Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Ninth Report


2 Taxation

(27425)

8231/06

COM(06)157

Commission Communication: Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: Progress to date and steps towards a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)

Legal base
Document originated5 April 2006
Deposited in Parliament12 April 2006
DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of considerationEM of 26 April 2006
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in Council7 June 2006
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared, further information requested

Background

2.1 For some years the Commission has made plain its hope of introducing harmonisation of direct taxation for companies, in particular by establishing a "Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base" (a CCCTB). It last published a Communication specifically on this subject in November 2003.[3] But it has alluded to the matter on many other occasions, particularly recently in the context of the re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy to make the Community "the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world" by 2010. It has announced its intention to table a proposal for a CCCTB during 2008.[4] In response to all this the Government has consistently made clear that direct taxation is primarily a matter for Member States and that in its view fair tax competition, not tax harmonisation, is the basis on which the Community can compete with the rest of the world.

2.2 The idea underlying the concept of a CCCTB is that the Community should develop a common set of rules for a corporate tax base that would either replace or operate alongside Member States' national tax rules. Although not yet fully formulated the basic idea is for harmonisation of all aspects of the corporate tax system except the corporate tax rate.

The document

2.3 In the autumn of 2004 the Commission established a technical working group, the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Working Group (CCCTB WG), initially for a period of three years, to look at technical aspects of a harmonised company tax base. Technical work in this group is being taken forward on a strictly without prejudice basis and without political commitments from Member States. This document has a dual purpose: to report on progress on work to date and to draw attention to areas where the Commission believes political support and direction from Member States would be desirable.

2.4 The Commission says that:

  • its overall approach since the formation of the CCCTB WG has been in line with a non-paper it presented to an informal ECOFIN Council in September 2004;
  • all Member States have participated in the meetings of the CCCTB WG "although it is acknowledged that participation does not necessarily imply support for the concept of a CCCTB";
  • the CCCTB WG is composed principally of experts from Member States, but is extended on an "ad hoc basis to include experts from business and academia"; and
  • the Commission's working documents for the CCCTB WG and the details of CCCTB WG meetings have been made public on a series of dedicated web pages.

2.5 The Commission reports briefly on work on "the structural technical elements of the tax base", highlighting four areas on which there have been discussions:

  • assets and tax depreciation;
  • reserves, provisions and liabilities;
  • taxable income; and
  • international aspects of a CCCTB.

An annex gives a brief account of the work on each of these areas to date. The Commission notes that in each area issues have been identified where experts are divided and that the issues are particularly wide-ranging in the case of international aspects as they concern relations with third countries.

2.6 The Commission summarises its future work programme:

  • the CCCTB WG to broadly complete the work on the four areas presently reported in 2006;
  • the CCCTB WG should begin technical work later in 2006 on consolidation, allocation (the mechanism for sharing out taxable profits between Member States) and the structural and legal framework for a CCCTB. On the first two the Commission comments that they are "extremely complex, and will require significant work";
  • plan for a further progress report on the technical work for the beginning of 2007; and
  • begin work on remaining elements in 2007, followed by a second round of discussions on all structural elements.

The Commission envisages that this timetable "would enable the Commission to complete the work and present a comprehensive Community legislative instrument at the end of 2008".

2.7 The Commission gives it views on a number of issues. Its comments include:

  • in the absence of harmonisation of company accounting in the Community, International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards could only be used to help provide a common language and some common definitions;
  • a base should be consolidated from the outset;
  • a CCCTB should initially be proposed as optional for   companies. The Commission observes that "the simultaneous operation of two corporate tax bases … admittedly may raise specific issues for tax administrations", but "it is also the Commission's view that an optional CCCTB is more likely to gain the support of all Member States an of business than a compulsory CCCTB"; and
  • there are difficulties with the technical work and that demands on staff resources have increased. The Commission comments that the matter "is a challenging exercise and, if it is to be achieved, more commitment, from more Member States, will be required".

2.8 Finally, the Commission says it would welcome political support and direction from Member States for its conclusions, which are:

"Although the definition of the CCCTB can be conceptually inspired by corresponding international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS), no formal link between the two should be established, because not all companies are able to use IAS/IFRS and the standards change frequently. The CCCTB legislation should therefore be a self-standing document containing all the necessary definitions for determining taxable profits.

"The initial work programme for the CCCTB, which envisaged a tax base optional for companies, with consolidation, and shared between Member States, remains the best approach to achieving the implementation of the CCCTB and the consequent contribution to the Lisbon goals. Without prejudging future political decisions, technical work should therefore progress along these lines.

"The current approach of working in close cooperation with Member State experts is the best way of ensuring that the Commission's eventual legislative proposal will be acceptable to Member States. In this way Member States can participate in the work without making a premature or final commitment to the CCCTB. Cooperation with business and academics, as illustrated by the 'extended format' meeting of the CCCTB Working Group in December, is also useful.

"Reasonable progress towards the CCCTB has been made with good input from Member State experts in the CCCTB Working Group. The quality of further work will depend on the active involvement of Member States and Commission alike.

"The introduction of a simple, modern and transparent common consolidated tax base will necessarily involve each Member State making some changes otherwise the benefits of a common base will not be realised, hence the importance of open-mindedness and flexibility by all participants in this process."

The Government's view

2.9 The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo) says forthrightly:

"The matters which are discussed in the Communication concern issues which remain a national preserve.

"The Government does not accept the need for harmonisation of company tax, including corporate tax base harmonisation. The Government remains clear that fair tax competition, not tax harmonisation, is the way forward for Europe."

2.10 The Minister continues that the Government:

  • does not think that in a global economy the Community's competitiveness would be helped by a harmonised company tax base;
  • holds that Member States participating in a CCCTB would no longer have freedom to adjust corporate tax provisions in the light of national circumstances and of global pressures and developments;
  • believes it essential for discussions on corporate tax to be set in a global, and not just a Community, context;
  • agrees with the Commission that this is an extremely complex technical exercise, but considers that the approach is misconceived and sees no need for technical work in this area;
  • will continue to make clear its scepticism about both the principles and the practicalities of the Commission's ideas in this area and to argue for a change in approach;
  • will not contemplate any action at Community level which could threaten jobs and the competitive position of UK business; and
  • has made clear that such tax matters are for Member States, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity.

Conclusion

2.11 This document makes plain the Commission's continued ambition in relation to direct corporate taxation. We note the Government's robust response to the process discussed in the document. However, given that response, we should like to hear from the Government as to why it is participating in the Commission's Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Working Group, albeit on the basis that the Communication acknowledges "that participation does not necessarily imply support for the concept" of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. It would be helpful also to know what views have been expressed in the Working Group by other Member States, such as Ireland, on the general concept of a common tax base.

2.12 Meanwhile we do not clear the document.





3   See (25104) 15361/03: HC 42-iv (2003-04), para 14 (7 January 2004). Back

4   For example see (26765) 11618/05: HC 34-x (2005-06), para 22 (16 November 2005) or (26989) 14042/05: HC 34-xii (2005-06), para 23 (30 November 2005). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 24 May 2006