
The Government also welcomed the Commission's communication on
Kosovo and their increased commitment to Kosovo and its economic
development.
RUSSIA
The Presidency, High Representative Solana and the
Commission updated the Council on preparations for the EU/Russia
Summit in Moscow on 10 May. Member States invited the Presidency
and the Commission to finalise the preparations for the Summit.
A key objective of the Summit is to agree the Four Common Spaces
agreement, which provides a framework for EU-Russia cooperation
through a common economic space; a common space of freedom, justice
and security; a common space of external security; and a common
space of research and education, including culture. The Government
welcomed progress made so far and supported the Presidency in
their efforts to reach an agreement on the Spaces before the Summit.
ZIMBABWE
The Presidency recalled the 5 April EU declaration
on the Zimbabwe elections and noted that many African countries
had publicly declared the Zimbabwe elections free and fair. He
drew attention to the Africans' request, at the EU/Africa Ministerial
on 11 April, for an EU-Africa Summit and a solution to the problem
of Zimbabwe attendance. The Presidency said the GAERC would discuss
Zimbabwe further in May. The Government continues to believe
that Zimbabwe has little respect for human rights, has selective
justice and continues to pursue bad policies that have been disastrous
for Zimbabweans. The elections did not go well. The Government
looks forward to the May review on EU Policy towards Zimbabwe.
GREAT LAKES
High Representative Solana informed Member States
that he will be travelling to the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(DRC) with Louis Michel (Development Commissioner) on 28-30 April
for talks with President Kabila. Talks will focus on the referendum
on the constitution and the general elections, and express concerns
about the security situation. Reintegration of the army is essential
to ensure political transition and peace. High Representative
Solana urged Member States to support the transition process.
The Government supported this assessment. The current peace
process is the only way forward. The Council agreed Conclusions
that underlined the importance of the electoral process and army
integration in the DRC; and noted progress in Rwanda and Burundi.
SUDAN
The Council had an exchange of views on the situation
in Sudan in light of the adoption of UN Security Council Resolutions
1590, 1591 and 1593. Member States reiterated their concern concerning
the situation in Darfur. They invited the relevant actors to
respect the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and to seek a peaceful
solution to the conflict. The Council also confirmed its desire
to continue to support the efforts of the African Union by providing
assistance to a reinforced AU mission in Darfur. The Government
supported the UN Security Council Resolutions recently adopted
and agrees with the need for their swift and effective implementation.
It also supports the EU's confirmation of support to the African
Union and with any assistance it may be able to provide.
3 May 2005
Letter from the EU Co-ordination and Strategy
Team, at HM Treasury (Stewart James) to the Clerk of the Committee
ECOFIN Council, 12 April 2005
You will be aware that during the pre-election period
EU business has continued as normal including a scheduled meeting
of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN). I have
set out the outcome of the meeting below.
The Council received a presentation by the Commission
on its Recommendation on the 'Broad Economic Guidelines for the
economic policies of Member States and the Community'. The Commission's
recommendations will form the basis for ECOFIN's formulation of
new Broad Economic Policy Guidelines and for the Employment Council's
formulation of new Employment Guidelines to cover the period 2005-2008.
The Council welcomed the commitment of the Greek
government to bring its deficit below 3% of GDP in 2006. The Council
also welcomed the continued efforts of the Greek authorities,
in close collaboration with Eurostat, to address remaining statistical
issues. The Council considered that the decisions taken by the
Greek government are in line with the Council recommendations
of 17 February in accordance with Article 104(9). There would
be a further report by the Greek authorities and associated Commission
assessment of the Greek fiscal situation by 31 October.
The Council took note of a presentation by the Commission
on the principal results of the fiscal notifications for Member
States for 2004.
Reporting on its Communication on administrative
burdens on business the Commission outlined the areas where pilot
projects will be set up to measure this administrative burden,
confirming that the results of these pilot projects will be available
in early Autumn 2005. The UK welcomed the political commitment
shown by the Commission in its Communication and noted the importance
of improving the regulatory environment as part of the Lisbon
agenda.
The Presidency presented to the Council the negotiating
box for the financial perspectives for the period 2007-2013. There
was an exchange of views. The UK reiterated the need for expenditure
reform and its view that the rebate remains fully justified and
is not up for negotiation.
There was an exchange of views on the funding of
development aid. The UK's proposed International Finance Facility
and French and German proposals for international taxes for development
emerged as possible issues for further consideration. The issue
will be discussed in more detail at an informal meeting of the
ECOFIN Council.
There was a discussion of two key aspects of the
Savings Directive: progress towards implementation on 1 July;
and remaining questions of the interpretation of the directive
with regard to accrued interest and investment via funds of funds.
The Commission confirmed that good progress was being made towards
implementation. Agreement was reached on common interpretation
which will apply equally to Member States, third countries and
dependent and associated territories.
The Council agreed Conclusions calling upon the Commission
to present proposals to increase minimum rates of excise duty
on alcoholic beverages in line with inflation, and to modernise
the system of classification of alcoholic beverages.
I look forward to working with the newly constituted
EU Scrutiny committees in due course.
