Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Third Report


16 Motor vehicle type approval

(a)

(24767)

11641/03

COM(03) 418

(b)

(26127)

14469/04

COM(04) 738


Draft Directive on the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles

Amended draft Directive on the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles

Legal baseArticle 95 EC; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentTransport
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 10 March 2006
Previous Committee ReportsHC 42-xiv (2003-04), para 4 (24 March 2004) and HC 38-ii (2004-05), para 2 (8 December 2004)
To be discussed in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

16.1 Design and construction standards for motor vehicles in the Community are governed by Framework Directive 70/156/EEC.[61] Its object is to achieve a single market through harmonized safety and environmental standards, using the concept of type approval. Type approval involves testing prototypes, and it ensures that manufacturers are able to produce products in conformity with the type approval. Currently, the Framework Directive is supplemented by over 50 Directives prescribing standards for individual components and systems. Vehicles approved individually, for example for specialist manufacturers, amateur builders or imports from non-EU markets, are outside the scope of the framework Directive. The UK has single-vehicle approval schemes for these.

16.2 The draft Directive, document (a), would repeal and replace the Framework Directive. It would make the following main changes to the present regime:

  • enable EC Whole Vehicle Type Approval (ECWVTA) to be granted to vehicle categories other than cars within 12 months of the new Directive being adopted;
  • make ECWVTA mandatory for goods vehicles, large passenger vehicles and trailers over the period 1 July 2007 to 1 January 2012 and for "special purpose" passenger cars, such as ambulances, motor caravans, hearses and armoured vehicles from 1 July 2007 for new types and from 1 July 2009 for all vehicles not by then in service;
  • for passenger cars, create a new tier of "EC harmonized small series type approval" but within tight quantitative limits, and reduce the scope for Member States to have national type approval schemes, both in terms of quantitative limits and in terms of deciding proportionate technical standards;
  • bring vehicles approved individually within the scope of the Framework Directive; and
  • make various procedural changes, generally reflecting practical experience.

16.3 Document (b) is an amended draft Directive presented by the Commission after its consideration of European Parliament first reading amendments and of points made in Council Working Group discussions. The Commission rejected the majority of the European Parliament's amendments and made only partial concessions on most of the others. Although there were some developments — particularly on matters of detail — the overall position remained largely unaltered by the new document.

16.4 The main features of document (b) are:

  • a change to the scope of the draft Directive means certain special-purpose vehicle categories, for example those used by the police, could get an approval, although some restrictions would still apply;
  • the Commission makes only a small concession on the numerical limits for "small series" car approvals. "Mutual recognition" provisions would rely on a measure of "equivalence" with Directives — the European Parliament wanted "satisfactory" standards and the Government advocated "maximum practical level" of safety and environmental protection. For example, it would be impossible to establish whether an individual bespoke car met the front and side impact requirements for mass-produced vehicles without destructive testing. In such cases, equivalence could not be established, but an engineering judgment could be made on the best level of protection in the circumstances;
  • the Commission makes no concessions on the mandatory application dates for new approval requirements; and
  • numerous, generally minor, changes to procedures and definitions and largely reflecting Council Working Group discussions to facilitate the move to EC type and individual approval for all vehicle categories.

16.5 Whilst welcoming the principle of the original draft Directive, document (a), the Government was concerned about quantitative limits for harmonized EC and national "small series" type approval, proposed transitional lead times, adjustments to technical requirements for low-volume manufacture and allowing Member States derogations for domestic needs on national type approvals and individual approvals. In March 2004, the previous Committee reported some helpful amendments from the European Parliament's first reading but little progress in the Council Working Group on these issues. It kept the document under scrutiny pending more encouraging progress. When our predecessors considered the revised draft Directive, document (b), they noted their disappointment at seeing little useful progress, encouraged the Government to maintain its robust stance in negotiations and continued to hold the documents under scrutiny pending more encouraging developments.[62]

The Minister's letter

16.6 The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Dr Stephen Ladyman) writes now to tell us of the latest developments on this proposal. He says that progress made in the second half of 2005 has secured a basis for political agreement, which is expected to be formally adopted during the Austrian Presidency. He adds that discussions will be taking place to determine whether a second-reading deal with the European Parliament will be possible.

16.7 The Minister says that overall the text is now acceptable for the UK. On the specific points drawn to the attention of the previous Committee he reports that:

  • there are increases in the number of vehicles permitted to enter service under the "small series" type approval schemes — from 50 to 75 per type per year for national approvals and from 300 to 1,000 per type per year for the harmonized EC small series scheme. UK industry interests have said that, whilst not ideal, these limits are reasonable in the context of an overall package with off-setting advantages of easier access to European markets for low-volume producers;
  • there are exemptions from prohibitively expensive approval elements such as destructive testing and the "on-board diagnostic" elements of exhaust emission control systems, which are only viable for mass-production;
  • the Government's case for standards for individual approvals that achieve the "maximum practical level of protection", rather than the Commission's proposal for equivalence with type approval standards, has been accepted; and
  • for transitional lead-times there are compromise periods roughly midway between the Government's ideal and the Commission's proposals. But given the prolonged negotiating period the net effect is actually not too far from what the Government originally wanted and UK industry interests are broadly content.

16.8 The Minister says also that there is provision for Member States to contribute to a review of the new type approval procedures within 24 months of the Directive's application and for a subsequent review by the European Parliament.

16.9 Finally, the Minister adds that, although the draft Directive has yet to be adopted and to be transposed into national legislation the department is developing a comprehensive implementation plan that will involve industry and other interested parties, in order to produce user-friendly procedures for both granting and accepting vehicle approvals under the anticipated new regime.

Conclusion

16.10 We are grateful to the Minister for this report and note the improvements to the text which have been achieved. We have no further questions and now clear the documents.



61   OJ No. L 42, 23.2.1970, p. 1. Back

62   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 11 April 2006