Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Written evidence submitted by Catherine R Schenk, Professor of International Economic History, University of Glasgow

CHINA'S INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS

HONG KONG SAR-MAINLAND CHINA RELATIONS

  It is now commonly understood that the international economy has been and will continue to be profoundly affected by the economic development of the People's Republic of China. This will pose challenges and opportunities both globally and for the United Kingdom. This brief will set out the key features of China's international economic relations and then present some key issues that should be considered in anticipating future policy. At the end of the brief is a section on Hong Kong SAR's changing economic and political relations with Mainland China.

  China's economic growth has been driven by high levels of capital accumulation, both from domestic investment and also from foreign investment. In 2003 the IMF identified potential over-heating of the economy and recommended policies to reduce the growth rate of capital accumulation to prevent bottlenecks (by slowing monetary growth, bank lending, reigning in the property sector). These appeared to have been somewhat successful in the first half of 2005 but there was a further acceleration in the second half of the year. Growth is predicted to have been about 9.3% in 2005 according to the World Bank in November 2005, and 9.8% according to the latest Chinese official estimate in January 2006.

  Over the past few years, China has vied with the USA to be the largest single recipient of foreign direct investment. In 2005 inward FDI amounted to US$60.3 billion, a slight fall of 0.5% from 2004. The table below shows that the UK is not a major investor in China, although there may be some indirect investment from the UK to China through Hong Kong SAR that is not captured in this data. Even within the EU, the UK falls behind Germany as a direct source of investment. The value of contracted FDI increased by over 6% in 2004, which is an indication of the potential growth in realized flows in the future.

SOURCES OF FDI INFLOWS TO MAINLAND CHINA
Shared of total Realized Value of FDI in China (%) 2004Jan-Oct 2005
UK1.31
1.60EU Total
6.998.61
USA6.505.07
East Asia61.47
58.58

Data from China's Ministry of Commerce (www.fdi.gov.cn)






  China's competitiveness in export of labour intensive production has already generated considerable trade friction with the USA and the EU. In 2005 the USA trade deficit with China grew 45% and the USA launched 11 antidumping investigations against China.

  The impact of new trade restrictions is complicated by the large number of foreign companies engaged in production for export in China, who will suffer from trade barriers.

  In the first 11 months of 2005, 58% of China's exports were produced by Foreign Invested Enterprises. In 2003 ½ of exports from FIEs went to the USA. While China has a huge bilateral surplus with the USA, its overall trade is more balanced. China tends to run large surpluses with the USA and EU, which are partly offset by deficits with Taiwan, Korea, Japan and ASEAN countries. In 2005, total exports grew 28% while imports grew only 18%, generating a trade surplus of $US102 billion. The EU is China's biggest trading partner (imports and exports amounted to US$217 billion p 22.6% in 2005). The USA comes a close second with US$212 billion in exports plus imports. Japan is in third place with US$184 billion. Chinese exports will continue to diversify away from labour intensive products. In January 2006 Geely International exhibited the first Chinese-made car at the Detroit auto-show.

  Another Chinese car manufacturer, Chery, plans to begin exports to the USA at the end of 2007.

  A further aspect of China's growing surplus has been the accumulation of huge foreign exchange reserves, much of which is denominated in US government debt. In 2005 foreign exchange reserves increased by US$208.9 billion or 34%. This gives the PRC some degree of leverage over the USA. Should China cease to acquire US Treasury Bills and other US debt or seek to diversify its portfolio of assets, this would impinge the ability of the US government to fund its deficits and on the exchange rate of the US$, which has already fallen substantially in international markets over the last two years.

Prospects for the future include:

  1.  China's outward foreign investment: the growing shortage of key resources threatens to create a bottle-neck in China's industrial development. The World Bank reported that in 2004, China accounted for half of global growth in the demand for metals, and one-third of the global growth in demand for oil. In 2005 China imported 130 million tons of crude oil, the cost of which increased 18% over 2004. The PRC has begun to address this through outward foreign direct investment in developing countries to capture control of the exploitation and supply of key resources. China has plans to invest US$1 billion in a refinery in Khartoum, has loaned US$2 billion to Angola in return for oil and is building a pipeline through Kazakhstan.

  China has also begun outward FDI in manufacturing—eg Lenovo's purchase of IBM's PC manufacturing. This trend will continue and there are indications that China, along with other countries, is seeking to take advantage of the geographical expansion of the EU. In December 2005 a major Chinese TV manufacturer announced a US$30 million investment in the Czech Republic for R&D, manufacturing and European marketing. In 2005 overseas investment in USA, Europe, Africa, Asia and Oceania increased by 80%. Most of the investment was destined for the Asian region.