5 May 2005
Letter from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for Science and Innovation, at the Department of Trade
and Industry (Lord Sainsbury of Turville) to the Chairman of the
Committee
Competitiveness Council, 10 May 2005
I represented the UK at the Competitiveness Council
held in Brussels on Tuesday 10 May. This letter reports on the
outcome, detailing the UK position where relevant.
The Council had a comprehensive exchange of views
on the microeconomic aspects of the Lisbon integrated guidelines
for. growth and jobs (2005-2008), and on whether they were adequate
to take forward National Reform Programmes (NRPs). The integrated
guidelines incorporate the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs)
and the Employment Guidelines (EGs) which are to be considered
by ECOFIN and EPSCO Councils respectively, before they are forwarded
to the European Council on 16-17 June.
I intervened to say that the Competitiveness Council's
key role was to deliver real progress on the Council's agenda
of microeconomic reform — better regulation, completion
of the internal market, innovation and research — while
providing for exchange of best practice and benchmarking progress
on microeconomic reforms.
At the end of the debate, the Presidency adopted
conclusions noting that the Council welcomed the Commission's
recommendations on the microeconomic elements of the integrated
guidelines. The Council stressed the importance of a flexible
approach to enable Member States to tailor NRPs to national situations.
The Council also stressed the need for coordination (at national
and Community level) and for coherence between the macroeconomic
and microeconomic elements and the employment guidelines.
Facilitating innovation; investing in R&D; contributing
to a strong industrial base (with a new horizontal and sectoral
approach — for both cuffing-edge technologies and traditional
sectors); and completing the internal market — a big priority
for job creation and to meet the challenges of globalisation —
were identified as priority actions.
The Council recognised that a weakness of the first
phase of the Lisbon Strategy was the lack of national action.
The Council agreed to rapidly put in place NRPs. The expectation
is for NRPs to be presented in the autumn of 2005, after consultation
with national Parliaments and social partners. The Council will
review the published NRPs and consider any necessary adjustments
in collaboration with ECOFIN. The Presidency will inform ECOFIN
of the Competitiveness Council discussions and asked the High
Level Group on Competitiveness and Growth, COREPER and the Economic
and Policy Committee (EPC) to pursue technical level work on the
NRPs.
The Council had an exchange of views on the Commission's
proposal for a Framework Programme for Competitiveness and Innovation
(2007-2013) (CIP) which brings together a number of existing activities
under three sub-programmes with new actions. The three specific
sub-programmes are: entrepreneurship and innovation (integrating
the existing MAP programme and elements of the LIFE programme);
ICT (incorporating the e-TEN, Modinis, e-Content programmes as
well as the new i2010 European Information Society Strategy due
to be announced in May 2005); and Intelligent Energy Europe (a
programme for the development of environmental technologies, particularly
in the energy and transport sectors). The Commission proposes
a budget of 4 billion Euros for the period 2007-13. The Presidency
asked COREPER to continue to work on the detail of the proposal
in advance of the next meeting of the Council. The UK did not
intervene.
The Council took note of information from the Commission
on the situation in the textile sector — regarding the two-month
safeguard investigations opened against 9 sectors of textiles
and clothing imports from China. The UK did not intervene.
The Council also took note of information from the
Commission covering the developments in negotiations with Japan
on the project site for the International Thermonuclear Experimental
Reactor (ITER). There was no debate.
23 May 2005
Letter from the Minister of State for Lifelong
Learning, Further and Higher Education, at the Department for
Education and Skills (Bill Rammell MP) to the Chairman of the
Committee
EU Education Youth and Culture Council —
23/24 May 2005
I wrote to you on 6 May regarding the agenda for
the Education and Youth Council on 24 May. This letter provides
a report of that meeting and also of the full Education, Youth
and Culture Council. I represented the UK during the Education
section of the Council, Peter Peacock, Scottish Minister for Education
and Young People, represented the UK during the Youth section
and Tessa Jowell, Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport,
represented the UK during the Culture and Audiovisual Council
on the afternoon of 23 May.
I also participated in a meeting of the extended
troika, the Commission and the EU level social partners hosted
by the Presidency the evening before the Education and Youth Council
to prepare the Education Council and which discussed the issues
on the agenda for that part of the Council.
EDUCATION:
The Education session took place in the morning of
24 May and was chaired by Mady Delvaux-Stehres, Luxembourg Minister
for Education and Training. There was an exchange of views on
the Lisbon Guidelines for Growth and Employment during which we
discussed the role of education and training in the revised Lisbon
strategy. The general view was that the "Education and Training
2010" Open Method of Co-ordination should be continued in
parallel to reporting on the guidelines as it addressed active
citizenship and social inclusion and not just jobs and growth.
I welcomed Lisbon's focus on jobs and growth and stressed that
sectoral skills development and investment in education were key
to reinvigorating Lisbon.
We also adopted Council Conclusions on new indicators
in education and training which called for the development of
new indicators which would better measure progress towards the
Lisbon goals.
Mme Delvaux-Stehres presented the conclusions of
the Luxembourg Presidency conference on plurilinguilism, which
looked at the benefits and challenges of teaching through the
medium of a foreign language.
