Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by the Cambridge Institute for Research Education and Management (WP 19)

  I am pleased to submit this self contained memorandum of evidence (by Email) to the Health Select Committee. Cambridge Institute for Research Education and Management (CiREM) consider that the Inquiry is critical in the light of significant changes to service provision and the resultant impact on the skills of the workforce.

  CiREM has undertaken research and evaluation programmes in the health sector over a number of years and provides evidence and analyses which supports improved workforce planning, skills development and workforce productivity in the short, medium and longer term.

  We would be happy to provide further information and data should this be required by the committee.

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  This memorandum primarily addresses one aspect of the Health Committee's terms of reference namely:

How should planning be undertaken?

    —  To what extent should it centralised or decentralised?

    —  How is flexibility to be ensured?

    —  What examples of good practice can be found in England and elsewhere

  Labour market intelligence (LMI) refers to the characteristics (data, information and analysis) of the workforce and their skills, potential workforce (labour pool) and to the future needs of the service (replacement and new demand). Cambridge Institute for Research, Education and Management `s spectrum of analysis spans LMI leadership, strategy, infrastructure, operational functioning and promotion with respect to the health care workforce and related skill demands.

  In order to better understand the LMI needs of the future, a secondary objective is extract the LMI implications from likely changes in the workforce. Thus CiREM will review and comment on:

To what extent can and should the demand be met, for both clinical and managerial staff, by:

    —  changing the roles and improving the skills of existing staff;

    —  better retention;

    —  the recruitment of new staff in England; and

    —  international recruitment.

  Thus whilst the former question looks at the how of workforce planning, inclusion of some aspects of the latter question encompasses the what of workforce data and information.

  1.2  In doing so, it will make reference to what forms of data, information and intelligence (eg the shape and nature of the workforce) it should have in order to support a health service which continues to provide high quality provision as is able to continuously improve. Rather than reference sources in the text, a bibliography has been provided.[22]

  1.3  In presenting a clear, concise and coherent case, this memorandum will also make reference to examples of LMI practice across the sector and beyond England.

  1.4  Cambridge Institute for Research, Education and Management was founded in 2000-01 and is an independent organisation specialising in research and evaluation services to the health sector in general and to the NHS in particular.

  1.5  The company's strengths are in the following key areas:

    Skills

      CIREM undertakes primary and secondary research on skills shortages, skill gaps and latent skill shortages We have experience in skills strategy development, particularly at sector skill council levels. Our clients are at regional and national levels.

    Labour Market Intelligence

      We undertake assessment and summary reports of UK wide labour market intelligence data in the health care fields. We have experience in future "scenario planning" in health care related workforce development.

    Learning Needs Analysis

      We have considerable expertise and experience in devising and analysing an organisation's learning needs. Our work encompasses writing peer reviewed papers, scoping a field of study, analysis and synthesis of data to produce executive summary and full reports. Our client base is at national, regional and SME levels.

    Evaluation

      CIREM specialises in evaluations that are innovative in their methodology or subject matter.

        —  We design evaluation frameworks for organisations and particular programmes.

        —  We conduct meta-evaluations across employment sectors and professional disciplines.

        —  We advise on evaluation practice and policy.

    Research based projects

      CiREM specialises in short term research based project work. We participate and contribute to the project planning components of the research.

2.  BACKGROUND

  2.1  The health sector (ie NHS, independent and voluntary & community) employs nearly two million employees in the UK. It is important to view the health sector as a whole as:

    (i)  policy implications in England are resulting in an expansion of service provider; and

    (ii)  the NHS draws from the same labour pool and thus the sector's interdependence in workforce terms is reinforced. The sector is recognised as having a highly skilled workforce, a diversity of staffing professions and occupations, and high investment in education and training.

  Prior to 1999 workforce planning had relied on a highly centralised structure which reviewed a series on year x year training numbers in the professions (medical and nursing). These numbers were increased or decreased according to central returns of staffing numbers.

