Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


148. Memorandum submitted by the Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians

  The Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (UCATT) represents 125,000 members employed in the construction industry throughout the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.

  There are 2.2 million people working in the construction industry.

  The construction industry currently accounts for approximately 9% of GDP.

  UCATT have long campaigned for safe sites and have consistently raised the issue of the disproportionate high level of fatalities, injuries and ill health, which affects construction workers.

  Since the beginning of April 2005 there have been 37 fatalities amongst construction workers—an increase of at least three on the same period last year (2004).

  This additional evidence to the Home Affairs Committee is focussed on highlighting the lessons that can be learnt from the Hatfield Rail Crash judgement and specifically the failure to obtain a successful prosecution of any individuals as an aid to determining what provisions should be included in the final legislation.

  1.  The Hatfield rail crash in October 2000 caused four deaths and more than one hundred injuries. The crash was caused when a rail shattered while a London to Leeds express train was travelling over it at 115 mph. The rail that caused the derailment had been identified 21 months before the disaster as suffering from a form of metal fatigue commonly found where the track curves.

  2.  Balfour Beatty were the contractors responsible for track maintenance but their maintenance had been totally inadequate for months. This was something that Balfour Beatty and Railtrack were fully aware of.

  3.  Railtrack were the privatised infrastructure company that owned the track but they appeared to be unable to cope with the volume of maintenance work that was needed and this led to a backlog of repair work. There have been allegations that Railtrack was run by accountants and not engineers. In 1999 the railway Safety Statistics Bulletin reported that there was an alarming increase in the number of broken rails. Railtrack had forecast 600 in 1998-99 but the actual number of breakages was 937.

  4.  The CPS brought charges of corporate manslaughter against Balfour Beatty, manslaughter charges against five employees of Balfour Beatty and Railtrack and health and safety offences. During the course of the seven-month trial at the Old Bailey, which concluded this month, Mr Justice Mackay dismissed corporate manslaughter charges against Balfour Beatty in July and the five employees were cleared of the charges against them this month. Network Rail (the successor of Railtrack) and Balfour Beatty have been found guilty of health and safety offences and will be sentenced on 3 October. There is no provision for any penalty other than a fine under the current legislation.

  5.  This case has provided clear evidence that the current law is failing workers and members of the public alike. Mr Justice Mackay made it clear that he was left with no alternative but to dismiss the charges of corporate manslaughter and said "This case continues to underline a long and pressing need for the long-delayed reform of the law in this area of unlawful killing." Yet the legislation as it is currently drafted is only expected to result in an additional five prosecutions each year.

  6.  Balfour Beatty admitted it had breached safety standards but only after it had been cleared of corporate manslaughter. Network Rail continued to deny any breach of health and safety laws but has now been found guilty.

  7.  The failure to bring successful corporate or manslaughter prosecutions against the companies or individual senior managers, in this case, underlines the failure of the current law and yet the draft legislation that is being considered will do little or nothing to change this situation.

  8.  UCATT reiterates the recommendations it made in its earlier submission, namely:

    —  It is not enough to simply target companies and some Crown bodies. The Bill should include individual liability which can be achieved by:

      (a)  Introducing legally binding health and safety duties on company Directors and their Crown body equivalents

      (b)  Allowing individuals to be prosecuted for, and convicted of, aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the offence of corporate manslaughter. However, UCATT repeat our assertion that it should only be senior managers to which this should apply.

    —  The Bill should be amended so that work-related fatalities caused by every level of management are admissible for use in the consideration of corporate liability for manslaughter. In terms of the multiple sub-contracting that takes place on construction sites then this should reflect the practice that decisions about the overall standards on the site lie with the principal contractor and it is they who should be held accountable whether or not they actually employ any staff. This should not prevent senior managers of sub-contractors being held accountable in addition to the principal contractor.

    —  The "profit from failure" test must be removed from the Draft Bill.

    —  The "public policy" test must be removed from the Draft Bill.

    —  Crown Immunity must be removed for health and safety offences.

    —  The Draft Bill must be amended so that all employing organisations come within its scope. This will require:

      (a)  Crown and Parliamentary immunity to be removed in such a way so that it ensures that all Crown bodies, including Parliament, government departments, government agencies, the prison service, regulatory agencies and the civil service are liable to prosecution for the offence of manslaughter; and

      (b)  The extension of liability for the offence of manslaughter to unincorporated bodies.

    —  The scope of the Draft Bill must be widened so that companies that cause deaths abroad are liable to prosecution for corporate manslaughter.

    —  In order to encourage proactive health and safety management, provide a credible deterrent against negligence and deliver justice for victims, an innovative range of penalties, including custodial sentences, must supplement the fines system proposed.

    —  The pre-legislative scrutiny of the Draft Bill must begin as a matter of urgency and a final Corporate Manslaughter Bill should be introduced into parliament at the very earliest opportunity.

  9. This quote from Maureen Kavanagh who runs the Safe Trains Action Group and reported in the Independent on 7 September 2005, articulates the spirit of what UCATT believes this legislation should achieve—"It is not about holding up people as scapegoats, it is about people doing the job they are supposed to do, having a duty of care and being accountable".





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 October 2005