Under any other business, Commissioner Figel presented
the Commission's recent Communication on universities. This focussed
on improving the attractiveness of Europe's universities, improving
governance and increasing governance and increasing funding levels.
I thanked Mme Delvaux-Stehres on behalf of the Council
for the progress made under her Presidency and gave a short presentation
on education plans for the UK presidency.
YOUTH:
The Youth session took place in the afternoon where
Ministers discussed the role of youth policy in the revised Lisbon
strategy. They welcomed the inclusion of the Youth Pact in Lisbon
and said that Youth Ministers should play an active role in developing
and implementing the Lisbon National Reform Programmes to make
sure they addressed the needs of young people. Ministers agreed
that young people should be consulted on the development of the
Lisbon National Reform Programmes and several explained that they
had already set up events to discuss the Youth Pact with young
people. They also emphasised that the Youth Open Method of Co-ordination
should be continued separately from Lisbon, as it covers a wider
range of issues affecting young people.
In addition Ministers adopted Resolutions on the
Youth Open Method of Coordination, which advised Member States
on good practice on participation and providing information to
young people.
Peter Peacock thanked the Luxembourg Presidency for
their work and presented plans for the UK Presidency.
AUDIOVISUAL:
Ministers agreed a partial general approach on the
MEDIA 2007 programme, agreeing the text without specifying a budget
due to the ongoing negotiations on the next financial perspective.
The European Parliament's first reading is due in the autumn.
Ministers discussed recent difficulties in banning
two television channels originating in the Middle East whose broadcasts
were of racist and anti-Semitic content. Some Member States believed
that the banning process had been made more difficult due to the
current rules in the Television without Frontiers (TVWF) Directive.
It was requested that these rules should be changed when the review
of the Directive takes place. The Commission agreed that this
should be part of the review.
Under Any Other Business, thirteen Member States
requested further discussion of the country of origin principle
before the forthcoming review of the TVWF Directive. While Commissioner
Reding assured them that such discussion would take place, in
particular at the forthcoming broadcasting conferences, this would
need to be balanced against protecting the clear legal framework
of the current Directive.
CULTURE:
The two Presidencies for 2005 nominated the Council
representatives for the selection panel who will consider the
nominations for the Capitals of Culture for 2010, Germany and
Hungary. For the UK this was Sir Jeremy lsaacs and for Luxembourg
it was Claude Frisoni.
Ronald de Leeuw, Director General of the Rijksmuseum,
Amsterdam, presented a summary of his expert group's report "Lending
to Europe" which was recently published. The report promotes
the increased mobility of collections within an enlarged EU and
highlights the concerns of leading practitioners regarding key
barriers to mobility, and soaring increases in insurance costs
in particular. Issues raised in the subsequent exchange of views
by other Member States included calls for further studies into
immunity from seizure and promoting exchanges of best practice.
The UK then raised the issues of: indemnities, building up trust
between museums and enlarging the "club" of museums
which share works, as the main priorities that the UK Presidency
would aim to progress. The UK circulated a Written Statement outlining
its views in more detail.
Commissioner Figel introduced the new Citizens for
Europe proposal on active European citizenship, which the Commission
proposes for the 2007-2013 period. There was widespread support
for the aims of the proposed programme: to promote civic participation
and cooperation between Member States' communities. Issues raised
by Member States included the need for a tighter focus to ensure
EU added value. The UK circulated a Written Statement and highlighted
the need to ensure that the proposal took into account the cultural
diversity within Member States so that the programme would not
discriminate against citizens from non-European backgrounds. In
addition, the UK restated its view that the programme should be
consistent with a 1% of EU Gross National Income budget.
Under Any Other Business, the Presidency updated
the Council on the progress of the UNESCO Cultural Diversity Convention
negotiations. A few Member States asked for support for their
proposal to widen the memorials strand of the Culture 2007 programme
to provide funding for memorials relating to the Stalinist era.
Finally, the UK thanked the Luxembourg Presidency and set out
its culture and audiovisual priorities for the UK Presidency.
7 June 2005
Letter from the Departmental Scrutiny Co-ordinator,
at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (James Eke) to the Clerk
of the Committee
Outcome of the 23/24 May 2005 General Affairs
and External Relations Council
My Right Honourable Friends the Foreign Secretary,
the Defence Secretary and the International Development Secretary,
and I represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations
Council (GAERC) in Brussels on 23/24 May.
Conclusions were agreed on ESDP, Uzbekistan, and
Sudan.
GENERAL AFFAIRS SESSION
Financial Frameworks 2007-13 (held in Conclave
on 22 May)
The Council exchanged views on a revised version
of the Presidency's "negotiating box" (a draft framework
for June European Council Conclusions). The discussion covered
both expenditure and own resources. The Presidency aims to reach
a political agreement at the June European Council. The Government's
position on future financing remains that the Commission's proposals
for real terms spending increases of 35% from 2007 to 2013 are
unrealistic and unacceptable. We, along with France, Germany,
The Netherlands, Austria and Sweden, believe that the priorities
of an enlarged Union can be met within a budget of 1% EU Gross
National Income (GNI). The Foreign Secretary also argued that
the UK abatement remained justified and necessary, because of
the inequities on the expenditure side of the EU budget.
