Select Committee on European Scrutiny Ninth Report


7 European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

(26834)

12143/05

COM(05) 399

Draft regulation on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

Legal baseArticle 152 EC; co-decision; QMV
Document originated31 August 2005
Deposited in Parliament16 September 2005
DepartmentHealth
Basis of considerationEM of 6 October 2005
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentLegally important
Committee's decisionNot cleared; further information requested

Background

7.1 The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) was set up in 1993.[28] It is an EU agency which collects, analyses and disseminates information on drugs and drug addiction.

7.2 Article 152(4) of the EC Treaty provides for the Council to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the Article by adopting:

  • measures on standards for organs and substances of human origin, blood and blood derivatives;
  • veterinary and phytosanitary measures with the objective of protecting human health; and
  • incentive measures designed to protect and improve human health.

7.3 Article 308 of the EC Treaty provides that if, in the course of the operation of the common market, it is necessary to attain one of the objectives of the Community and the Treaty has not provided the necessary powers, the Council (acting unanimously) may take the appropriate measures.

The document

7.4 The Regulation which set up the EMCDDA in 1993 has been amended three times. The Commission believes that further changes are now necessary to, for example, widen the scope of the Centre's work to reflect recent trends in drug misuse, change the composition of the Management Board and the responsibilities of the Director and create an Executive Committee. Rather than making further amendments to the original Regulation, the Commission proposes a new Regulation incorporating the existing amendments and the new proposals.

7.5 In 2004, the previous Committee considered the first draft of the new Regulation. The legal base for the proposal was Article 308 of the EC Treaty. Our predecessors concluded that the document was not of sufficient legal or political interest to warrant a substantive report to the House and cleared it from scrutiny.[29]

7.6 During the Council Working Group discussions of that draft, some Member States argued that Article 152 of the EC Treaty was a more appropriate legal base than Article 308. So the Commission withdrew the draft and produced the current document. The legal base is the only difference of substance between the two texts. The current text cites Article 152.

The Government's view

7.7 The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department of Health (Lord Warner) tells us that the Government broadly supports the revised text (as it supported the first draft). But the Government considers that Article 308 is the more appropriate legal base because Article 152 does not provide the necessary power. The establishment of a body, such as the EMCDDA, does not constitute an incentive measure.

7.8 The Minister says that:

    "A statement registering the UK's preference for the use of Article 308 was, therefore, included in the minutes of the Council meeting at which the draft proposal based on Article 308 was withdrawn. The UK also plans to enter a similar statement in the minutes of the Council meeting at which the regulation is to be adopted."

Conclusion

7.9 We share the Government's view that Article 152 of the EC Treaty would not provide a suitable legal base for the draft Regulation, since it involves the amendment of a Regulation which was itself adopted under what is the new Article 308 EC.

7.10 It is arguable, perhaps, that Article 308 EC, too, is not wholly appropriate because the establishment of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction is not necessary "in the operation of the common market". But that Article (formerly Article 235) was accepted as the legal base for the original Regulation in 1993 and for the three subsequent amending measures. Moreover, it is arguable that the Monitoring Centre helps improve public health and, therefore, the fitness of the labour force and so contributes to the operation of the common market.

7.11 On balance, therefore, we share the Government's view that Article 308 EC would provide a suitable legal base for the proposal. Accordingly, we question whether it is sufficient for the Government merely to register its view in a minute statement, and whether the Government should not vote against the adoption of the draft Regulation on a legal basis which it considers to be inadequate. We should be grateful for the Minister's comment on the question. We shall keep the document under scrutiny pending his reply.


28   Council Regulation (EEC) No. 302/93: OJ No. L 36, 12.2.1993, p.1. Back

2 29  9 (25287) 5085/04: HC 42-xi (2003-04), para 24 (25 February 2004). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 18 November 2005