  2.  The huge foreign exchange reserves of the PRC provide considerable scope for development loans as well as FDI. In January 2006, for example, the government announced it had agreed a US$20m 9 year loan to Uzbekistan for its economic development. This may have important political implications should China hope to develop spheres of influence in developing economies, particularly those with poor human rights records such as Zimbabwe (China invested US$600 million in 2004) and Sudan (where China has large investments in oil production and infrastructure). It is already reported that China's threat to veto a harsh UN resolution against Sudan led to a watering down of that resolution. The potential for China to increase their political influence by giving aid and loans to countries with poor human rights records is amplified by the recent decision of the British government to curtail aid to Ethiopia on political grounds.

  3.  China's economic growth has been accompanied by worsening inequalities in the geographic distribution of income. This has generated a flow of migrants from rural and poorer provinces to the main cities, not all of whom have been able to find employment.

  In 2005 the government's statistics showed that the poorest 10% of families own less than 2% of residents' assets, while top 10% of families own over 40% of total assets. The widening gap between rich and poor is being addressed by the government through devoting resources to developing the Western provinces and rural enterprise, but it remains a threat to social and therefore political stability. The 11th Five Year Plan (adopted November 2005) puts more emphasis on income distribution, social security and rural development with the slogan "common prosperity".

  4.  On 21 July 2005 the PRC moved from an effective pegged rate against the US$ to a more flexible link to a basket of currencies. This move was widely seen as a response to intense international pressure from the USA, the G10 and IMF to revalue the RMB in order to reduce the competitiveness of Chinese exports. After an initial 2% revaluation of the RMB in July 2005, the rate has remained steady (rising about 0.5% by December 2005) leading to some disappointment and mounting pressure again for greater flexibility. There is no consensus among economists as to the extent to which the RMB has been undervalued.

  It is not likely that a revaluation of the RMB will be the main route through which the Chinese surplus will be addressed (the price competitiveness of Chinese production is so great that even a 10% or 20% revaluation could make little difference). Adjustment will require increasing domestic Chinese demand for imports and for domestic production, increasing protection of intellectual property to encourage exports of IP-rich products from the US and EU, and restructuring declining uncompetitive industries in the US and EU.

  5.  Financial stability—the Chinese banking system continues to be burdened with non-performing loans, mainly to state-owned enterprises. These are being dealt with through Asset Management Companies, which buy the bad debt from the banks to improve their balance sheets. Foreign participation in Chinese banks has accelerated the last year but this may not directly help the problem.

  Foreign bank participation is restricted to minority interest and is mainly aimed at developing the local credit-card and retail market. The impact on governance of the banks is not clear. On the other hand, Chinese banks may suffer from increased competition as foreign banks widen their operations in China under the WTO requirements.

  6.  If the EU and UN confrontation with Iran continues to escalate, this may draw China into international political conflict. They are unlikely to support sanctions against Iran. In December 2005 the USA announced sanctions against six Chinese companies accused of supplying military equipment and technology to Iran. In 2004 the Chinese state oil company, SINOPEC, signed a 25-year oil supply agreement with Iran, reportedly worth US$70 billion.

HONG KONG'S RELATIONS WITH CHINA

  After the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 and the global economic downturn of 2001-02 combined with the SARS crisis, Hong Kong went into a recession that included rising unemployment and falling prices. The Hong Kong economy is particularly vulnerable to shocks to asset prices (property and shares) which made the recovery difficult. From 2001-03 the changing fortunes of Hong Kong SAR vis a vis Mainland China have transformed both their economic and political relationships.

  Economically it is much more evident now that Hong Kong's economic future lies through further integration with the booming mainland economy and, indeed, that prosperity in Hong Kong is dependent on this relationship. This is evident in the negotiation in 2003 of the Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) whereby Hong Kong producers gain tariff-free access to the China market for 1370 products and 23 services. The impact of CEPA has been limited since most Hong Kong trade with China is re-exports. However, Hong Kong's retail and service sector is benefiting from the dramatic increase in the flow of tourists from the Mainland after the liberalisation of travel restrictions. In 2004 12 million mainland tourists visited Hong Kong, accounting for 56% of total tourist arrivals.

  Beijing has recently interfered with the progress to democracy in Hong Kong, provoking public protests culminating in a mass protest march in December 2005. In April 2004 the National People's Council in Beijing decreed that Hong Kong would not move forward to full democracy at the pace suggested by the Basic Law, which set a time frame for reform to begin in 2007. At the beginning of December 2005 tens of thousands of Hong Kong residents protested against the Executive's proposal to make limited reforms to increase participation in the election of the Chief Executive slightly and to increase the number of legislators, with no commitment for a timetable to full universal suffrage and direct elections.

  The protests were successful in defeating this legislation on 21 December 2005, but it is not yet clear what will replace it.

Hong Kong's Total Trade with Mainland China (Imports+Exports)
HK$ billionChina Total Trade with China as a Share of total trade%
20001,2583,231 38.9
20011,2283,049 40.3
20021,3303,180 41.8
20031,5283,548 43.1
20041,8074,130 43.8
20051,8824,186 45.0

2005 data for January to November only.

Catherine R Schenk

University of Glasgow

20 January 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 13 August 2006