PREPARATION FOR THE JUNE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
The Council examined a draft agenda prepared by the
Presidency for the 16/17 June European Council. The agenda includes
Financial Perspectives, Sustainable Development, Justice and Home
Affairs, Enlargement, and External Relations. The Council agreed
that they would discuss the preparations in more detail at the
13/14 June GAERC.
EXTERNAL RELATIONS SESSION
ESDP (Defence Ministers)
The Presidency updated the Council on progress of
capability development towards the Headline Goal 2010. Ministers
noted that the initial version of the Requirements Catalogue 05
was now ready to be subjected to operational analysis, with the
final version to be delivered during the UK Presidency. The Presidency
also welcomed the result of the battlegroup co-ordination conference
in May. To date only one battlegroup slot, one of two in the second
half of 2007, remains unfilled for the 2005-2008 period. The Council
also received a progress report on the European Defence Agency.
BARCELONA PROCESS
The Presidency updated the Council on planning for
the 30-31 May EuroMed Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Luxembourg.
The Presidency hopes to agree joint Ministerial conclusions with
Euromed partners to set out the future direction of the EuroMed
Partnership. The Commission thanked the Presidency for basing
the EU guidelines for the Ministerial on the Commission's recent
EuroMed Communication and welcomed the inclusion of language on
human rights and democracy. The Commission said it would work
closely with the UK and Spain in the run up to the November's
EuroMed Tenth Anniversary Event. The Government continues to believe
that the Barcelona Process Review and November's UK-Spain EuroMed
Tenth Anniversary event are unique opportunities to revitalise
the EuroMed Partnership.
UZBEKISTAN
The Council expressed deep regret at the Uzbek authorities'
failure to respond adequately to the UN's call for an independent
international enquiry, and urged them to reconsider their position.
Officials were tasked to work up a list of options in the event
that the Uzbek government continues to refuse to co-operate. The
Council agreed conclusions: condemning the reported excessive,
disproportionate and indiscriminate use of force by the Uzbek
Security Forces, regretting the failure so far of the Uzbek authorities
to respond adequately to the UN's call for an independent international
enquiry, and urging them to reconsider their position. The conclusions
recalled the commitments and existing mechanisms in the EU-Uzbekistan
Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and the OSCE, and stated
that depending on the response of the Uzbek government the Council
would consider further steps. The Government agreed with the EU
approach.
MIDDLE EAST
Over lunch Ministers discussed the Middle East peace
process (MEPP), Iran, and Iraq. On MEPP, the Council agreed that
the situation remains fragile with the reappearance of tensions
in Gaza (including rocket attacks by Palestinian militants) and
at the Israeli-Lebanese border. In this context, Ministers hoped
that all sides would show restraint. Ministers also discussed
the meeting of the Quartet, which was held in Moscow on May 9,
and the mission of Mr Wolfensohn, the Quartet Special Envoy for
disengagement.
On Iran, Ministers discussed the latest developments
on Iran's nuclear programme. They were updated on the state of
play in negotiations between Iran and France, Germany and the
UK (the 'E3'), supported by High Representative Solana. The Council
confirmed its support for the E3 in their ongoing negotiations,
and reaffirmed the need for Iran to respect all the commitments
made last November under the Paris Agreement.
On Iraq, the Council discussed the preparations for
the International Conference. The Presidency informed Ministers
that the Conference will take place at the end of June in Brussels,
at Foreign Minister level. The Conference will be the occasion
for the Iraqi Interim Government to announce its long-term strategy,
priorities and ideas in the fields of constitutional process,
rebuilding and the rule of law, and to present progress made in
these areas. The Foreign Secretary welcomed the work the Presidency
and others had done to prepare the Conference.
BURUNDI
The Council agreed conclusions welcoming progress
in the peace process, but stressed that there should be no impunity
for those who had committed serious crimes. The Government supports
the peace process in Burundi and believes this peace deal is an
important step that can bring peace and stability.
SUDAN
The Council in both Foreign and Defence Ministers'
formation stressed that the EU will continue its engagement for
the return to peace in Sudan. Ministers reiterated their concern
regarding the continuation of violence in Darfur, and encouraged
all involved parts to engage fully in finding an end to the conflict.
Ministers also tackled the question of EU support to the AMIS
mission (African Union Mission in Sudan), so that the EU can present
an offer of tangible support at the 26 May UN donors conference
in Addis Ababa. The Council tasked the relevant Working Groups
to begin the work on the various area of support, in particular,
logistics, equipment, strategic and tactical air transport, and
the reinforcement of AU observer capacities. The Government welcomes
a clear message of support from the EU to the AU and believes
that the EU needs to concentrate on the areas where it can add
value. The AU must remain in the lead. Any EU offer should recognise
importance of further indications of AU requirements, expert military
assessments and need to factor in other international actors'
contributions, in particular NATO and the UN.
