Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 580 - 599)

TUESDAY 28 MARCH 2006

MS CHRISTINE LEE, MR ROBERT LEE AND MS XIAO HONG

  Q580  Mr Winnick: No, I am not suggesting anything other than a lot of people—we have just heard evidence—employed are here illegally.

  Mr Lee: I think that in this country, not just Chinese restaurants or takeaways or catering—in general, a lot of sectors are employing illegal staff. If I can quote from my personal experience, during my university days when I worked part-time as a caterer, when I worked part-time in one of the posh areas in London—they were selling turkeys to the Queen—I had loads of illegal colleagues with me, working there.

  Mr Winnick: That is not in dispute, Mr Lee. More people are likely to have a Chinese takeaway—

  Chairman: I am sorry, we are going to have to make some progress. We have another group of witnesses.

  Q581  Chairman: Ms Lee, you have an office. Is it one office in China?

  Ms Lee: Yes, we have one office in China, our headquarters in Birmingham, and we have a branch in London as well.

  Q582  Mr Winnick: How long have you had an office in China?

  Ms Lee: May 2004.

  Q583  Mr Winnick: That would have been unthinkable, would it not, say 30 years ago?

  Ms Lee: Yes, it would be. It took us a lot of time to set it up anyway.

  Q584  Mr Winnick: How many people do you employ in your office in China?

  Ms Lee: Five.

  Q585  Mr Winnick: Their responsibility is obviously to give as much advice as possible about the legal way of coming to the United Kingdom.

  Ms Lee: Yes, entry clearance. We work very closely with the British Embassy. We are in the British Embassy building. They are on the second floor; we are on the seventeenth floor. So every time the British Embassy has a problem, they send the people up to us and we can explain to them in Chinese what is going on there.

  Q586  Mr Winnick: What do you see as the main administrative or legal problems in China for those people who want to come to the United Kingdom legally?

  Ms Lee: First of all, we deal with the business immigration. We do a lot of business investors. We do a lot of £1 million investors, and we do a lot of work permits; but anything else—we just concentrate on business immigration, more than the ones that you are talking about. People know that to come over here they have to have money or skill. Therefore, a lot of people only come to our China office if they have the money or they have the skill. Anybody else, we will not be able to help as far as the Chinese—

  Q587  Mr Winnick: And your colleagues in China make that perfectly clear, do they?

  Ms Lee: Yes, everybody knows.

  Q588  Mr Winnick: That, without money or skills, it is pointless trying to come?

  Ms Lee: Yes. It is not what we wanted to do but that is how entry clearance officers see it. If you are unemployed or if you have low skill or if you have no money, and you have absolutely nothing, then they will not entertain you anyway. Therefore, we are very particular that the person who is actually coming here is either skilful or they have money. Therefore, we concentrate on business investors, as well as entry clearance and work permit purposes. Obviously, business visitors come over as well and we help them also—as far as family, independents—but we do not deal with any asylum seekers whatsoever. In my 17 years as an immigration lawyer, I have never touched that side of it.

  Q589  Mr Winnick: As far as money is concerned, in English terms how much would be the minimum which one would expect the British immigration authorities to expect a person to have?

  Ms Lee: Do you mean a chef?

  Q590  Mr Winnick: No, you said skills or money. In British currency, how much would be the sort of sum we are talking about?

  Ms Lee: Are you talking about the tier system? Each category is very different.

  Q591  Chairman: For business is a minimum of £200,000, is it not?

  Ms Lee: That is right. The business investment is £200,000. They have to employ two people in the UK. A £1 million investor has to have £750,000 in this country and with £250,000 they have to buy a property in this country. The £750,000 has to be in UK bonds and UK trusts. We are sending these people over at the moment. We are working with the Trade Department of the British Embassy on the second and fifth floors.

  Q592  Mr Winnick: Your client on your left is here on what basis?

  Ms Lee: She is an employee. The employer is at the back, and she came over as a manager—as a Chinese manager working in the Chinese restaurant. Because, in the Chinese environment, she needs to know the Chinese food and be able to communicate with the Chinese chefs as well as the restaurant floor. She came over on the . . . Do you want to ask her?

  Q593  Mr Winnick: I was going to ask, how long has she been in Britain?

  Ms Lee: (Interpreting) 13 October 2004.

  Q594  Mr Winnick: Could you ask her, because you are doing the interpreting, what difficulties if any she had in coming to Britain legally? How did she apply, and the rest of it?

  Ms Lee: First of all, we applied for the work permit for her. As soon as we got the work permit, the employer gave her the work permit and asked her to apply for the entry clearance in her region. She put in the entry clearance in her region and she got refused, because the ECO—entry clearance officer—phoned the hotel that she worked in. They said that they did not know this person, and that is because it was new management. She left the place. That is why she can take up the job in the UK, but the ECO did not want to know that. As soon as they found out that she was not working there, or nobody knew her—the reception who was answering the phone did not know her—that is it. As far as they are concerned, she was not genuine. We had to go to court, and the court determination was that she was a genuine restaurant manager. So she was able to come back here.

  Q595  Mr Winnick: Obviously the Immigration Court in the United Kingdom?

  Ms Lee: Yes.

  Q596  Mr Winnick: You represented Ms Hong—

  Ms Lee: Yes, we represented the employer.

  Q597  Mr Winnick: —at the appeal hearing, and the Home Office lost the case?

  Ms Lee: The Home Office lose 90% of their cases, as far as we are concerned, on the entry clearance front.

  Q598  Mr Winnick: The cases that you represent from China—90% are won by you?

  Ms Lee: Yes. Only our office; I cannot say about anybody else. It is 90% are won by us, yes.

  Q599  Mr Winnick: You must be quite a nightmare for the immigration authorities!

  Ms Lee: You would be surprised. If you talk to a lot of other lawyers, they will tell you exactly the same.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 July 2006