Evidence submitted by the Royal College
of Nursing (WP 42)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) represents
over 380,000 registered nurses, midwives, health visitors, nursing
students, health care assistants and nurse cadets in the UK. This
makes the RCN the largest professional union of nursing staff
in the world. The RCN promotes patient and nursing interests on
a wide range of issues by working closely with government, the
UK parliaments and other national and European political institutions,
trade unions, professional bodies and voluntary organisations.
2.0 SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 The RCN recommends a comprehensive centralised
function for workforce planning across the UK health sector. This
approach will ensure that the gaps in knowledge about the workforce
are filled, trends can be monitored, including movement between
countries and different health sectors (private and independent)
and also the profile and aspirations of the workforce.
2.2 This approach is fundamental to ensuring
NHS care is fair and equitable rather than dependant on local
circumstances or markets which could lead to variation in healthcare
staffing and care quality.
2.3 Worryingly it is unclear where workforce
planning lies under the reconfigured NHS. This is especially important
with the increase in choice and plurality of providers.
2.4 There is a growing body of evidence
that links the numbers of registered nurses in the acute hospital
sector to patient outcomes. Effectively, patients are more likely
to die in the surgical settings studied when there were fewer
registered nurses on the ward. The RCN recommends that further
research is urgently needed to ascertain impacts of the workforce
on patient outcomes in order to base changing roles within the
health care workforce rather than merely cost.
2.5 The patient: nurse ratio findings are
particularly worrying given the context of financial pressures
on the NHS in which the RCN has noticed a growing trend to limit
workforce numbers. All Trust should have the option to stage deficits
for an agreed period of one to three years as agreed within the
health economy where achieving in year balance may restrict choice
and adversely impact service provision.
2.6 Advanced and extended nurse roles have
made a considerable contribution in a number of areas for instance
reducing junior doctors hours, and caring for patients at home
avoiding hospital admissions. The RCN recommends more attention
is paid to advanced nursing roles within workforce planning including
investment in nurse education.
2.7 Technology must be properly integrated
into working systems, alongside increased access for nurses and
healthcare staff supported by training and education.
2.8 The RCN welcomed the Governments drive
to increase the number of nurses. However, sustainability in the
level of growth of registered nurses is unlikely in the future.
Continued focus on recruitment and retention is vital including
sustained use of good employment practices.
2.9 Agenda for Change (AfC) incorporated
into service contracts in the same way that soft facilities AfC
rights have been safeguarded in the private sector, likewise NHS
pension regulations.
2.10 Code of Practice on international recruitment
is extended to the independent and private sectors and made mandatory.
3. HOW EFFECTIVELY
WORKFORCE PLANNING,
INCLUDING CLINICAL
AND MANAGERIAL
STAFF, HAS
BEEN UNDERTAKEN?
3.1 Until recently, healthcare workforce
planning in England was more centralised. National data has been
collected and trends monitored by the national Workforce Review
Team with implementation by Workforce Development Confederations
aligned to each Strategic Health Authority (SHA). However, responsibility
for workforce planning does not appear to be included as part
of the newly configured SHA and we do not know where this function
will lie in the future or even if it will still exist.
3.2 Information on the health care workforce
has been and remains limited and imperfect which works against
effective planning. The RCN commissions an annual Labour Market
Review (LMR) of the nursing workforce and an annual employment
survey of RCN members to monitor workforce developments. The RCN
identified shortcomings in workforce information in 2002 and compared
progress made on these gaps in 2005 (Appendix 1).
3.3 The RCN welcomes the Governments drive
to increase the number of nurses which has seen an increase in
registered nurses in the NHS by 23% full time equivalents in England
since 1997. However, the recruitment drive has not ended staffing
shortages, prevented nurses working unpaid overtime or reduced
reported heavy workloads. [108]Furthermore,
increased student nurse commissioned places is being undermined
by vacancy freezes due to deficits. These graduates will be lost
to the system.
