Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


OVERSEAS POSTS AND FCO ESTATE  

Written evidence submitted by Thomas Rambaut

GOVERNMENT SHUTS EMBASSY AND CUTS AID TO MADAGASCAR

  I am writing to you in the hope that you can influence a situation which needs to be urgently put right. I know that for the moment there is no Committee but that one is expected shortly. However could you please assist with your influence in putting right a wrong that seems totally unnecessary.

  I recently returned from a visit to Madagascar—a country of enormous potential, but one of the poorest on earth—due mainly to a succession of bad and corrupt governments over the past 30 years. I can confirm from my own observations that the level of poverty, malnutrition and misery are every bit as bad as indicated.

  Since 2002 Madagascar has been governed by a new breed of leaders; who have the interests of the people at heart, and who are determined to beat corruption and bring prosperity to the people of Madagascar. There is now a mood of hope which has not been felt for two generations, and to which aid donors and the international community have responded with generous financial and technical assistance to help rebuild the country's shattered infrastructure. The British Embassy has become the most visible diplomatic presence. The Americans are bunkered down and the French have a long and awkward history to forget. The British presence is noted and spoken about very well, in even the remotest parts of Madagascar where television reaches. This was all noted and praised in a report by an FCO man called James Bevan.

  Against this background I was astonished to discover that the government has decided to close the British Embassy in Antananarivo later this year—to save pounds sterling 300,000 a year. Furthermore, when the Embassy closes a fund used to finance the construction of schools, equip medical centres and projects which provide regular incomes to poor communities will also come to an end. This cannot be right. The British government claims to be determined to reduce poverty and suffering in Africa. But closing the British Embassy and ending British aid will have precisely the opposite effect.

  After only three years the government of Madagascar has achieved a great deal. It is one of Africa's few success stories, and it is already showing the way to other developing countries. To withdraw British support at this time makes no sense at all. It is damaging to the interests of Britain and Madagascar and could undermine the government's efforts. Furthermore it contradicts everything that Mr Blair and Mr Brown have said, particularly in the context of the recent Commission for Africa report.

  I understand that several large British investments in Madagascar have recently been announced or are expected to be announced. The British Embassy has been in the forefront of facilitating these. I know that it is common amongst a very few staff of the FCO to say that they are not interested in British investment overseas, only in generating British exports or investment into Britain. I am sure that you are aware that most of the largest investments overseas also arrange huge procurement in the UK. When Companies such as Rio Tinto and BAT wish to invest in Madagascar you must expect substantial exports from Britain to sustain these companies' operations. It is also my understanding that these same companies want to help pay for the operation of the Embassy because they find it so helpful and useful in their endeavours. So the savings can be made by other means. The FCO ignores this offer.

  I also understand that there are dozens of local staff in the Embassy and residences, most of whom, because of the extreme poverty, will never work again. There are opportunities not to break up this staff and to pass the buildings and staff to another country. Your staff in London have vetoed this. This would seem a vile way to treat loyal staff and, those who propose it, deserve to rot in the same kind of poverty. It is also totally against the policies and declared intentions of the FCO.

  It is fairly clear what has happened. In spite of the glowing report by Mr Bevan,the FCO has decided to make an economy by shutting this embassy, without thinking, analysing or listening. Once someone had made the decision and his error became apparent to him, all he could do was to bring forward the closure to stop the protests. Jack Straw does not know the truth about this and Gordon Brown and Tony Blair would surely be surprised by the cavalier way in which this person has done his best to bring misery to dozens of British employees, a disservice to British industry, incomprehension to a very friendly government and a stab in the back to those who are trying to bring aid to this, one of the poorest countries in the World.

  You know two f***s from Bob Geldorf and the culpable manager would be well in the S***. Could the FCO not quietly put this right before the Gleneagles Conference and save themselves from looking asinine? The FCO have made a serious mistake in deciding to close the British Embassy in Antananarivo. It should be big enough to admit it and reverse this decision before it is too late. I hope you will use your influence to ensure that British support for Madagascar continues, for the benefit of the people of Madagascar to end the poverty and suffering they have endured for so long.

Thomas Rambaut

22 June 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 March 2006