Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


151. Memorandum submitted by the British Air Line Pilots Association

INTRODUCTION

  British Air Line Pilots Association (BALPA) is an independent trade union and professional association representing some 8,000 members, all of whom are employed in a safety critical capacity as flight deck crew in large and small airlines, helicopter companies and training schools.

  BALPA represents members industrially, with their employers and with the regulator (CAA) on flight safety issues and in accident investigation.

  BALPA welcomes the publication of "Corporate Manslaughter—The Government Draft Bill for Reform" and the opportunity to respond to the paper and draft Bill.

AVIATION ACCIDENT STATISTICS 1992-2001

  Our analysis of the accident data derived from the CAA database indicates the following:

    UK Airlines (Passenger) Aeroplanes 5,700 kg MTWA (max take off weight authorised)

    No fatal accidents

133 reportable incidents with

15 serious injuries

    UK Airlines (Cargo) Aeroplanes >5,700 kg MTWA

4 fatal accidents

18 reportable accidents with

6 fatalities and 2 serious injuries

    UK Airline <5,700 kg MTWA

4 fatal accidents—6 crew and 16 passenger fatalities

11 reportable accidents and 5 serious injuries

    UK Public Transport Helicopters

2 fatal accidents—2 crew and 14 passengers

20 reportable accidents and 5 serious injuries

    UK Police, Ambulance and Search & Rescue Services

3 fatal accidents—9 fatalities and 2 serious injuries

15 reportable accidents

    UK Non Public Transport Aircraft >5,700 kg MTWA

7 fatal accidents—11 crew fatalities

21 reportable accidents

    UK Non Public Transport Aeroplanes <5,700 MTWA

118 fatal accidents

1,820 reportable accidents—190 fatalities and

117 serious injuries

    UK Non Public Transport Helicopters <5,700 kg MTWA

30 fatal accidents

219 reportable accidents—56 fatalities, 27 serious injuries

  Without going into the specifics of any case we do know, from litigation on behalf of bereaved families, that management failure lay at the heart of some of the above accidents.

  In an industry where safety is absolutely critical to ensure the well being of flight crew, passengers and public, BALPA welcomes the new offence that targets serious failings in the strategic management of a company's activities that have resulted in death.

  Some of the accidents and fatalities listed above may have been avoided with greater care over acts, or omission to act. It is important that responsibility for management failure not only applies to the corporate body but also to owners, directors and the senior managers who are ultimately responsible for the management failure.

  The term "senior manager" should not allow responsibility to be passed to front line employees or middle managers.

THE CROWN

Immunity of the Armed Forces while training for combat

  In the case of the Army, its combat training is carried out away from the public; we do not see tanks at high speed down our high streets or see infantry carrying out bayonet charges in local parks. Therefore, combat training immunity for the Army is unlikely to affect the public. However, military aircraft do use "public airspace" for combat training (eg low flying over the Lake District not in Danger Areas, and in other airspace in transit to/from Danger Areas) and it could be argued that almost all military flying is training for combat, including that carried out in "public airspace". We would not like to see military aviation using a blanket defence of "combat training" in any possible corporate manslaughter situation. Although we have used an analogy with the Army, we do not comment on the Royal Navy's combat training, save to say that some of these can be said to be carried out in "public waters'. In summary, we would like to see the combat training immunity addressed in more detail to avoid future defence claims of blanket immunity.

UNINCORPORATED BODIES

  When applying for a Type A licence to fly an aircraft (20 seats or more) or a Type B licence (19 seats or less) there is no legal requirement for the applicant to be a corporate body, in fact the holders of some Type B licences are sole traders. Either the law needs to be extended to include unincorporated bodies or the rules on licensing need to change so that only incorporated bodies are granted licenses. It can also be seen by the above statistics that the Police, ambulance and search and rescue air services should not be outside the scope of the offence.

CAUSATION

  Paragraph 49 opens with the statement that: ". . . the management failure must have caused the victim's death." Consider two scenarios: in the first, the management failure, gross negligence, disregard for risk to life etc causes the victim's death. The Draft Bill addresses this scenario. In the second scenario, the management exhibits exactly the same behaviour and attitudes, but due to other fortuitous circumstances, such as extraordinary medical skill or plain good luck, the victim does not die. Although outwith the terms of this Bill, we believe that the culpability of the management should be the same or very similar in the two scenarios. An analogy here is that attempted murder is about as serious as murder itself, because the defendant's intention and attitude is the same in both cases. It is accepted that "attempted manslaughter" is an oxymoron but we submit that management failings and gross negligence in this scenario should be addressed, although possibly elsewhere.

EXTENT

  Some foreign registered airlines have their largest base in the UK, it would be iniquitous if they were allowed to be outside the scope of this legislation.

SANCTIONS

  We agree that fining the Crown would serve little practical purpose, provided that the Crown is fully subject to the court-imposed remedial orders advocated in "Sanctions". However, public perception might be dissatisfied with the Crown "getting away with" non-payment of a heavy fine that would be imposed if a non-Crown body was in the dock. Something might need to be done to allay public concern in this area.

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION

  When we read this paragraph we were concerned that it appeared not to apply to aircraft away from the UK but we then saw in clause16 of the draft Bill that it does so apply; we strongly support this inclusion.

SCHEDULE TO THE BILL

  We trust that bodies such as the Met Office are included under their umbrella ministry.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 October 2005