3.4 The growing demands of the health service
combined with a growth in evidence linking the numbers of registered
nurses in the acute hospital sector to patient outcomes including
quality of care and patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes
including adjusted mortality rates and morbidity rates, contribute
to the imperative that nursing numbers should be maintained at
an appropriate level.
3.5 For example, recent independent research
in the UK setting by Professor Anne Marie Rafferty, University
of London, reveals that for surgical patients in 30 NHS acute
hospitals their chance of associated mortality was increased by
12 to 49% in hospitals with the lowest registered nurse to patient
ratios. [109]Put
another way patients are more likely to die in the surgical settings
studied when there were fewer registered nurses on the ward. This
is supported by a review of research by West, Rafferty and Lankshear[110]
research that demonstrated links between higher numbers of registered
nurses in the nursing workforce with improved patient outcomes
in the US.
3.6 Determining the threshold or ideal equation
of registered nurse to patient ratios is complex and not amenable
to national prescription, for a number of reasons including seriousness
of patient illness and case mix, treatment and support function
facilities and even ward lay out. However there are some key principles
which ward managers can apply to determine appropriate (rather
than minimum) nurse: patient ratios. The RCN is currently developing
work in this area.
4. IN CONSIDERING
FUTURE DEMAND,
HOW SHOULD
THE EFFECTS
OF THE
FOLLOWING BE
TAKEN INTO
ACCOUNT?
4.1 Recent policy announcements, including
Commissioning a patient led NHS (CPLNHS)
4.1.1 There is uncertainty and low morale
amongst the nursing workforce about the impact of CPLNHS. A major
concern relates to issues of employment, specifically who will
employ them. This may impact on their decision to take early retirement
or leave the service.
4.1.2 The drift of the Government's White
Paper "Our health, our care, our say" proposes moving
care away from the acute and into community settings. However,
the increased role for nurses in the primary and community sector
indicated by the White Paper could be undermined by the age profile
of this group of nurses. When compared with the average age of
all NHS nurses, this particular workforce has the oldest age profile
with about 23% of District nurses, Health visitors and Community
nurses aged between 40 and 50 years. Moreover, some nurse specialisms
for example Health visitors have seen no growth in numbers and
others, such as District nurses have experienced a decline in
numbers.
4.1.3 Under the CPLNHS proposals Primary
Care Trusts would remain employers as long as they wanted to,
the reality is that PCTs service provision in many cases may be
outsourced. The TUPE protection for staff moving from the public
to the private sector is a very weak provision and easily eroded
4.1.4 The RCN want to see Agenda for Change
(AfC) secured. This means that AfC terms and conditions are incorporated
into service contracts in the same way that soft facilities AfC
rights have been safeguarded in the private sector.
4.1.5 Similarly, there is no provision for
the independent sector or private businesses to adhere to NHS
pension regulations. The RCN does not want to see the reforms
delivered through a two-tier workforce and recommends that if
a provider supplies an NHS service is should be under NHS conditions.
4.2 Technological change
4.2.1 The RCN welcomes the introduction
of new technology and the impact that this could have on the nursing
and healthcare workforce. Currently, the amount of time nurses
spend on administrative work is estimated to be around 25%. The
evidence of the impact of technology use ie Telehealth on the
clinical workforce suggests that a decrease in workload would
be achieved only where integrated technological solutions are
used and where workflows are changed to reflect new ways of working.
4.2.2 In 2005, an RCN survey of members
highlighted access and training as key issues. Access to IT is
mixed although 88% of members used a computer daily about a third
shared a computer with around 20 people. Also, community nurses
have very limited access if at all. The survey also found a major
lack of IT training opportunities within the NHS. The user needs
to have the knowledge to use the technology effectively.
4.2.3 In addition the datapatient
recordsneed to be complete and current in order to provide
appropriate care. Of those who responded to the survey 63% felt
that without timely access to accurate and complete records, the
care they deliver could be ineffective or even unsafe.
4.2.4 The RCN recommends that technology
must be properly integrated into working systems, alongside increased
access for nurses and healthcare staff supported by training and
education.
