Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by the Health Professions Council (WP 76)

  The Health Professions Council welcomes the opportunity to give evidence to the Health Select Committee's workforce planning enquiry. The following is designed to give a brief overview to the role of HPC, and more detail about some particular areas of HPC's responsibility which could be of interest to workforce planning.

ABOUT THE HPC

  1.  The Health Professions Council is a UK wide healthcare regulator, established by the Health Professions Order 2001 ("the Order"). It registers around 170,000 members of the following thirteen professions:

    —  Arts therapists;

    —  Biomedical scientists;

    —  Chiropodists and podiatrists;

    —  Clinical scientists;

    —  Dietitians;

    —  Occupational therapists;

    —  Operating department practitioners;

    —  Orthoptists;

    —  Paramedics;

    —  Physiotherapists;

    —  Prosthetists and orthotists;

    —  Radiographers; and

    —  Speech and language therapists.

  2.  The HPC was established to protect the public, in the words of the Order, "to safeguard the health and well-being of persons using or needing the services of registrants". In order to do this, it runs four key functions:

    —  setting standards for health professionals, including standards for professional skills and knowledge, education and training, continuing professional development, conduct, character and health;

    —  keeping a register of health professionals that meet those standards;

    —  approving programmes which lead to entry to the Register; and

    —  taking action when health professionals do not meet those standards.

PROTECTING PROFESSIONAL TITLES

  3.  The Health Professions Order protects common professional titles, meaning that only HPC registered health professionals can use protected titles such as "physiotherapist" or "chiropodist". Anyone who uses a protected title who is not on the HPC Register can be prosecuted and fined up to £5,000. HPC undertook research with the public in 2002 to establish the most commonly recognised and commonly used titles for each profession, and can protect further titles if necessary.

  4. Regulation of title not function establishes a flexible system of regulation, which does not stifle innovation and development, and allows employers and providers to devise flexible ways of delivering healthcare. Registered health professionals can develop their scope of practice as they progress in their career: they can specialise, or move into an advanced role, provided that they are able to do so safely. All health professionals are required to meet the HPC's standards of conduct, performance and ethics, which require them to work within their scope of practice, and any health professional who does not may have action taken against them which could result in them being struck off the Register.

NEW PROFESSIONS

  5.  Under the Health Professions Order, the HPC can also make recommendations to the Secretary of State regarding other professions which it believes should be regulated. In October 2004, operating department practitioners became the first new group to join the HPC Register.

  6.  New professions (aspirant groups) can make an application to the Council to be considered for regulation. The Council has established ten criteria against which it assesses applications, which include the requirements that the group must cover a discrete area of activity displaying some homogeneity and operate a voluntary register.

  7.  Thus far, the Council has considered applications by nine groups, including applied psychologists, clinical technologists, and clinical physiologists. In addition, the Council has been approached by over 40 groups who have expressed an interest in being HPC regulated.

APPROVING PROGRAMMES

  8.  The HPC approves programmes (courses) which lead to registration. This is done by assessing programmes against the HPC's Standards of Education and Training, and the Standards of Proficiency. The assessment is carried out by "Visitors" who are registered health professionals. They visit education providers to meet programme staff, placement providers, students and others, in order to write their report on how far the programme meets the standards. If approved, the programme is added to the HPC approved course list, which is published online. Students who successfully complete the course can then apply for registration with HPC.

  9.  In planning workforce development which requires the establishment of new programmes, it may be useful to know that a six month lead time is necessary to schedule a visit with our Education department.

THE REGISTRATION PROCESS

  10.  Having completed an approved programme, students then need to register with HPC before they can practise using the protected title for their profession. Most UK graduates, numbering around 8,000, submit their applications during the peak summer period. The HPC therefore recommends to students that they allow at least two weeks between submitting their application, and the time when they need to be registered in order to practise.

  11.  When applying for registration, applicants need to send information to HPC which includes:

    —  A health reference signed by their GP;

    —  A character reference signed by someone "of professional standing in the community"; and

    —  A copy of their passport and birth certificate.

  12.  HPC runs a series of student talks, delivered to final year students, to explain the registration process, how regulation works, and the standards expected of registrants.

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS FROM OUTSIDE THE UK

  13.  Health professionals who trained outside the UK must apply to HPC to be registered. HPC uses registration assessors, who are trained health professionals, to look at each application individually to see whether it meets the Standards of Proficiency. Each applicant provides information about their education, training and experience to be assessed. If the registration assessors consider that the applicant meets the standards, they will recommend that they should be registered. The time to process an application via the international registration process is fifteen weeks at the time of writing.

STATISTICS

  14.  The HPC registration database holds information about all 170,000 health professionals currently and previously registered, including their sex, date of birth, work address, and other information. HPC can provide this information (anonymised to protect registrants' identity) which may be of use to workforce planning in, for example ascertaining the numbers of health professionals who are likely to retire over a given period, or the pattern of distribution across different age brackets, broken down by gender. As an example of the kinds of information HPC can provide, attached to this response is a breakdown of the numbers of registered physiotherapists, by year of birth and gender.

THE FOSTER REVIEW

  15.  At the time of writing this response to the committee, the Foster review of non-medical regulation has not yet been published. This review, which was run concurrently with the Donaldson review of medical regulation, is expected to make recommendations about the future of regulation which will have an impact on HPC and how it is run. In particular, the remit of the review included topics such as revalidation, the regulation of assistant practitioners and advanced practitioners, and the fitness to practise process. The HPC is looking forward to the publication of the results of the Foster review, and will work with the government to implement the proposals.

WORKFORCE PLANNING AND THE HPC

  16.  Our role as a regulator means that HPC does not have direct input into workforce planning issues, other than to provide information for other organisations who are looking into health needs. However, moving forward it could be useful for HPC to be involved at an earlier stage in this process. HPC could provide information (as above) to inform planning, and could if alerted make its own preparations for any proposed changes in the numbers of health professionals to be registered. Depending on the outcome of the Foster review, planned developments in health professions' roles could also inform the standards that we set, or could be considered in the light of our new professions process.

Health Professions Council

April 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 9 May 2006