  In March 1999 the Health Select Committee recommended a review of how workforce planning was undertaken in the health service. Later, the publication of A health service of all the talents provided recommendations around four key areas:

    —  Greater integration and more flexibility of workforce planning.

    —  Better management ownership, clearer roles and responsibilities within planning.

    —  Improved training, education and regulation.

    —  Better planning for overall staff numbers and career pathways.

  2.2  Workforce Development Confederations (WDCs) were created to plan effectively for all staff groups on a locality basis and to work collaboratively with other organisations so that data and workforce plans could be accrued nationally. In April 2004 WDCs were integrated with Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) to bring together capacity for service and workforce planning within one body.

  SHAs are undergoing review in relation to both scale (the numbers of SHAs in England) and scope (core strategic functions).

  2.3  The NHS Improvement Plan, published in June 2004, set out the way in which the NHS needs to change in order to become truly patient led. These changes are fundamental, they affect the whole system and the way individuals and organisations behave.

  In 2005 Creating a patient led NHS outlined how the improvements in capacity, with increased numbers of staff and reductions in waiting times and improvements in mortality rates, would be matched by changes in the structures of the NHS.

  2.4  Skills gaps and shortages have been met as more staff have joined the NHS year on year. Since 1999 until September 2005 the NHS workforce has grown by approximately 23,000 more doctors, 68,000 more nursing staff and 11,000 Allied Health Professionals. Vacancy rates have fallen steadily as these staff have entered service. Staff are also working shorter hours as the successful implementation of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) in 2004 limited a majority of staff hours to 48 and doctors' hours to a maximum of 58.

International recruitment

  2.5  International recruitment was viewed as a short to medium-term strategy. Since 2005 there has been a steady decrease in volume of international recruitment in all sectors. Increasingly as the year-on-year increases in training emerge, the health service will be more self-reliant on UK trained professionals.

  International recruitment however will be used to target specific strategic areas for example dentists (from Poland) and GPs (from Germany and Spain) into priority locations.

  2.6  The sector does not collect reliable data on inward migration. The Labour Force Survey can do this by proxy using "Organisational institution where qualified" but to date there is no coordinated method or plans for collating this data.

  There is evidence to suggest that this facility would be needed at national at regional levels (especially in London which has seen the majority influx of workers).

  2.7  Department of Health recently published A national framework to support local workforce strategy development. This document supported HR Directors in the NHS and Social Care to integrate their strategy for local staff development. The document covered six main areas:

    —  Capacity and skills.

    —  Working flexibly.

    —  Skills escalator.

    —  Model Employer.

    —  High Impact HR.

    —  Integrated Planning.

  The objective of the document is to help organisations devise simple strategies to create a workforce that is flexible, productive and affordable.

  There is recognition that local organisations need to devise local solutions based upon their service and financial development. However it is clear that the solutions fall short of the more medium and long term workforce planning issues—it assumes that "more of the same" will be required in workforce development.

  2.8  The objective of workforce planning is straightforward: match supply to demand. Workforce planning (in the NHS) has had a somewhat chequered history. There is an oversupply of physiotherapists, a severe shortage of dentists and growing realisation from rapid changing technology in the service, an oversupply of cardiothoracic surgeons.

  Workforce planning (NHS) has tended to overlook the financial implications of simply following a demand model.

  2.9  A wide range of organisations in England share between them various roles and responsibilities. The main ones are listed below.

  Department of Health (DH)—who have a key role in assimilating this information and advice; and taking key decisions. In particular, at a macro level DH seeks to ensure that in aggregate, NHS workforce plans are coherent alongside its financial and service plans. DH also has a central role to play in "steering" the investment of (approximately) £4 billion contained in the "MPET Levy" and issuing guidance and targets to individual SHA's to inform their commissioning/investment plans. In practice this means that a large proportion of SHA resources are already pre-committed, firstly because there are many students who are on programmes which started two or more years ago. Secondly, DH comes to a view as to how many new pre-registration commissions are needed nationally each year for each of the healthcare professions; requiring each SHA to commission their "share" of the overall total.

