Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20-21)

PROFESSOR PAUL WILKINSON AND MR PETER TAYLOR

19 OCTOBER 2005

  Q20  Mr Horam: Is that fully accepted by the Wahhabi leaders?

  Professor Wilkinson: Yes, that is right. They see this as a group which is criminal in nature, that has to be crushed because it is a threat to the regime, it is a threat to their economy as they see it, and a threat of course to Saudi relations with the United States and with the Western world generally. So the Saudi regime and many of the rising prosperous class of professionals in Saudi society clearly recognise that they have a stake in showing success in beating off the efforts of al Qaeda.

  Q21  Mr Horam: So is it a diminishing recruiting ground for al Qaeda?

  Professor Wilkinson: I think that under King Abdullah it is true to say that it will continue to be a diminishing recruiting ground because King Abdullah is a popular figure; he is particularly popular in the conservative religious circles of Wahhabism, which is the dominant religious belief system in the country, and provided the government continues to try to meet the needs of the people in economic terms and to reform, which they have promised to do, the political and economic system, I see no reason to regard Saudi as the most vulnerable of all the states in the Middle East. One could argue, tragically, that Pakistan, with its terrible problems, particularly those made much greater by the dreadful earthquake, is more vulnerable in many ways because there is a core of support for al Qaeda among some of its population, particularly up in the north-west frontier area, but some also in the big cities, and President Musharraf is so much the core of the policy of support for the Western coalition that if al Qaeda succeeded in one of their attempts to assassinate him—and they have tried several times already—I think that would have the most damaging consequences for the stability of Pakistan. Pakistan I think is very vulnerable. Let us not forget that Afghanistan is also still vulnerable because, despite all our efforts there, despite the fact that we have troops deployed there, the Taliban, with al Qaeda under its wing, and in alliance with some war lords, is creeping back into positions of influence in some of the provinces, and that is a worrying development. It would be tragic if we allowed the situation that prevailed prior to 2001 to emerge by a process of drift. I hope that we can continue to give substantial support to President Karzai, who is very courageous, who is trying to make democracy work in that benighted country. We really need to do more for him, and if we are able to find—and I agree with Peter; it is going to be difficult—an honourable and safe way of reducing our military commitments in Iraq, I hope we switch some of that effort to the very desperate needs of helping security in Afghanistan.

  Chairman: Thank you very much. I am afraid we have run out of time. We have another witness waiting patiently and we have to move on. Thank you, gentlemen, very much. It has been extremely informative. No doubt if we have any other thoughts we may be writing to you both with further inquiries on aspects of answers you gave and information that we might require. Thank you for coming and thank you for giving us so much information.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 2 July 2006