Select Committee on European Scrutiny Sixteenth Report


11  SUPPORT FOR ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES

(27114) 
15745/05
COM(05) 627

+ ADD 1 
Commission Communication: The support of electricity from renewable
energy sources
  
  
Commission staff working document: impact assessment


Legal base
Document originated7 December 2005
Deposited in Parliament 19 December 2005
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of consideration EM of 12 January 2006
Previous Committee Report None
Discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

11.1 In 2001, the Council adopted a Directive ("the Renewables Directive") aimed at increasing the contribution of renewable energy sources to electricity production.[36] For the purposes of the Directive:

  • "renewable energy sources" means renewable non-fossil energy sources (wind, solar, geothermal, wave, tide, hydro-power, biomass, landfill gas, sewage treatment plant gas and biogases);
  • "biomass" means the biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues from agriculture, forestry and related industries, as well as the biodegradable fraction of industrial and municipal waste.

11.2 The main provisions of the Directive are as follows:

  • Member States should encourage greater use of electricity from renewable sources.
  • In 2002 and every five years thereafter, Member States should set national indicative ten-year targets for future consumption of electricity produced from renewable sources (the UK's indicative target for 2010 is 10%). The collective target for the EC is 21% by 2010.
  • Member States should report every two years on their progress towards achieving their indicative targets; and the Commission should produce two-yearly assessments based on those reports.
  • The Commission should report before the end of 2005 on Member States' systems of financial support to promote the consumption of electricity produced from renewable sources.
  • Member States should: ensure stable investment conditions for the production of electricity from renewable sources by removing administrative barriers; ensure fair access to the electricity grid; and issue guarantees of the origin of electricity produced from renewable sources.

11.3 Article 174 of the EC Treaty specifies the objectives to which Community policy on the environment should contribute. The objectives include preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment; protecting human health; and prudent utilisation of natural resources. Article 175(2)(c) empowers the Council to adopt "measures significantly affecting a Member State's choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply".

The document

11.4 The purpose of the Communication is:

  • to discharge the Commission's obligation under Article 4 of the Renewables Directive to report before the end of 2005 on the extent to which Member States' "support systems" have succeeded in promoting the consumption of electricity produced from renewable sources ("green electricity"); and
  • to report progress on the removal of administrative barriers to the production of green electricity and ensuring fair access to the electricity grid.

The Commission staff working document (ADD 1) provides detailed information in support of the Communication.

SUPPORT SYSTEMS

11.5 Member States are currently operating four different support systems: feed-in tariffs; green certificates; tendering; and tax incentives.

11.6 Feed-in tariffs: this is the system used by most Member States, including Denmark, Germany, France and Spain. The competent national authority sets a price or premium (usually fixed for several years) that electricity companies must pay domestic producers of green electricity. The price or premium takes account of the higher cost of production from renewable sources. The cost of the support system is met by electricity suppliers in proportion to their shares of total sales.

11.7 The Commission says that feed-in tariffs:

    "have the advantages of investment security, the possibility of fine-tuning and the promotion of mid- and long-term technologies. On the other hand, they are difficult to harmonise at EU level, may be challenged under internal market principles and involve a risk of over-funding ….".[37]

11.8 Green certificates: this system is currently in use in the Belgium, Italy, Poland, Sweden and the UK. In order to help cover the additional cost of generating energy from renewables, electricity consumers (or, in some countries, producers) are required to buy a specified number of green certificates from the generators.

11.9 The Commission says that

    "Since producers/consumers wish to buy [green] certificates as cheaply as possible, a secondary market of certificates develops where [green electricity] producers compete with one another to sell green certificates. Therefore, green certificates are market-based instruments, which have the theoretical potential, if functioning well, of ensuring best value for investment. These systems could work well in a single European market and have in theory a lower risk of over-funding. However, green certificates may pose a higher risk for investors …".[38]

The Commission adds that high-cost technologies might not easily develop under a green certificate system and that the administrative costs of the system are currently higher than those for other support systems.

11.10 Tendering: the competent national authority places a series of tenders for the supply of green electricity, which is then supplied at the price resulting from the tender. The Commission comments that, although tendering systems theoretically make optimum use of market forces, they have a stop-go nature which is not conducive to stable conditions. France and Ireland intend to combine tendering with feed-in tariffs.

11.11 Tax incentives: these are applied in Malta and Finland. Some other countries (including the UK) combine tax incentives with other support systems.

11.12 The Commission's assessment of these support systems is confined to their application to electricity generation from wind, biomass, biogas, small hydro and solar photovoltaic. It does not cover large hydro because it is well-developed and does not need support; and it does not cover geothermal energy, wave, tidal and solar thermal either because Member States do not support them or because they are not in industrial use.

ADMINISTRATIVE BARRIERS, AND GRID ISSUES

11.13 The Commission recommends Member States to:

  • appoint "one-stop-shops" to coordinate the work of all the national, regional and local authorities which have a part to play in the authorisation of green electricity generation projects and to help applicants for authorisation;
  • issue guidelines on authorisation procedures based on objective, non-discriminatory criteria; and
  • establish mechanisms to pre-plan land use for renewables.

11.14 The Commission argues that an independent Transmission System Operator and an independent Distribution System Operator are essential — but not yet to be found in all Member States — to ensuring fair access to the electricity grid and the development of the green electricity. It also calls for the charges for use of the grid to be open and non-discriminatory; and for the grid's infrastructure to be developed so as to accommodate the increases in electricity generated from renewable sources.

THE COMMISSION'S CONCLUSIONS

11.15 The Commission concludes that harmonisation of support systems would be very difficult to achieve in the short term. Moreover, short-term changes might disrupt markets and make it more difficult for Member States to achieve their targets for 2010. In any event, it is too soon to compare the merits of well-established systems, such as feed-in tariffs, with those of newer ones, such as green certificates. The Commission concludes that it would not be appropriate to propose a harmonised European system at this stage.

11.16 Meanwhile, the Commission suggests that:

  • Member States which have similar support systems should cooperate to improve and perhaps move towards harmonisation of their systems; and
  • Member States should "optimise" their systems by, for example, doing more to provide stable and predictable conditions for investment in green electricity projects, cut red-tape, and ensure fair access to the electricity grid.

The Commission intends to do further work on the options for and effects of increased cooperation and harmonisation and will present a report on its findings by the end of 2007.

The Government's view

11.17 The Minister for Energy at the Department of Trade and Industry (Malcolm Wicks) tells us that the Government agrees with the Commission that it would not be sensible at present to try to harmonise green energy support systems; and, indeed, the Government doubts whether harmonisation is either necessary or viable in the longer term. He also says that the Government believes that the UK is making good progress in increasing the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources.

Conclusion

11.18 The use of renewable sources to generate electricity is an important subject and of wide interest, not least because of recent concerns about the security of energy supplies from abroad. Accordingly, we draw this Communication to the attention of the House.

11.19 We understand why the Commission and the Government consider that it would be premature to move towards a single support system to increase the generation of green electricity. It may be, however, that this will be needed in due course to help establish the single European energy market. We look forward, therefore, to the further report the Commission will be making make next year. Meanwhile, we are content to clear this document from scrutiny.



36   Directive 2001/77/EC, OJ No. L 283, 27.10.2001, p.33. Back

37   Commission Communication, page 4. Back

38   Commission Communication, page 5. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 2 February 2006