TSUNAMI ACTION PLAN FOLLOW-UP
The Presidency introduced its update on progress
on the Tsunami Action Plan agreed by the 31 January GAERC. Work
was still ongoing in some of the more complex areas (the EU's
disaster response mechanisms). The Development Secretary welcomed
the Presidency's paper and made three observations: (i) the figure
for UK reconstruction assistance was up to £65 million; (ii)
EU citizens had high expectations on consular response and; (iii)
the EU needed to reflect carefully on the lessons learned from
the Tsunami. Work was needed to improve capacities to deliver
aid in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. This not only meant
aircraft and helicopters but also air traffic control capacity.
The Presidency concluded that the paper showed substantial progress
in a number of areas. This task would fall to the incoming Presidency.
An updated Action Plan was agreed.
AOB — GUINEA BISSAU
Portugal, Spain and the Commission expressed concern
about the risk of instability in the run-up to the June elections.
The Presidency agreed the EU would send a firm message on the
need for free and fair elections. An EU Declaration had been sent
on 20 May outlining this message. The Government expresses its
solidarity with Portuguese efforts to stabilise Guinea-Bissau
by promoting peaceful and credible elections through the UN Office
in Guinea-Bissau (UNOGBIS) and Annan's Special Envoy.
DEVELOPMENT AGENDA (24 MAY)
MDG Package of Communications (including EU
ODA/GNI targets)
Development Ministers agreed conclusions relating
to Financing for Development, Policy Coherence for Development
and the EU's Contribution to meeting the MDGs. This was in response
to a package of EC Communications presented last month ahead of
September's Millennium Review Summit.
The Conclusions included historic commitments to
the following ODA/GNI targets:
· a
new average EU target of 0.56% ODA/GNI by 2010;
· commitment
by the 15 member states who joined before 2004 to undertake to
reach at least 0.5 1% by 2010 and 0.7 % by 2015;
· commitment
by the 10 member states who joined in 2004 to strive to reach
0.17% by 2010 and 0.33% by 2015; and
· commitment
that at least 50% of new aid would go to Africa.
The UK strongly welcomes the agreement as it means
that EU aid will almost double between 2004 and 2010, generating
around an additional $40bn (£20.7 bn/€30.6bn) in 2010.
The EC calculate that this represents an additional $25bn (£14
bn/€20 bn) of new aid in 2010 compared to existing EU commitments
for 2006. On current trends this will mean an extra $17bn (£9.7bn/€13.
7bn) for sub-Saharan Africa in 2010 compared to 2004. This represents
67% of the amount required to double aid to sub-Saharan Africa
by 2010 as recommended by the Commission for Africa. The agreement
consolidates the 10 new Member States' shift to donor status.
Ministers also agreed to continue work on multilateral debt and
innovative financing prior to the Millennium Review Summit and
to adopt a comprehensive and long-term EU Strategy for Africa
by December 2005.
REVISION OF EC DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENT (DPS)
EU Development Commissioner Louis Michel outlined
the main objectives for the revision of the DPS that governs EC
aid: centrality of poverty reduction, applicability in all developing
countries, a broadening of scope to suit the full range of countries.
The Commissioner also proposed a set of common principles and
objectives to guide all EU (EC and Member State) aid. The UK pressed
for the DPS to have poverty reduction as its primary objective;
to focus on low-income countries; to define EC added value and
for it to be applied to all developing countries. The Commission
proposal will issue mid-July, with the aim of endorsement by the
Council and European Parliament in November.
EUROPEAN PROGRAMME FOR ACTION ON HIV/AIDS, MALARIA
AND TB THROUGH EXTERNAL ACTION (2007-2011)
Commissioner Michel presented the Programme for Action
and pledged to work closely with the UK Presidency to prepare
for the September Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (GFATM)
replenishment conference. Following a brief discussion, the draft
conclusions were agreed with minor changes to meet the concerns
of Malta (abortion) and Sweden and Denmark (sexual and reproductive
health rights). The UK welcomes the new Programme for Action.
27 May 2005
Letter from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State, at the Department for Work and Pensions (James Plaskitt
MP) to the Chairman of the Committee
Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer
Affairs (ESPHCA) Council, 2 June 2005 Luxembourg
Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry,
accompanied by Gerry Sutcliffe, Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for Employment Relations and Consumer Affairs, represented
the UK at the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs
Council in Luxembourg on 2 June 2005.
The Council agreed a general approach on the Employment
Guidelines, which now form part of the Integrated Guidelines Package
under the revised Lisbon process. The UK maintained its parliamentary
reserve.
On the Directive to implement the social partners
agreement on cross border railway workers, the Council reached
political agreement by qualified majority. The UK maintained its
Parliamentary Scrutiny Reserve. The UK also entered a statement
in the minutes. The UK abstained from the formal vote on this
item.
The Council reached political agreement on amending
regulations for the Bilbao Agency for Safety and Health at Work
and the Dublin Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working
Conditions.
