Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Letter to the Chairman of the Committee from the Minister of State for Europe, Foreign and Commonwealth Office

  I am writing to let you know about a decision the FCO has recently taken to phase out grant-in-aid funding for the British Association for Central and Eastern Europe (BACEE). In view of the current debate surrounding the future of enlargement I felt it important to set out the reasons for our decision, and to reassure the members of your Committee that it in no way represents any diminishing of our support for the enlargement process.

  BACEE is a Non-Departmental Public Body (NDPB) chaired by Lord Radice. Two FAC members—Gisela Stuart and Paul Keetch—are also members of BACEE's board. BACEE was established in 1967 to promote democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Central and Eastern Europe, and its project activities have helped to underpin the remarkable reforms that we have witnessed in the region in recent years. In recent years their focus has shifted towards the Balkans and the enlarged EU's Eastern neighbours. Grant-in-aid in the current financial year is £267,440.

  NDPBs have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, reflecting government policy to keep their numbers to a minimum. There are two criteria for determining whether or not the status is justified: that there is a clear continuing need for their work, and that an NDPB can be shown to be the best way of carrying out that work.

  BACEE clearly meets the first criterion: there is a continuing need for project work to support HMG objectives in the EU candidate countries, Western Balkans and Eastern neighbours. The growth in FCO programme funds directed at this region illustrates this. But BACEE no longer meets the second criterion. Now that relationships with the target countries have been normalised it is much easier for our Embassies to operate directly to promote stability and democracy. Similarly, there is now a plethora of organisations which can implement projects on the FCO's behalf: NGOs, Other Government Departments and agencies, universities, trades unions and consultancies. Increasingly we are working directly through indigenous NGOs or through organisations in new member states, who are eager to share their experience of reform and integration with EU norms. All of these offer good, cost-effective channels for the FCO to pursue its objectives.

  BACEE have been aware for some time now that the climate surrounding their future has been uncertain. In a letter to the Chairman in December 2002 the Foreign Secretaty made clear that no guarantees could be made about future levels of funding and a review of BACEE in summer 2004 noted that in retaining its grant-in-aid BACEE was swimming against the tide. There is already one precedent: the Britain-Russia Centre/British East-West Centre lost its NDPB status two years ago. Other FCO-sponsored NDPBs are also under regular review.

  The FCO proposes to phase out BACEE's grant-in-aid funding gradually over the next two financial years. We hope this will allow BACEE sufficient time to consider its position and make any necessary arrangements to handle the transition to independent status, if that is what its board and membership chooses.

  It is important to underline that this decision in no way represents any lessening of the Government's commitment to the enlargement process. We remain among the foremost proponents of further enlargement, which we see as the EU's most successful foreign policy tool. Aspirant countries are well aware of our support which is evidenced on both a political and a practical level, including our emphasis on the issue during our Presidency, increased levels of programme funding and a redoubling of our efforts on twinning. We believe that a gradual, planned transition for BACEE from government sponsorship is compatible with our overall stance. We stand ready to assist BACEE in explaining the move to its stakeholders, including in the beneficiary countries.

  FCO officials are already closely involved in explaining the decision to BACEE's staff, board and membership and will do all they can to facilitate discussion on BACEE's future and to handle the practical implications of the move away from NDPB status. Should members of your Committee require any further information or clarification I will be glad to oblige.

Douglas Alexander MP

Minister of State for Europe

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

30 September 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 July 2006