  Skills for Health—(SfH) was established in April 2002 and licensed as the Sector Skills Council (SSC) for health in May of 2004, a sector that employs some two million people with a mix of highly qualified and unqualified staff over a wide range of work roles and setting. The organisation is funded through the four UK health departments, DFES, the Education Act Regulatory Bodies and the sector, which as a whole spends over £3 billion pounds each year on direct training and development. Skills for Health is licensed as the SSC for health through the Sector Skills Development Agency (SSDA), under the Department for Education and Skills (DFES) Sector Skills Councils has four key goals:

    —  addressing skills gaps and shortages;

    —  improving productivity and performance;

    —  increasing opportunities to boost skills; and

    —  improving learning supply, including apprenticeships, higher education and National Occupational Standards (NOS).

  Strategic Health Authorities—have a co-ordinating role for producing coherent workforce plans (linked to service and financial plans) for all the employers in their area—for commissioning the education and training in support of those plans; and submitting overall workforce and commissioning plans to the Department of Health for approval.

  Individual NHS organisations—required to prepare their own workforce plans.

  Other employers in the sector—(eg Nursing Homes, independent hospitals, voluntary sector organisations) who have the option of working closely with NHS organisations in a particular Strategic Health Authority (SHA) area.

  The Workforce Review Team—who advise the Department of Health as to future workforce number requirements. National Workforce Projects (NWP) who are taking forward a number of innovations in workforce development to support service change.

  Royal Colleges—who offer their own advice to the Department of Health, especially in respect of future requirements for doctors in training and Consultants/GP's that come within the remit of each of the Colleges.

  Other "Advisory Committees" and bodies such as NHS Employers and external organisations.

  2.10  Skills for Health are responsible for the production and implementation of a sector skills agreement for the sector. Stages 1 and 2 of the research process noted that simply planning for "more of the same" will be insufficient to meet the challenges of the next 10 years and beyond.

  There is a recognised need to produce a more flexible workforce rather than to continue to commission workforce education and training along traditional lines. A stage three report Case for Change highlighted the fact that strategic drivers converge in two specific areas namely: the need for a more flexible workforce (a more effective mix of people undertaking wider and different roles) and the role of competences as a currency and framework for addressing skills gaps and their workforce development implications through future planning and commissioning.

  2.11  The need for a more systematic structure for workforce planning is now more widely recognised within the NHS.

  Good (ie up to date, comprehensive, robust) LMI makes a vital contribution by providing the evidence base on numbers and skills, and informing future policy on what intelligence on the future workforce will be required to continue to provide high quality patient care.

  We believe that in the current climate of financial instability, there has never been a greater time at which the tensions between "wants" (more doctors, more nurses) and "needs" (what is required in good clinical care by the patient at the right time) have had to be resolved.

  2.12  The current systems of intelligence and planning has produced sufficient staff with appropriate skills to deliver the volume and service of healthcare, within budget. However, an analysis of the implications of the current policy implications suggests heavily that these systems will not be robust enough to be effective in changing healthcare contexts.

3.  WORKFORCE: KEY CHARACTERISTICS

  3.1  Employment composition by gender and status

    —  Health care is one of the largest sectors, and covers more than two million workers, or around 7% of total employment the UK. Employment growth is expected to be positive over the next 10 years, and employment is anticipated to expand by another 10% over the period 2004 to 2014, representing more than 200,000 extra jobs.

    —  Women dominate the health care workforce: 80% are female, which is second only to care sector.

    —  The high proportion of women in health care is reflected in the high proportion of part-time employment, with almost 45% of workers employed part-time, almost all of which are women.