4.3 The increasing use of private providers
of services
4.3.1 The Government's drive toward increasing
patient choice and the diversification of providers will undoubtedly
make workforce planning more complex, with increased competition
for nursing staff in local labour markets.
4.3.2 With the increase in providers it
is likely that there will be more variation in terms and conditions
of nurses' employment contracts. The RCN recommends using Agenda
for Change pay scales in all sectors incorporated into service
contracts. If organisations are providing an NHS service it should
be under NHS conditions.
4.3.3 The contract for Wave 1 of the Independent
Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) contained an additionality clause
which prevented providers from employing staff who either worked
in or had worked in the NHS in the previous six months. This clause
is being relaxed in the current procurement for phase 2 ISTCs.
The clause will only apply to staff in specialist areas where
there is a known shortage. The work undertaken to identify shortage
has raised concerns regarding the lack of workforce information
in relation to nursing.
5. HOW WILL
THE ABILITY
TO MEET
DEMANDS BE
AFFECTED BY:
5.1 Financial constraints
5.1.1 The RCN has been monitoring the impact
of financial constraints on patient care services. [111]The
RCN believe that deficits in trusts in England could hit £1.2
billion. Last year's National Audit Office report indicated that
deficits totalled £140 million, however, for this year there
have been reports that the total level of deficits could be between
£750 million (Health Service Journal) and £1.6
billion ( (Health Emergency)
5.1.2 We have noticed a general trend in
how NHS organisations progressively respond:
Bans on the use of temporary staff;
Vacancy freezesthis impacts
on the intake of students;
Limitations on service provision,
for example, health visiting;
"Disinvestment" in some
clinical services;
Staff redundancies, voluntary or
compulsory.
5.1.3 In order to prevent instability in
service provision Trusts should be allowed to operate within a
more flexible financial regime. Short term cost cutting can seriously
impact medium and long term improvements in service provision.
In an RCN survey of 1,000 nurses in February 2006 over a quarter
of those surveyed cited that patient treatments were being delayed
in order to save money.
5.1.4 All Trust should have the option to
defer deficits for an agreed period of one to three years as agreed
within the health economy where achieving in year balance will
restrict choice and adversely impact service provision.
5.1.5 Furthermore, sustainability in the
level of growth of registered nurses is unlikely in the future,
partly as a result of increased government funding in the NHS
ending in 2007-08. [112]
5.2 The European Working Time Directive (EWTD)
5.2.1 Implementation of the EWTD, without
compromising patient care, demands new approaches to staffing
and service deliver with Nurse practitioners and other advanced
nursing roles making a positive impact on patient outcomes.
5.2.2 Advances and extended nurse roles
have made a considerable contribution to current compliance with
EWTD/reduced junior doctors working hours and this is recognised
within the Department of Health evaluation of the "Hospital
at Night" scheme. Nurses are now often the first point of
contact and deal with a substantial proportion of patients who
are acutely ill and need intervention. As of June 2005, over two
dozen hospitals across England have implemented the Hospital at
Night concept for out-of-hours cover.
5.2.3 More generally, a joint Department
of Health/RCN recent survey Maxi Nurses: Advanced and Specialist
Nursing Roles[113]
reveals that advanced nursing practice (by nurse practitioners,
clinical nurse specialists, specialist nurses and nurse consultants)
has significantly contributed to improved patient care and service
capacity, including caring for patients at home thus avoiding
hospital additions. In addition these roles aide meeting targets
in a variety of settings including accident and emergency departments
and clinical diagnostic services:
60% of these nurses' time is spent
in clinical activity;
one third say patients can access
their expertise directly; and
one quarter provide on-going and
continuous care and treatment of the same patients.
5.2.4 There is also hard evidence to demonstrate
the effectiveness of nurse practitioners in patient care. For
example a recent Cochrane review[114]which
is a "gold standard" structured review of researchfound
that nurse practitioners in primary care had at least equivalent
patient outcomes to doctors, and in fact scored higher in terms
of patient satisfaction.
