Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100-105)

SIR MICHAEL JAY, KCMG, MR RICHARD STAGG, CMG, MR DAVID WARREN AND MR RIC TODD

26 OCTOBER 2005

  Q100  Chairman: Even though you are not the sponsoring department?

  Sir Michael Jay: We would see ourselves as being a stakeholder and having an interest in BBC Monitoring, and in its output.

  Q101  Chairman: How much will you be contributing to it?

  Mr Todd: I think it is £2½ million.

  Q102  Chairman: So the other £2 million, or whatever it is, is coming from where?

  Sir Michael Jay: It is coming from other stakeholders. I do not have the details with me at the moment.

  Q103  Chairman: Could you send us a note?

  Sir Michael Jay: We could send you a note, Mr Chairman, certainly. [11]

  Q104  Andrew Mackinlay: Going back to my penultimate question, I am also told that there are some people who have retired early, not through sickness, but are retired because—and I do not use this in an emotive way—they are no longer wanted or their face does not fit, but terms are reached under which they are paid much higher sums than their service would justify. It is like a package. Could we be told on how many occasions that has happened

in the past, whatever convenient number of years—three years, five years, or whatever? I am not talking about where people go—which I actually have reservations about throughout the public sector—but where there has been a payment which is higher than what they should have got. This is people below retirement age.

  Mr Warren: We shall send the Committee a note in reply to Mr Mackinlay's question, but I would make the point that all early retirement or early severance agreements that are reached with staff—and we have reached a number recently, as part of the downsizing of the Foreign Office—are reached in terms of the framework that the Cabinet Office imposes on all departments. So there is no question of our being able to offer any different terms.

  Q105  Andrew Mackinlay: Indeed. So that if my information is incorrect, there should be no people who have had more advantageous terms than those which they are entitled to.

  Mr Warren: Indeed.

  Andrew Mackinlay: But it has been put to me that that has happened on some occasions, and no doubt you would write to me and say, "Mackinlay, your information is wrong again". It will not be the first time I have been humiliated but, on the other hand, just remember that sometimes, on some occasions, I am right!

  Chairman: At that point, can we thank you, Sir Michael, for your and your colleagues' time with us? It has been a long session. We are very grateful, and no doubt we will be communicating with you in future. Thank you, gentlemen, for coming today.





11   Ev 50 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 March 2006