Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


68. Memorandum submitted by Bryan Wilson

  I have read and examined the draft proposed Corporate Manslaughter Bill and would make the following comments. The need for a review and a Corporate Manslaughter Bill is long over due, the perceived inability to secure prosecutions against large companiues has done little in the minds of the public to deliver justice. The historic problem of identifying a directing mind has in many cases proven problematic and contributed to the overall failure to deliver justice in the appropriate cases to the victims.

  The proposed bill addresses this problematic area by introducing the new concept of management failure at a senior level within the organisation under investigation. Whilst individuals may still be liable personally for gross negligence manslaughter the organisation employing the individuals may itself be responsible for corporate manslaughter without the identification of the "directing mind" or the guilt of an individual. The proposed bill enhances investigators abilities to impact in those cases that warrant such intervention if there are gross failures in the organisations management structures and practices.

  The issues that I believe may still prove problematic are those of definition of "senior manager" and "significant role" and this may well be subject to case decisions as the law develops in this area.

  The new offence will still require the guiding principles within gross negligence manslaughter to be adhered to namely duty of care and a gross failure that then causes death. The ordinary rules of causation will apply in determining this question.

  Overall my view is that this proposed legislation fills a gap in current legislation which will enhance the investigators abilities to deliver justice to the victim. I believe that such investigation should be jointly conducted between the police and the Health and Safety Executive. However the Police should retain primacy in such investigations.

  The bill and guidance notes are clear and I support fully the proposed bill. Whilst the number of prosecutions emanating from its use may be small they will in all probability be cases that are in the media spotlight. The bill will assist in restoring confidence in our abilities to deliver justice on behalf of victims, victims who were owed a duty of care and through gross negligence by an organisation at the highest levels their death ensued.

  With regard to road death the investigator will now have to consider the issues of corporate manslaughter in relation to the provision of road furniture that may have caused the death of a road user, organisations that are involved in the supply of motorvehicles or parts which it can be shown were a causative link in the death through gross negligence.

  Both crime SIO's and road death IO's will require updating when the bill becomes law to ensure that the staff dealing with road death, work related death or cases of gross negligence manslaughter consider the organisation providing the service to the deceased, employing the deceased, or are connected to the provision of services, with a duty of care, that has been breached by gross negligence and is shown to have been a causative link to the death.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 October 2005