Select Committee on European Scrutiny Thirty-Eighth Report


5 Aviation

(27734)

11829/06

COM(06) 396

+ ADDs 1-2

Draft Regulation on common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community (recast)

Legal baseArticle 80(2) EC; co-decision; QMV
Document originated18 July 2006
Deposited in Parliament28 July 2006
DepartmentTransport
Basis of considerationEM of 31 August 2006
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared, further information requested

Background

5.1 Three Regulations, Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92, Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 and Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92, collectively known as the Third Aviation Package, set out common rules for the transformation of air transport services in the Community in order to liberalise the market.

The document

5.2 This draft Regulation would recast, that is consolidate and revise, the three 1992 Regulations into one Regulation. The proposal follows a public consultation and an assessment by the Commission (and annexed to the proposal) of the impact of no change to the existing regime or a revision and simplification of the regime, with a series of measures to address the problems identified. The revision cuts across many areas in aviation, including safety and licensing, consumer protection and route development. Its key elements are:

  • operating licences — before being granted an operating licence carriers would be required to demonstrate a greater level of financial robustness than at present in order to protect against airline failures. There would also be tighter restrictions on the leasing of aircraft and crews ("wet leasing") from third countries, which would only be allowed for a shorter period and when certain safety guarantees had been given. This would have a significant impact on the current operating practices of some UK carriers;
  • public service obligations (PSOs) and traffic distribution rules (TDRs) — for PSOs the conditions under which socially-necessary but uncommercial air services, for instance to remote islands, may be subsidised are limited in order to minimise distortions to the single market. TDRs are intended to be used for operational purposes to ensure an appropriate division of traffic between a number of airports serving the same city. A number of Member States have been accused of abusing the PSO procedures to prevent the legitimate commercial operations of low-cost carriers (including EasyJet). Similarly, there is some evidence that TDRs have been used to discriminate against some carriers in some Member States. The draft Regulation would tighten the rules on PSOs and TDRs; and
  • consumer issues — the draft Regulation addresses two issues about which consumer groups (including the UK Air Users' Council) have concerns. First, airlines would be required to quote prices inclusive of all taxes, fees and charges, particularly on websites. Present practice varies and direct comparison between airlines is difficult. Secondly, differential pricing based on country of residence, which can currently lead to different prices being quoted for the same flight depending on the country in which the booking is made, would be stopped. Additionally powers of Member States to regulate air fares would be abolished.

The Government's view

5.3 The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport (Gillian Merron) says that the Government agrees the need to review the operation of the regulatory regime set out in the Third Aviation Package and supports the general aims of further improving the operation of the internal market, ensuring the consistent application and streamlining of the existing rules and improving transparency for consumers. She continues that the general thrust of the draft Regulation is in line with the Government's policy of supporting the development of a fully-liberalised Community aviation market, though the operational effect of some of the proposals (particularly on leasing of aircraft) may be of concern to the aviation industry.

5.4 However, the Minister comments that the Government does have some concerns. It will examine the implications for the air transport industry and to identify the key issues with them before taking a judgement on whether the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Meanwhile she makes some specific points:

  • the Government is concerned that proposed extension from two to three years of the period covered by start-up carriers' business plans will have little effect on the incidence of airline failures —indeed this could result in less realistic business plans and thus be a less stringent requirement than exists at present;
  • the Government is concerned that the proposed tighter controls on the leasing of aircraft in order to address the need to maintain high and consistent levels of aviation safety may, in their current form, have significant financial implications for carriers whose fleets contain a high proportion of leased aircraft. The Department will work closely with the industry to develop a fuller understanding of these implications;
  • the proposals in relation to PSOs are generally welcome, although the Government will need to seek clarification of certain definitions, such as that of a "regional airport", and to ensure that the proposals will actually address misuse of the PSO mechanism;
  • as some UK airlines have been disadvantaged by TDRs elsewhere in Europe the Government welcomes in principle the proposed new powers for the Commission to approve TDRs and designate airport systems, which should lead to better enforcement of this mechanism across the Community;
  • the Government wishes to consider carefully the impact of the provisions on pricing, which seek to address concerns over a lack of consistency in the publication of taxes, fees and charges applicable to air fares, the impact on UK airlines and to ensure that any new regime is workable, proportionate and delivers real consumer benefits; and
  • the Government welcomes the proposal to abolish powers for Member States to regulate air fares and regards such powers as unnecessary in the liberalised market which has been created by the Third Aviation Package.

5.5 The Minister says that the Government is undertaking a full consultation with interested parties to assess in detail the impact and policy implications of these measures. This will involve preparation of a Regulatory Impact Assessment.

Conclusion

5.6 Although the basic framework for the common market in air transport services would remain this draft Regulation would introduce important modifications. Before considering the matter further we should like to see the outcome of the Government's consultations and a Regulatory Impact Assessment. Meanwhile the document is not cleared.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 30 October 2006