Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


15. Memorandum submitted by Councillor Gordon Graham

  I do not believe that the proposals go far enough in that the new offence would target the liability of organisations themselves and would not apply to individual directors or others. I therefore call for the inclusion of formal duties for all company directors.

  Every worker should be able to expect a safe working environment, the law must change:

    1.  So that directors are clear that they have a duty to take steps to prevent death and injuries.

    2.  As an effective deterrent and as a driver to improved health and safety standards.

WITH REGARD TO PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS

  It is the responsibility of the health and safety executive, local authorities and the procurator fiscal to prosecute organisations and individuals for health and safety offences.

  This responsibility should clearly remain with these bodies, but the possibility for an injured worker or bereaved family to initiate a private prosecution is an important constitutional safeguard against possible allegations of abuse by these prosecution bodies.

  Under the current law, individuals can initiate private prosecutions for health and safety offences—but they first need to obtain the consent of the director of public prosecutions or in Scotland the procurator fiscal. There is no justification for such a requirement.

  The law commission have stated, "the right of prosecution should be unrestricted unless some very good reason for the contrary exists"—and in my view no such reason exists in relation to health and safety offences.

27 May 2005


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 October 2005