There were extensive discussions in restricted session
on Working Time but no agreement was reached. The Luxembourg Presidency
returned the dossier to Committee of Permanent Representatives
(COREPER). Commissioners Frattini and Spidla jointly opened the
discussion on managing economic migration. The Commission's aim
was to launch a broad debate on this important subject; immigration
levels were clearly for Member States to determine, but it was
undeniable that migration was economically essential, and that
for the economic benefits to be fully realised, integration of
migrants into society and labour markets must be addressed. There
will be further discussions on this subject at a Commission seminar
on 14 June.
On the Regulation establishing a European Institute
for Gender Equality the Council agreed a general approach. The
Council unanimously opposed the Commission's proposal for reduced
management structures in favour of a seat on the Management Board
for each Member State, and a smaller Bureau for day-to-day business.
The UK made a declaration to the minutes setting out reservations
on the chosen legal base and supported a German minute statement
stating that decisions on financial aspects must not prejudice
the Financial Perspectives. The Deputy Minister for Women, Meg
Munn will be writing to you in more detail to update you on the
outcome of this institute.
The Council adopted without discussion Conclusions
on follow-up to the Beijing platform.
The Council received information on a Commission
report on a proposed year of mobility of European Workers (2006),
and also on the Commission Communication on non-discrimination
and a decision on a European Year of Equal Opportunities (2007).
10 June 2005
Letter from the Secretary of State for Trade and
Industry, at the Department of Trade and Industry (Alan Johnson
MP) to the Chairman of the Committee
Competitiveness Council, 6-7 June 2005
This letter outlines the discussion on each agenda
item and the UK position taken at the 6-7 June Competitiveness
Council — the last under the Luxembourg Presidency. I attended
on 6 June, Lord Sainsbury on 7 June.
At the first day of the Council, Economics Ministers
discussed the Services Directive, Better Regulation and REACH
(the chemicals Regulation).
Over lunch, the Presidency gave an update on the
state of play regarding work on the proposal to establish an internal
market for services in the EU. The Council confirmed its intention
to continue work on this high priority dossier in conjunction
with the European Parliament, which is due to give its views on
the proposal in the Autumn. I confirmed that the UK would continue
discussions on the Directive under our Presidency.
Ministers agreed conclusions on Better Regulation,
which welcomed recent developments, included the Commission's
March Communication on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs,
and set out work needed to achieve progress on this agenda over
coming months. I emphasised the need to focus on delivery of results
and the priority the UK will attach to EU Better Regulation during
the forthcoming Presidency. I explained that in addition to devoting
formal Competitiveness Council time to reviewing progress, we
would have a session on Better Regulation at the informal of the
Competitiveness Council meeting in Cardiff in July.
Ministers had a discussion on REACH based on Presidency
questions about the role of the planned European Chemicals Agency
and impact assessment work carried out on the proposal. There
was consensus that the European Chemicals Agency should have a
stronger role in evaluating registration dossiers and chemical
substances via a network of competent national authorities. The
Council asked its preparatory bodies to further examine the options,
paying due regard to resource implications. Ministers agreed that
the impact assessment work done so far, particularly regarding
the impacts on SMEs, provided a good basis for moving forward
towards political agreement. I said that the UK would press ahead
with negotiations under our Presidency with a view to achieving
this goal.
The Council took three Any Other Business points
on 6 June. The first was an information point from the Commission
on the SOLVIT system for solving problems with the functioning
of the Internal Market. Commissioner McCreevy highlighted its
benefits and the increase in usage but underlined the need for
Member States to devote sufficient finance and staff to the national
SOLVIT centres. The second AoB item was a presentation from the
Commission on the new proposal for a Health and Consumer Strategy
for 2007-2013. Finally, as requested by the Danes, the Council
had a brief exchange on the situation in the fish processing industry
relating to the Commission's recent decision to impose temporary
anti-dumping measures on the import of Norwegian salmon. I did
not intervene on any of these AoB points.
The second day of the Council focussed on research
issues. Discussion of the proposal for the seventh framework programme
for research and technological development (FP7) was based around
a set of Presidency questions on thematic priorities, SME involvement,
human resources, collaborative research, dissemination, and management
and implementation. Ministers also talked about the establishment
of a European Research Council over lunch. Commissioner Potocnik
highlighted the importance of the financial perspectives negotiations
for FP7. Lord Sainsbury said that new thinking was needed on how
best to meet the needs of SMEs in FP7 and underlined the importance
of building on programmes with a record of strong SME participation.
He also highlighted the importance of developing an effective
system for disseminating policy-relevant research to Member States.
The Council invited the Committee of Permanent Representatives
(COREPER) to continue examination of the FP7 proposal under the
co-decision procedure with the European Parliament
The Commission gave a brief update on the state of
play in international negotiations to decide the location of the
ITER project (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor).
The Council invited the Commission to continue pursuing an agreement
in line with its negotiating mandate and the 2005 Spring European
Council conclusions.
Research Ministers took one point of Any Other Business
concerning a proposal to improve admission procedures for third
country researchers wishing to work in the EU. The Commission
asked that the Council adopt the proposal as soon as possible.
The Netherlands supported but there was no discussion. The UK
has not opted in to this proposal.
