Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirtieth Report


8 The 9th European Development Fund

(27469)

8671/06

COM(06) 185

Draft Council Decision on the position to be adopted by the Community within the ACP-EC Council of Ministers regarding a decision to reassign part of the reserve of the 9th European Development Fund (EDF) envelope for long-term development

Legal baseArticles 300 (2) and 310 EC; unanimity
Document originated28 April 2006
Deposited in Parliament8 May 2006
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of considerationEM of 16 May 2006
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see HC 34-xv (2005-06), para 12 (18 January 2006)
To be discussed in CouncilPrior to 31 May 2006
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

8.1 During the second half of 2005 we considered a number of documents relating to the EU's development activity, most of which revolved, in one way or another, around the EU's developmental relationship, both collective and bilateral, towards Africa. Principal among them was Commission Communication 13293/05, which was the Commission's response to the instruction from the June 2005 European Council to draw up a long-term global strategy on Africa by the December 2005 European Council.

8.2 The MDGs[27] are at the heart. The Communication suggests that the EU should focus its support in areas considered essential for attaining the MDGs (peace and security and good governance), areas that create the economic environment necessary for achieving the MDGs (economic growth, trade and interconnection) and areas directly targeting the MDGs (social cohesion, decent work, gender equality and environment). These areas should be supplemented by support for economic integration and political co-operation with the EU. The Africa Union's (AU) "Peace Facility for Africa" should be replenished and strengthened to allow it to better support Africa's own efforts in this field. The Communication includes a range of possible approaches in different areas, such as: good governance, respect for human rights and the fight against corruption; economic growth including trade and private sector development; support to increasing competitiveness of African agriculture; establishing an EU-Africa Partnership for Infrastructure; enhanced support for basic service provision in social sectors and further support for tackling poverty diseases; Migration; core labour standards; environment; and climate change.

8.3 Our consideration of this and other related documents culminated in our concluding Report on the EU Strategy for Africa finally adopted by the December 2005 European Council, which the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for International Development (Mr Gareth Thomas) refers to in his 15 May 2006 Explanatory Memorandum on this proposed Council Decision.

The proposed Council Decision

8.4 The Minister explains that this Proposal is for a Council Decision confirming the position to be taken by the Community at the Africa Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)-European Community (EC) Council of Ministers on 1-2 June regarding the transfer of €110 million (£76 million) from the reserve of the 9th European Development Fund (EDF) long-term development envelope to the regional co-operation envelope; which transfer of funds requires the approval of the ACP-EC Council of Ministers.

8.5 He says that the funds would be used to support various intra-ACP initiatives. He explains that "the existing regional co-operation envelope is fully committed and so additional resources are required The proposed initiatives for support are:

"€70 million (£49 million) for the EU-Africa Partnership for Infrastructure, of which €60 million (£42 million) would be provided to a Trust Fund managed by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and €10 million (£7 million) would finance preparatory actions and studies.

"€20 million (£14 million) to promote the active participation of ACP states in world trade, with €10 million (£7 million) in increased Community support for the multi-lateral 'Integrated Framework' initiative and up to €10 million (£7 million) for a continuation of a Community programme to help ACP states participate more actively in the World Trade Organisation.

"€9 million (£6 million) for a sugar research project to underpin measures to support reform in ACP countries affected by the reform of the EU sugar regime.

"€5 million (£3 million) for the creation of a specific allocation for scholarships for ACP students under the EC's Erasmus Mundus programme.

"€2 million (£1 million) contribution to the Trust Fund for the African Union's African Peer Review Mechanism.

"€4 million (£3 million) for a programme with UN-HABITAT to support the upgrading of slums in several ACP countries."

The Government's view

8.6 The Minister says that the UK can support the transfer and the allocation of funds to the various activities identified in the draft Council Decision, and explains that if the transfer is agreed, the EDF Management Committee will subsequently be required to approve individual funding proposals for each programme. He recalls that the establishment of an EU-Africa Partnership for Infrastructure was envisaged in the December 2005 European Council's Conclusions on the EU Strategy for Africa, and continues as follows:

"In February, the EC and EIB signed a memorandum of understanding to create a Trust Fund, to be managed by the EIB, to support infrastructure in Africa. The EC announced its intention to contribute €60 million (£42 million) in grants to the Fund with the EIB contributing €260 million (£180 million) in loans. The Government supports this initiative, which complements the Infrastructure Consortium for Africa, and welcomes the EC's proposed contribution to this effect."

8.7 He goes on to explain that the 'Integrated Framework' for the Least Developed Countries is:

"… an important multilateral initiative in trade-related capacity building. It is designed to help countries integrate trade into their national development strategies. The Government welcomes the proposed EC support to this initiative. We also support the intention to provide further funds for an existing Community programme to help ACP states participate in the World Trade Organisation. The programme was evaluated in 2004 and was considered to be providing valuable support, aimed at increasing the visibility and effectiveness of the ACP group in the Doha trade round negotiations. The evaluators recommended an extension of the programme, which will complement related Community support for the ACP group with the ongoing negotiation of Economic Partnership Agreements."

8.8 He then goes on to say that:

"The €9m (£6 million) programme to support sugar research programmes for ACP countries affected by changes to the EU sugar regime is particularly welcome. This programme will complement the planned EC assistance to ACP states for adapting to the changes in production and market conditions for sugar cane (€165m (£115 million) in 2007 funded from the EC budget); and thus enhance sustainability in the sector."

8.9 The EC's Erasmus Mundus programme aims, he says:

"… to promote the European Union as a global centre of excellence in learning, by enhancing the visibility and attractiveness of European higher education in third countries. It supports European Masters Courses and funds scholarships for third-country nationals, as well as scholarships for EU nationals studying in third countries. ACP students can already benefit from the programme, but extra funding will support a further 130 scholarships starting in the 2007/08 academic year. The proposed 'window' for ACP students replicates similar 'windows' created for several Asian countries."

8.10 The UK also welcomes the EC's intention to contribute to the Trust Fund established to support the Africa Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), "which supports African-owned efforts to improve governance. The December 2005 European Council's Conclusions on the EU Strategy for Africa, expressed support for the APRM."

8.11 Finally, he says that following a seminar held in Nairobi in January 2005, attended by representatives from 16 African countries, the EC intends to work with UN-HABITAT on a slum upgrading programme in ACP states. "We welcome this. Funds will support the completion of feasibility studies for developing urban sector profiles in a number of African countries. These profiles will be used to define specific programmes in those countries."

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

8.12 The Minister says that there are no additional costs to the UK "as this proposal would not increase the overall size of the 9th EDF budget".

TIMETABLE

8.13 The Minister says that the proposal is currently under consideration within the ACP Working Group and that, in order for it to be agreed at the ACP-EC Council on 1-2 June, a Council agreement will be required by 31 May. "If this is not possible, the ACP-EC Council may delegate the decision to the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors who meet more regularly."

Conclusion

8.14 This would appear to be a sensible and proportionate re-allocation of resources, which we are bringing to the attention of the House because of the widespread interest in the EU's developmental activities in Africa.

8.15 We now clear the document.





27   The eight goals UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are those that, in 2000, the UN set itself to achieve, most by 2015: eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and develop a partnership for development - each with associated targets and benchmarks to measure progress.  Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 2 June 2006