Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by the Healthcare Commission (WP 67)

INTRODUCTION

  The Healthcare Commission exists to promote improvements in the quality of healthcare and public health in England and Wales.

  In England, we are responsible for assessing and reporting on the performance of both the NHS and independent healthcare organisations, to ensure they are providing a high standard of care. We also encourage providers, in both the public and independent sectors, to continually improve their services and the way they work. In Wales, our role is more limited and relates mainly to working on national reviews that cover England and Wales, as well as to our annual report on the state of healthcare.

  While much of the inquiry's terms of reference is outside our remit, the Healthcare Commission collects some evidence from NHS staff which is directly pertinent to the inquiry. The annual survey of NHS staff is conducted to provide information about the attitudes and experiences of directly employed NHS staff. Our submission summarises key results from the 2005 survey that may be of some use to the inquiry into workforce needs and planning in the NHS.

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL SURVEYS OF PATIENTS AND STAFF PROGRAMME

  The third national survey of NHS staff was conducted in October 2005 and this followed similar surveys in October 2003 and October 2004. The purpose of the surveys is to provide a variety of information about NHS staff in England which can be used by the NHS, the Department of Health and the Healthcare Commission to improve the quality of care for patients. All 570 NHS trusts in England took part in the survey. A total of 209,124 NHS employees responded, 58% of those who were invited to take part.

BACKGROUND TO THE NHS STAFF SURVEY

  The NHS Staff Survey contributes to the Healthcare Commission's annual ratings process. Some of the questions and key scores in the NHS Staff Survey 2005 are directly relevant to some of the Department of Health's Core Standards and will be used by the Healthcare Commission in the 2006 annual health check. The survey results also enable the Department of Health to assess the effectiveness of national NHS staff policies (such as training and flexible working) and in particular the Improving Working Lives initiative.

Summary of Key Findings

WORKING HOURS

  Work life balance is an important consideration for any workforce. Good work life balance is associated with the wellbeing of staff, low absenteeism and high levels of staff retention. In the 2003 and 2004 surveys, work life balance was found to have strong links to outcomes such as job satisfaction, stress, errors and incidents, and the intention of staff to leave their job.

  This survey asked staff how many hours, paid and unpaid, they worked in addition to their contracted hours during an average week. In total, 71% said they routinely worked more than their contracted hours. This is the same proportion as in 2004. Thirty six per cent said they work extra hours for which they are paid, and 56% extra hours for which they are not paid. Sixteen per cent said they worked extra hours, both paid and unpaid. There has been no significant change in the extent of additional hours being worked.

  One of the key indicators of staff feeling overloaded is the proportion of staff who work extra hours for reasons that are due to the pressure and demands of their job. That is, where they gave at least one of the following reasons: because it is necessary to meet deadlines; because it is expected by my immediate manager; because it is expected by colleagues; because it is impossible to do the job without doing so; or because I don't want to let down the people I work with. In 2005, 64% of staff said they did this, compared with 63% in 2004.

QUALITY OF WORK LIFE BALANCE

  Staff were asked a series of questions to assess the extent to which they believe that the trust they work for and their immediate manager are committed to helping them find a good balance between their work and home life. Possible scores range from one to five, with one representing almost no commitment from the trust, and five representing excellent commitment from the trust.

  The average score in the 2005 survey was 3.39, indicating a generally positive employer attitude towards work life balance. This compared with 3.42 in 2004 and 3.39 in 2003 and suggests that the attitude of NHS employers is stable.

IMPROVED RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION

  The provision of flexible working arrangements is important for employers, as it can lead to improved recruitment and retention of staff. The most common options were working flexi-time (33%), working reduced hours, for example part time (32%) and team rostering (27%).

  When asked about the care options offered by their employers, over half of staff with dependant children were not sure what options were on offer; 38% said they had access to a childcare coordinator, 30% said that their employer provided subsidised childcare, and 29% said their employer offered childcare vouchers. Comparing these figures with those for 2004 and 2003 suggests that either the level of care options is increasing, or an awareness of them is increasing (or possibly both awareness and supply are increasing).

  Staff were asked a series of questions about how satisfied they were with different facets of their jobs, including: recognition for good work; support from their immediate manager and colleagues; freedom to choose methods of working; amount of responsibility; opportunities to use their abilities; and the extent to which the trust values their work. Possible scores range from one to five, with one representing staff who were very dissatisfied and five representing staff who were very satisfied. The average score for job satisfaction was 3.44, indicating that staff in the NHS are generally fairly satisfied. However, this compares with scores of 3.55 and 3.50 in 2004 and 2003 respectively, suggesting a drop in the overall level of satisfaction since 2004.

  About a third of NHS staff (34%) either agreed or strongly agreed that they often think about leaving their current employer. A quarter (24%) said they would probably look for a new job at a new organisation within the next year. In the 2004 survey, these figures were 33% and 25% respectively, and in the 2003 survey 34% and 26% respectively, indicating relatively little change over time.

FLEXIBLE RETIREMENT

  The 2005 survey asked whether or not staff had been provided with information about flexible retirement. Twenty three per cent of staff aged 51 or over said that their trust had provided them with this information.

CHANGING ROLES AND IMPROVING SKILLS

  A good appraisal enables staff to have greater clarity about their role and to have their training needs identified, and leads to them feeling valued by their employer. Results from the 2003 and 2004 surveys have shown that staff who had received an appraisal in the previous 12 months were more satisfied with their jobs and less likely to be considering leaving.

  In the 2005 survey, 60% of staff had had an appraisal or performance development review in the previous 12 months. This compares with 63% in the 2004 survey, and 60% in the 2003 survey, suggesting that the apparent increase in 2004 was not a lasting improvement.

  Personal development plans (PDPs) are an important feature of systems for appraising staff. Nearly half (47%) of all respondents had agreed a PDP with their line manager as part of their appraisal in the previous 12 months. Of those who had agreed a PDP in the previous 12 months, 56% had since received the training, learning and development that was identified in the plan while 25% said their PDP had taken place too recently to say.

  Training, learning and development have been shown in many studies to be linked with good organisational, and individual, performance. Ninety five per cent of staff said they had taken part in at least one type of training, learning or development that was supported by their employer in the previous 12 months. This compares with 93% in 2004 and 89% in the 2003 survey. It is possible that this increase is because a larger number of types of training were mentioned specifically on the questionnaire in 2005 compared with previous years. Staff were also asked whether they had experienced difficulties obtaining training, learning or development from their trust in the previous 12 months. Overall, 79% said they had experienced some difficulty. The most commonly experienced difficulties were getting time off work and getting cover for work to attend training, training at inconvenient times and a lack of funding for training.

  Copies of the report, National Survey of NHS staff 2005, Summary of key findings, will be available on the Healthcare Commission's website www.healthcarecommission.org.uk, from Wednesday 22 March 2006.

Healthcare Commission

17 March 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 9 May 2006