Following the conclusion of Competitiveness Council
business, the second ever Space Council meeting was convened —
a joint EU and European Space Agency (ESA) meeting. The Luxembourg
and (German co-chairs outlined progress since the first Space
Council meeting in November 2004 and ESA's achievements during
its thirty years in existence. Discussion focussed on the developing
priorities for the European Space Programme, roles and responsibilities
of the parties involved, identifying industrial policy options,
funding and implementation issues. There was broad agreement that
the space industry was important to the EU's future competitiveness
and growth and relevant to a range of other EU policies leading
to a need for special recognition of the sector's significance.
Lord Sainsbury praised ESA for its many achievements to date but
stated that more thought should be given to how its role should
develop in an evolving external context. A set of Orientations
was agreed that set out guiding principles for the creation of
the European Space Programme.
20 June 2005
Letter from the Departmental Scrutiny Co-ordinator,
at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (James Eke) to the Clerk
of the Committee
Outcome of the 13/14 June 2005 General Affairs
and External Relations Council
My Right Honourable Friend the Foreign Secretary
represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations
Council (GAERC) in Luxembourg on 13/14 June.
Conclusions were agreed on Croatia, Cuba, Western
Balkans, Central Asia and Uzbekistan.
GENERAL AFFAIRS SESSION
Financial Frameworks 2007-13 (held in Conclave
on 12 June)
The Council exchanged views on a revised version
of the Presidency's "negotiating box". The discussion
covered both expenditure and own resources. The Presidency aims
to reach a political agreement at the June European Council.
The Government's position on future financing remains that the
Commission's proposals for real terms spending increases of 35%
from 2007 to 2013 are unrealistic and unacceptable. We have consistently
argued that the priorities of an enlarged Union can be met within
a budget of 1% EU Gross National Income (GNI). The Foreign Secretary
continued to argue that the UK abatement remained justified and
necessary because of the inequities on the expenditure side of
the EU budget.
PREPARATION FOR THE JUNE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
The Council examined draft Conclusions prepared by
the presidency for the European Council. The draft Conclusions
cover the following areas:
— Financial
Frameworks 2007-13;
— Strategy
for economic reforms and sustainable development;
— Justice
and Home Affairs (terrorism, in particular); and
— Foreign
Affairs.
The European Council will also discuss the state
of the ratification process for the constitutional Treaty.
EXTERNAL RELATIONS SESSION
Western Balkans
The Council welcomed the joint High Representative
Solana/Commissioner Rehn paper on the EU's future role in Kosovo
and the decision to engage in a comprehensive review of the implementation
of the standards in Kosovo. The opening of discussions on the
future status of Kosovo will depend on the positive outcome of
this review. The Council discussed the contribution of the EU
to the current process and agreed that it should continue to play
an important role. The Council agreed, that whatever its future
status, Kosovo has the same European perspective as the rest of
the region. The European Council adopted a declaration on Kosovo.
The Council also agreed Conclusions on Kosovo, Bosnia and regional
cooperation. The Government welcomes the constructive paper setting
out the possible EU role and contribution in Kosovo. It offers
helpful insights into how the EU might assist in developing Kosovo's
European integration perspective and looks forward to discussing
its recommendations further.
MIDDLE EAST/IRAQ
Over lunch, the Foreign Secretary gave a readout
to Partners on his visit to the region. EU Ministers had a short
discussion on the Middle East Peace Process, including the latest
developments on Gaza withdrawal and the prospect of a meeting
between the Israeli Prime Minister and the President of the Palestinian
Authority scheduled for 21 June. The Government welcomes the possibility
of the meeting. It is regarded as an important step in the resumption
of the political negotiations necessary for a fair and lasting
peace. Additionally, the Government believes it important that
the EU and the wider international community support Jim Wolfensohn's
work on Gaza disengagement.
The Presidency briefed the Council on the EU Troika's
(Foreign Ministers Assleborn and Straw, Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner
and High Representative Solana) 9 June visit to Baghdad. They
met the Iraqi President, Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, the
Transitional National Assembly Speaker and the Chair of the Constitutional
Committee, as well as representatives of the Sunni community.
In their discussions, they emphasised the importance of an inclusive
political process, based on national dialogue involving all communities.
The Council thanked the Troika and highlighted that it represented
a new stage in the strengthening of EU/Iraqi relations. The Troika
visit sent a powerful message of EU support to the Iraqi Transitional
Government and for the transitional process. It is Important
that the EU continues to engage on the constitutional referendum
and subsequent elections.
The Presidency also informed Member States of the
preparations for the 22 June International Conference with Iraq
(co-organised by the EU and the US) in Brussels. The Conference
will provide a forum for the Iraqi Transitional Government to
present its priorities, vision and strategy for the transitional
period leading to the next round of elections at the end of the
year. It will be also an occasion to mobilise international support
for the Iraqi Transitional Government and its institutions. The
Conference will be organised around the three topics evoked in
UN Security Council Resolution 1546: the political process; economic
challenges and reconstruction; and the rule of law. The Government
welcomes the efforts of the Presidency and the Commission to pull
the Conference together with the US and Iraqi Governments.