5.2.5 However there are difficulties for
nurses in obtaining funding for national courses in advanced practice
such as the nurses practitioner programme, and also problems with
"backfilling" their posts whilst they study. Yet appropriate
education and support is an essential prerequisite for
advanced nursing roles.
5.2.6 The RCN recommends more attention
is paid to advanced nursing roles within workforce planning including
investment in nurse education for advanced nursing roles across
a range of sectors including mental health and learning disabilities.
5.3 Increasing international competition for
staff
5.3.1 International recruitment grew rapidly
in the late 90s and last year accounted for about 40% of new entrants
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). Apart from data from the
NMC register on nurses entering the UK, there is no monitoring
of the movement of international nurses either in the NHS or the
Independent sector. There is no available data on the flow of
UK-trained nurses going to work abroad or the movement of nursing
staff between the four UK countries.
5.3.2 Buchan's report[115]
for the Kings Fund reports on the country and demographic profile,
motivations, experiences and career plans of recently recruited
international nurses working in London, and gives a detailed insight
into why they have come to the UK, and what their future intentions
are. In order to put these findings in context, the paper also
outlines the overall trends in the number of nurses coming to
the UK, and examines the policy context in which international
recruitment activity has been conducted.
5.3.3 The NHS in London has more staff vacancies
and shortages than the rest of the country and employers have
become increasingly reliant on overseas health workers to make
good the staffing shortfall. [116]The
annual survey of RCN members in 2003 found that 14% of nurses
based in London had qualified outside the UK compared with just
4% in the UK as a whole.
5.3.4 London is also more vulnerable to
outflows of these workers. Buchan argues that alongside the challenge
to develop effective human resources strategies to support and
integrate these staff in the NHS will be the challenge to retain
these staff as other countries seek qualified staff to boost their
own workforces. Sustained use of good employment practice that
encourages staff to stay in, and return to, the NHS and the local
recruitment of new workers as part of a "grow your own"
strategy, will, according to Buchan reduce the need for international
recruitment.
5.4 Early Retirement
5.4.1 The RCN annual employment survey 2005[117]
shows that one in six of all nurses intend to continue to work
in nursing beyond retirement age which is 60 for current employees.
There is some variation between sectors; the planned retirement
age of respondents in the independent sector is 60 (NHS, 59) and
respondents' ideal retirement age is 57 (NHS 56). [118]
5.4.2 In 1991 one in four (26%) nurses on
the register was aged under 30 but by 2005 this had dropped to
only about one in 10. At the same time, the proportion of nurses
on the register who were 55 or older had risen from 9% to 16%.
More than 100,000 nurses are now aged 55 or older and a further
80,000 are 50 to 55 years-old.
5.4.3 Buchan argues that the level of nurses
leaving the register is bound to grow as the large numbers aged
50-plus increases over the decade. It is also likely that fewer
of the older nurses who remain on the register are likely to continue
working and older nurses who do continue to work are less likely
to work full-time.
5.4.4 This is partly because of the reductions
in student nurse intakes in the early to mid-1990s. It is also
partly the result of a trend towards an older age profile of students
with more mature entrants, and the emphasis on attracting those
returning to the profession.
5.4.5 The main challenge for workforce planning
will be to replace the 180,000 nurses who are 50 plus and who
are considering retirement or to encourage them to delay retirement.
5.4.6 The impact of phasing in a higher
pensionable age for new entrants will also need to be monitored
in terms of retirement behaviour and its effect on the attractiveness
of nursing as a career.
6. TO WHAT
EXTENT CAN,
AND SHOULD
DEMAND BE
MET, FOR
BOTH CLINICAL
AND MANAGERIAL
STAFF BY:
6.1 CHANGING
THE ROLES
AND IMPROVING
THE SKILLS
OF EXISTING
STAFF
As stated above, nurses have expanded and advanced
their roles in order to accommodate reform, and improve patient
care. However, further investment in educational preparation for
advanced practice roles is needed in order to continue to progress
this trend.
