Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twelfth Report


18 EU enlargement: Turkey

(27007)

14216/05

COM(05) 559

Draft Council Decision on the Principles, Priorities and Conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with Turkey

Legal baseCouncil Regulation (EC) No 390/2001; QMV
Document originated9 November 2005
Deposited in Parliament18 November 2005
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office
Basis of considerationEM of 21 November 2005
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in Council12 December 2005 General Affairs and External Relations Council
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

18.1 At its meeting in Copenhagen in December 2002, the European Council strongly welcomed the important steps taken by Turkey towards meeting the Copenhagen criteria,[30] and identified a number of priority areas for further work. In order to assist Turkey in its preparations towards EU membership, the European Council decided that the accession strategy for Turkey should be strengthened and invited the Commission to submit a proposal for an Accession Partnership. This was first adopted in 2001. In March 2003 the Commission presented a revised Accession Partnership with Turkey, which was adopted by the Council.

18.2 In its recommendation of October 2004, the Commission proposed, in view of guaranteeing the sustainability and the irreversibility of the political reform process, the EU should continue to monitor closely progress of the political reforms. In particular, the Commission proposed the agreement of a revised Accession Partnership in 2005.

The Council Decision

18.3 The Council Decision enacts the renewed Accession Partnership, whose principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions are set out in the annex thereto, and provides for it to be examined and monitored under the association agreement and in annual reports to the Council by the Commission.

18.4 The renewed Accession Partnership lists short (1-2 years) and medium term (3-4 years) priorities for Turkey's preparations for further integration with the European Union. Turkey is expected to respond by preparing a plan with a timetable and specific measures detailing how they intend to address the priorities. The main priorities relate to its capacity to meet the Copenhagen criteria and the requirements of the negotiating framework adopted by the Council on 3 October 2005.

18.5 Under Enhanced Political Dialogue and Political Criteria, they cover:

  • Democracy and the Rule of Law (public administration, civil/military relations, judicial system);
  • Human Rights and the Protection Of Minorities (observance of international human rights law; prevention of torture and ill treatment; access to justice; freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly; freedom of religion; women's rights; trade union rights; the situation in the east and south-east); and
  • Regional Issues and International Obligations - Cyprus; peaceful settlement of border disputes; implementation of commitments under the Association Agreement and Customs union.

18.6 In addition, there is an extensive list of requirements under The Ability To Assume The Obligations Of Membership. The priorities concern both legislation and the implementation thereof.

The Government's view

18.7 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 21 November 2005, the Minister of State for Europe in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Mr Douglas Alexander) says:

"The launch of accession negotiations on 3 October was a historic day for Turkey and the EU, and should serve to assist Turkey in carrying forward its impressive reform programme of recent years. Accession negotiations have opened, but both the EU and Turkey agree that the process is likely to take many years. During this time, there are many issues on which Turkey and the EU will need to work hard, but the onus will be on Turkey to maintain its reforms aimed at alignment with EU standards.

"Looking forward, the Accession Partnership, together with the European Commission's annual Regular Reports, provides the tool to guide Turkey's next steps on reform. Advancement in the negotiations will be measured against Turkey's progress in addressing the priorities identified. Much remains to be done, but the Government believes that the perspective of EU membership has acted as a major impetus to reform in Turkey, and that, with the launch of negotiations, institutional convergence towards EU standards should continue."

18.8 He expects the Council Decision to be agreed at the 12 December General Affairs and External Relations Council.

Conclusion

18.9 The House has endorsed Turkish membership of the EU on a number of occasions. The requirements in the Accession Partnership nonetheless indicate the depth and breadth of what needs to be done before accession can become a reality. We look forward to discussing them during our forthcoming visit to Ankara.

18.10 In the meantime, we now clear the document.




30   Stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities; a functioning market economy, as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union; the ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.

 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 12 December 2005