SUDAN
Over lunch, High Representative Solana informed Ministers
of the state of work relating to EU support for the reinforcement
of the African Union's AMIS II mission in Sudan, following the
donors conference held on 26 May in Addis Ababa. The Government
agrees on the need to urgently define the EU's contribution and
to focus on firming up Member States' pledges to meet the African
Union's requirements.
ZIMBABWE
The Foreign Secretary raised the crackdown on shantytowns
on 8 June within the framework of operations "Clean Sweep"
and "Restore Order". These operations resulted in more
than 20,000 arrests, the destruction of residential property and
the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people inside the
country. The EU condemned the actions carried out by the Zimbabwean
government and called the government to put an end to these operations.
The Government believes that President Mugabe's latest actions
are taking Zimbabwe yet further away from prosperity, stability
and respect for human rights.
CUBA
The Council had an exchange of views on its policy
towards Cuba; reviewed its 1996 Common Position on Cuba (which
had encouraged pluralist democracy, respect for human rights and
improvement of standards of living); and re-examined the January
2005 decision to suspend punitive measures, adopted in June 2003,
pending improvement in the human rights situation. Ministers agreed
Conclusions which reaffirmed the validity of the Common Position
and rolled over the suspension until June 2006, while noting continued
human rights concerns. There was no substantive discussion of
who Member States should be allowed to invite to national day
celebrations. The Government welcomes the Presidency's draft
Conclusions. The text is suitably tough on human rights and reaffirms
the EU's commitment to intensified dialogue with the peaceful
opposition in Cuba, whilst allowing the EU to continue to engage
with the Cuban government.
TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS
The Presidency informed the Council on the current
state-of-play on the preparations for the EU/Canada Summit planned
for 19 June in Niagara-on-the-Lake and the EU/US Summit in Washington
on 20 June.
UN MILLENNIUM REVIEW SUMMIT
The Council held an exchange of views on the preparation
for the 14-16 September UN Millennium Review Summit. The Irish
Foreign Minister highlighted his work as a special representative
of the UN Secretary General for the preparation of the Summit.
The Summit provides the EU the occasion to reiterate its support
for effective multilateralism and reform of the UN. The Government
believes the Summit is an excellent opportunity to achieve much
needed reform at the UN, particularly in the areas of development,
human rights, security and reform of the UN Secretariat. We welcome
agreement on the importance of a successful outcome at the Millennium
Review Summit. The Government also welcomes publication of the
General Assembly President Ping's draft Summit Outcome Document.
CENTRAL ASIA/UZBEKISTAN
The Council agreed Conclusions which restated the
EU's deep concern about recent events in Uzbekistan and set a
deadline of the end of June 2005 for Uzbekistan to reconsider
its refusal to accept an independent enquiry into events in Andijan.
The Council will keep under review the case for a partial suspension
of co-operation mechanisms in the event that the Uzbek authorities
fail to reconsider their position. After a brief discussion the
Council agreed additional text urging the Uzbek regime to allow
access to humanitarian agencies such as the UN High Commission
for Refugees. The Government welcomes the deadline of the end
of June for the Uzbekistan Government to reconsider its position.
It is important that the EU and OSCE are ready to turn words
into action if the Uzbek government remains intransigent.
The Council also agreed Conclusions to create an
EU Special Representative for Central Asia. The Council invited
the relevant Working Groups to prepare a Joint Action. The Government
welcomes the creation of a dedicated EU Special Representative
for Central Asia. An effectively mandated Special Representative
has the potential to enhance the EU's engagement in an increasingly
important region and provide the EU with a dedicated and expert
interlocutor.
17 June 2005
Letter from the Minister for Europe, at the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office (Douglas Alexander MP) to the Chairman
of the Committee
I thought you and your Committee would like to be
made aware of decisions taken at the General Affairs and External
Relations Council on 13 June on language policy in the EU.
The most important decision was the Council's adoption
of conclusions, on a proposal from Spain, for a degree of official
recognition in the EU of all languages that have official status
in Member States, either through their Constitutions or national
law. These conclusions allow Member States to enter into an arrangement
with the EU institutions over which languages may be used in relations
with them, with the requesting Member State meeting all the direct
or indirect costs incurred. The purpose of this is to allow,
in the first instance, Spanish citizens to communicate with the
Institutions in Spanish regional languages. The texts make clear
that this can only happen if there is no effect on the otherwise
efficient functioning of the Institutions. I attach the conclusions
and related texts.
The Council also agreed to add Irish as an official
and working language of the EU. (It is of course already a Treaty
language.) This was done by means of an amendment to Regulation
1/58, which can be done without a Commission proposal. The cost
will be €3.5 million per year, to be met from the annual
administrative ceiling, with a separate one-off cost for introducing
a new language of €960,000. This will have to be met from
within the next financial perspective ceiling.
The Government supports both decisions. In particular,
the Spanish-inspired proposals offer a way, at no cost to anyone
apart from Spain, of helping bring citizens closer to the EU,
by allowing them to use the language with which they are most
familiar when dealing with it. It is of course possible that
there will be pressure from speakers of other EU regional languages
to have the same treatment.
20 June 2005
| 