6.1.2 There are difficulties for nurses
in obtaining funding for national courses in advanced practice
such as the nurse practitioner programme, and also problems with
"backfilling" their posts whilst they study. Changing
the roles of healthcare staff is much more complex than simply
passing work from one group, for example doctors, down to another,
for example nurses, and so on. Changing roles is also a dynamic
process and depends upon the numbers of staff, their skills and
expertise, patient acuity and case mix, but especially how health
care staff function and work together as a team.
6.1.3 The evidence base in this area is
limited, but growing. There are three main areas of research,
which can inform current policy and practice: improving multi-disciplinary
team work; skill mix within nursing; and, skill mix between nurses
and doctors.[119],
[120]
6.2 Better retention and the recruitment of
new staff in England
6.2.1 The 2004 report on improving recruitment
and retention in primary care commissioned by the Department of
Health[121]
aimed to find out what will assist Primary Care Trusts and Workforce
Development Confederations to establish flexible and supportive
entry routes and programmes that will enable nurses to work in
primary care at registered nurse level.
6.2.2 The RCN Labour Market Review 2004-05[122]
also gives some figures on the number of nurses completing return
to practice courses and other data on retention and recruitment
of nurses.
6.2.3 Research suggests that nurse choice
in shift decisions may alleviate some of the ill effects of shift
work, and may promote nurse recruitment, retention and return
to practice. Work schedules impact on many aspects of nurses'
working and domestic lives, and on their retention in the workplace.
A number of studies suggest that nurse retention is related to
control or choice over working lives and conditions, and that
rigidity of rostering results in increased nurse turnover. [123]
6.2.4 Student attrition is another area
of concern. A survey carried out by Nursing Standard magazine
revealed that around one in four student nurses are failing to
complete their training courses. The RCN recommends monitoring
students' reasons for leaving their training in order to provide
evidence that could help to reduce attrition rates in the future.
6.3 International recruitment
6.3.1 A report, by the Health Systems Resource
Centre, [124]provides
an overview of the implications of international recruitment of
health workers to the United Kingdom. The authors recommend that
data on the numbers of international nurses recruited by and working
in the NHS be routinely collected. They also suggest that Department
of International Development examine the potential of working
with representative bodies from the independent sector to develop
a parallel Code of Practice on international recruitment.
6.3.2 Our member survey indicates the heavy
reliance that nursing has on overseas recruitment. Although all
registered nurses are included on the UK Work Permits shortage
list, this is currently being reviewed with a steer from the Department
of Health to remove nursing from the list. If this is actioned
it will create difficulties for ensuring an adequate nursing workforce.
6.3.3 The RCN recommends that data is collected
on the numbers of international nurses recruited from overseas
and working in the NHS and private sector and monitored.
6.3.4 The RCN also recommends that the Code
of Practice on international recruitment is extended to the independent
and private sectors and made mandatory.
7. HOW SHOULD
PLANNING BE
UNDERTAKEN?
7.1 To what extent should it be centralised
or decentralised
7.1.1 In the early 1990s workforce planning
was left to local planning decision and direction. This led directly
to shortages of registered nurses because insufficient numbers
of pre-registration nurse education places were commissioned,
insufficient attention was paid to independent health sector recruitment,
and local and national problems with recruitment and retention
of qualified nurses were not detected or remedied. [125]
7.1.2 The RCN believes there should be a
centralised function for workforce planning across the UK health
sector in order that trends can be monitored, including movement
between countries and different health sectors but also the profile
and aspirations of the workforce. This is fundamental to ensure
NHS care is fair and equitable rather than dependant on local
circumstances or markets which could lead to further variation
in healthcare staffing and care quality. The approach will also
avoid "see-sawing" with drives to recruit then redundancies.
7.1.3 The international literature seems
to support workforce planning for the entire health service "integrated
workforce planning" taking into account changing roles and
the reconfiguration of services. [126]
7.2 How is flexibility to be ensured?
7.2.1 Knowledge about local and regional
workforce and labour market issues will be vital, however as the
number of employers increase and job mobility and flexibility
increases, monitoring movement between employers will need to
be centralised in some way.