  3.2  Occupational composition of employment

    —  As would be expected, Associate Professional & Technical Occupations, and Personal Service Occupations dominate the employment structure of health care.

    —  Together these two occupational groups comprise 56% of total employment in the sector in 2004.

    —  Almost 600,000 workers are classified in Associate Professional & Technical Occupations and almost 560,000 in Personal Service Occupations.

  3.3  Expansion demand, replacement demand and total requirement 2004-14

    —  The health sector has a comparatively high replacement demand ratio, and coupled with the forecast expansion in employment, these give the sector a total recruitment requirement for the next 10 years of almost 50% of current employment.

    —  Total requirement is in excess of 60% of current employment levels for Managers & Senior Officials and in Professional Occupations, since these two occupational groups are forecast to grow strongly over the next decade in both levels and shares of total employment in the sector.

    —  In terms of the level of recruitment, total requirement for the sector is forecast to be in excess of one million new workers over the period to 2014.

  3.4  Workforce planning data is currently based on numbers required in each of the already established healthcare professions and workforce groups Very little data on the large proportion of the workforce not qualified as registered healthcare professionals.

  3.5  Growth in knowledge and technology means that existing, new and changing job roles do not conveniently fit into the workforce group "profession typology" designed many years ago.

  Workforce planning returns and other workforce information submissions to DH contain little reference to new roles particularly at Assistant and Advanced practice levels, therefore the scope and flexibility for investing in them is severely limited.

4.  RECOMMENDATIONS

  The key recommendations have been grouped into five categories: leadership, strategy, infrastructure, operational functions and promotion.

  4.1  The practice of LMI workforce planning has suffered in part from:

    (a)  poor image;

    (b)  an inability to engage employers with the more strategic dimensions;

    (c)  poor coordination of resources and functions; and

    (d)  lack of strategic vision.

  There needs to be clear leadership in this area. The health sector would be best served by UK/national LMI bodies which represent the whole sector or by sub sector organisations which have a firm grasp of the strategic direction of health care as a whole.

  4.2  A UK strategy for the health care sector would necessarily span the sections here (leadership, infrastructure and operational functions).

  A future workforce: undertake strategic analyses of the characteristics of the workforce required and thus the types of LMI data which will be required in the future.

  Appraise the possibility of converging DH Census data with other UK national minimum data sets.

  Progress plans for harmonisation of UK skill surveys (4) in relation to:

    (i)  sector footprint;

    (ii)  methodology; and

    (iii)  latent skill shortages for health care sector.

  Need to explore potential with:

    —  Futureskills Scotland.

    —  Future skills Wales.

    —  NESS (England).

    —  Skills Monitoring Survey (NI).

  Determine the critical mass of capacity and capability required at regional level for effective use and application of national and regional LMI.

  Explore ways of linking short to medium and long term objectives in LMI planning: phasing of development programmes will be critical.

  Assess demand for a UK web based portal for information and advice on health sector LMI.

  4.3  Undertake an assessment and appraisal of a UK IT infrastructure which supports the integration of LMI national data sets (ie facilitate read across). There is significant work carried out in Scotland in this respect (SWISS).

  4.4  There should be better utilisation of existing data and intelligence across the whole sector in terms of existing workforce and the labour pool.

  Invest in the capture and collation of LMI data on staff relating to international recruitment and inward migration.

  Undertake assessment of future LMI needs in relation to the future workforce (the development of a flexible, competent staff).

  4.5  Promote greater understanding of:

    —  What LMI is.

    —  How it is generated.

    —  Better ways to disseminate findings.

    —  Improved approach to determining skills needs (current and future).

  Production and dissemination of research bulletins of reports from LMI research.

  Demonstrate link to productivity (via information to achieve greater effectiveness and efficiency) and indirectly to improved patient care.

Dr C Loughlan

Chief Executive, CIREM

14 March 2006






22   Not printed here. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 9 May 2006