Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


7.  Memorandum submitted by the Fawcett Society

  The Fawcett Society is concerned about the extent to which the proposed changes to probation services will assist women offenders alter their lives in the community and contribute to reducing the number of women sent to prison. The consultation paper does not illustrate how contestabilitv will reduce women's offending. We are worried that, if not carefully thought through, the marketing of probation services wouId make prisons even more attractive for rehabilitating women.

    —  Women offenders' multiple needs require a joined up response from different actors in the community. The Probation Service has in some cases developed successfully partnerships with voluntary organisations to provide resettlement services to offenders. But the introduction of competition might result in service providers becoming more protective and less willing to share knowledge or work together.

    —  Services for women tend to be more expensive than men's services because the women offending population is small; women also need additional support for childcare. Contestability will it provide an incentive for different providers to deliver services to women offenders?

    —  Needs of women will continue to be marginalized in probation services, as there is no diversity champion within NOMS at both policy and delivery points. We hope the organizational development of NOMS will take this into careful consideration. We would also like to see the membership of the proposed probation trusts include women and experts in provision for women offenders.

Mamusa Siyunyi

Policy Officer, Gender and Justice Policy Network

21 November 2005



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 March 2006