7.2.3 Without this approach, there will
be more scope for ever increasing gaps in knowledge about the
healthcare workforce as nurses move in and out of the NHS or increasingly
work through banks and agencies, making strategic planning increasingly
more difficult to manage.
7.3 What examples of good practice can be
found in England and elsewhere?
7.3.1 The growing recognition of the linkages
between effective staffing levels and outcomes (including patient
safety) have led to attempts to identify the "best"
methods of determining staffing levels.[127],
128[128]
However there is evidence that different systems applied in the
same care environment will give different staffing "answers".[129]
7.3.2 Examples of computer-based projections
and simulation models used to forecast human resource needs are
discussed along with their limitations. [130]Best
practice examples are given from Scotland where planning involves
projections, combined with involvement from stakeholders (see
below).
MULTI STAKEHOLDER
WORKFORCE PLANNING
IN SCOTLAND
The nurse workforce planning system in Scotland
is one working example that involves employers and the private
sector in national level nurse workforce planning. [131]This
annual system uses "bottom up" planning involving all
health service employers, as well as representatives from nursing
associations and the education sector. The approach attempts a
whole system perspective by factoring in estimates of future demand
for nurses from the private sector. There is now a statutory duty
on the NHS in Scotland to carry out workforce planning.
7.3.3 Some countries have used national
recommended staffing rates but these vary in terms of definition,
source, and the extent to which they could be regarded as mandatory
or minimum, and they often apply to narrow, precise specialties.
Alison Cairns
Royal College of Nursing
15 March 2006
APPENDIX 1
MIND THE INFORMATION GAP: GROWING THE WORKFORCE[132]
Things we need to know
| The reality |
(1) We do not have accurate UK wide attrition rates during pre-registration of nursing and midwifery education.
| A common definition has been agreed in England for common measurement but there is currently no complete and comparable data across the UK.
|
(2) We do not know with any accuracy how many newly qualified nurses and midwives take up employment in the NHS or elsewhere.
| No improvement: has been made more problematic because of changes in student indexing
|
(3) We have little published evidence of the actual retirement behaviour of nurses; a vital issue given that so many are in the 50+ age group.
| Little improvement: and the issue is now even more significant because of ageing workforce and proposed changes in NHS retirement scheme for future entrants.
|
(4) We have no accurate knowledge of how many of the growing number of overseas registrants are actually working in the UK, or where they are based.
| No improvement. NHS in England does not record how many international nurses it employs, despite this being recommended by House of Commons Committee. No accurate information on outflow of nurses.
|
(5) We have only scant information on the "cross border" flows of nurses between the four UK countriesthis is likely to become a growing issue with devolved government and diverging health policies in the four countries.
| No improvement in published information |
(6) We have no recent detailed information on the actual number of "re-entrants" who stay working in the NHS after refresher training, where they are working, and the hours they work
| Worsened. Return to practice data no longer collated in national level in England.
|
(7) We do not have consistent or complete information on vacancy rates across the four countries to assess the impact of shortages
| No improvement; and more questions being asked about relevance of "point in time" three month vacancy rate.
|
(8) We do not have complete data on flows of "joiners and leavers" in the NHS to assess with any accuracy the current sources of recruits and destinations of nurses leaving the NHS.
| No improvement in England; major source is OME sample survey, with worsening response rates.
|
(9) We have only scant information about the dimensions of the growing non-NHS nursing labour market and the "flows" of nurses between the NHS and other nursing employment.
| Worsened. Data no longer collated nationally in England
|
(10) We do not have UK wide information about the ethnic composition of the UK nursing population or workforce, to enable any assessment for potential to recruit, or to monitor equal opportunities in employment.
| Attempts at improvement, but changes in definitions, and large "unknown" response rate limit utility of data.
|
| |
108
Buchan, J. and Seecombe, I. Op Cit. Back
109
Forthcoming publication: personal correspondence. Back
110
West, E., Rafferty, AM., Lankshear, A. (2004) The Future
Nurse: Evidence of the Impact of Registered Nurses London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London
and University of York, RCN: London. Back
111
RCN Policy Unit (2006) Deficits Briefing RCN: London. Back
112
NHS Confederation (2005). Money in the NHS: The Facts.
NHS Confederation, London. Back
113
Ball J. (2005) Maxi Nurses: Advanced and Specialist Roles
Employment Research/RCN: London Back
114
Laurant, M. (2005) Substitution of Doctors by Nurses in Primary
Care: Cochrane Collaboration Review John Wiley and Sons: London. Back
115
Internationally recruited nurses in London, profile and implications
for policy, Jim Buchan, September 2005, ISBN 1 8517 533 6. Back
116
International recruitment of health workers to the capital,
James Buchan, Renu Jobanputra , Pippa Gough, July 2004, ISBN 1857175042. Back
117
Ball J, Pike G (2005) Managing to work differently, London:
RCN. Publication code 003 006 and Nurses in the Independent Sector
2005, London: RCN Publication code 003 019. Back
118
Ball J, Pike G (2003) Stepping stones, London: RCN. Publication
code 002 235. See also Buchan J (1999) The greying of the UK nursing
workforce: implications for employment policy and practice, Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 33 (9), pp 818-826. Back
119
Kinnersley P, Anderson E, Parry K et al. (2000). Randomised control
trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for
patients requesting same day consultation in primary care. British
Medical Journal. 7241 (320):1043-1048, UK. Back
120
Buchan J, Dal Poz M (2002). Skill mix in the health care workforce:
reviewing the evidence. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation
80 (7): 575-580, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Back
121
Flexible entry to primary care nursing project 2004, Improving
recruitment and retention in primary care, Vari Drennan, Sarah
Andrews, Rajinder Sidhu, Project leader: Professor Sarah Andrews.
Commissioned and funded by the Department of Health Back
122
RCN Labour Market Review, Past trends, Future Imperfect? A review
of the UK labour market in 2004/2005, Jim Buchan. Back
123
Duxbury, M L and Armstrong, G.D. Calculating Nurse Turnover
Indices. Journal of Nurse Adm 1982; Brown, P. Punching
the body clock, Nursing Times 1988; 84: 26-28 and Burton,
C E and Burton,D T. Job expectations of senior nursing students.
Journal of Nurse Adm 1982. Back
124
Buchan J, Dovlo D (2004). International Recruitment of Health
Workers to the UK: A Report for the Department For International
Development. DFID Health Systems Resource Centre, London, UK.
http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC19758.htm. Back
125
Buchan, J. and Seecombe, I. (2005) Past Trends Future Imperfect?:
A Review of the UK Nursing Labour Market 2204/5 RCN: London. Back
126
Tackling Nurse Shortages in OECD Countries 2005; Steven Simoens,
Mike Villeneuve and Jeremy Hurst for the Directorate for Employment,
Labour and Social Affairs. Back
127
Hurst K (2002). Selecting and Applying Methods for Estimating
the Size and Mix of Nursing Teams. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for
Health, UK. Back
128
Scottish Executive, Health Department (2004). Nursing and Midwifery
Workload and Workforce Planning Project. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh,
UK. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/health/nwww.pdf. Back
129
See eg Cockerill R, O'Brien-Pallas, Bolley H, Pink G (1993),
Measuring Worklkoad for Case Costing. Nursing Economics, 11(6)
342-350, AJJ Publishing, USA. Back
130
O'Brien-Pallas L, Baumann A, Donner G, Tomblin Murphy G, Lochhaas
J, Luba M (2001). Forecasting models for human resources in health
care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (1) 120-129, Blackwell
Publishing, UK. Back
131
Scottish Executive (2001). Student Nurse and Midwife Numbers,
The Report of the Reference Group on Student Nurse Intake Planning,
Scottish Executive Health Department, Edinburgh, UK. Back
132
Buchan and Seecombe (2005) Op Cit. Back
|