Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by the American Pharmaceutical Group (Def 29)

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The current NHS deficit is reported as approximately £800 million. Although this amount is large, it is a small proportion of the overall annual NHS spend (1.2% of the NHS budget) and has been generated by a small number of NHS trusts. It should also be noted that the NHS has always had deficits. Greater transparency has lead to a clearer identification of where these deficits lie.

  1.2  Similarly the amount spent on prescribed pharmaceutical medicines is also a small proportion of the overall spend (11.2%). Pharmaceutical medicines are often viewed purely as a cost for the NHS. However, this is a relatively simplistic view and does not take into account the wider cost-saving effects a drug can provide. Pharmaceutical medicines may prevent patients from requiring more expensive hospital care, reduce the need for nursing care and help to keep patients at work. This has the knock-on benefit of helping to reduce costs in other government departments; for example if a patient is able to return to work this reduces the cost of incapacity benefits provided by the Department for Work and Pensions. If used effectively spending on medicines can save the NHS and government money in the long-term as well as helping to improve the health of the nation.

  1.3  The cost of pharmaceutical medicines in the UK is controlled by the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS). The PPRS ensures reasonably priced medicines for the NHS and supports a successful British-based pharmaceutical industry. Supporting the pharmaceutical industry in this way promotes and funds research and development in the UK, leading to new and novel medicines for NHS patients.

2.  THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP

  2.1  The American Pharmaceutical Group (APG) represents the ten leading research based US owned pharmaceutical companies who invest in the UK. The group was established in 1985 to improve understanding of the industry, and the healthcare contribution of the American companies in particular, among Government, Parliament and interested stakeholders.

  2.2  Collectively, we account for over 35% of UK sales of prescription medicines and employ over 17,000 highly qualified staff with over 4,500 working in research and development (R&D) and almost 4,000 in manufacturing. As a Group we invest over £1.5 billion a year in R&D and export more than £1.7 billion of prescribed medicines.

3.  NHS DEFICITS

  3.1  The current NHS deficit appears to be multi-factorial, caused by both systemic and local pressures and failings; as well as greater levels of transparency which has prevented such deficits from being hidden. It is often assumed that rising costs of pharmaceutical medicines has pushed the NHS into deficit. However, the pricing and distribution of medicines in this country is highly regulated and there has not been a rise in the price of medicines for over 15 years. In fact, in real terms medicines are cheaper now than they were ten years ago. In order for a medicine to be prescribed, it must first prove its clinical effectiveness and safety before it is given a licence by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) may then issue guidance on whether this medicine or procedure is cost effective for the NHS.

  3.2  We support the activities of the current Government to deliver care closer to patients' homes and our members are researching new medicines to enable more home-based care across a wide range of disease areas. While it may be politically expedient to cut spending on medicines at a time of retrenchment in the service—this is a short-sighted approach, given the numbers of people whose health is maintained by pharmaceutical support. In the long-term this cut may result in many more patients needing hospital or nursing care: an ultimately more expensive scenario.

  3.3  The greater part of the NHS budget is not spent on medicines (88.8%). This spending is not nearly as highly regulated as medicines spending which is controlled by the PPRS, the MHRA and NICE. NHS practices will need to be assessed on a similar cost-effective and clinical basis to identify inefficiencies, if NHS trusts in deficits are to turn things around.

4.  THE COST OF MEDICINES

  4.1  The cost of pharmaceutical medicines in the UK is controlled by the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS). The PPRS acts to ensure reasonably priced branded medicines for the NHS on the one hand, and a competitive and innovative British-based pharmaceutical industry on the other. The PPRS allows for forward planning by the NHS and also ensures that regional discrepancies are removed. The last three PPRS reviews have seen pricing cuts—the last of which was a 7% price cut in January 2005.

  4.2  The NHS currently spends £7.7 billion on medicines every year; this is only 11.2% of the overall NHS budget (£69 billion). The spend on branded medicines fell by 4.7% in the last year, despite an 4.6% increase in the number of prescriptions issues by doctors. There is a misconception that the UK pays more for prescribed medicines than other European countries. However, if fluctuations in exchange rates and differences in pack sizes, dosage and formulation, tax variations, rebate and discount schemes and wholesalers' margin are taken into account; UK medicine prices move into line with European averages. In fact the UK spends less on medicines per head of the population than the majority of other European countries (approximately £200 a year per person)—mainly because the NHS spends the greater proportion of its money on older, generic medicines.

  4.3  The UK has the lowest take up of new medicines across Europe, which can impact upon patient care. The reasons for this are complex but slow implementation of NICE guidance is increasingly an issue. A recent Audit Commission report (September 2005), found that implementation of NICE guidelines was erratic across the country due to a weakness in financial management and planning. In contrast, between 1993-2003 the USA was the site of first launch for 68% of novel medicines. This is clearly of benefit to US patients who can receive innovative medicines quicker than other patient populations. In addition; as a result of successive PPRS price cuts and the ending of many medicine patents, medicines are 21% cheaper in real terms now than they were 10 years ago. As a result, the UK has been steadily losing ground to the USA in terms of research and development, development of innovative medicines and worldwide sales over the last decade.

  4.4  The UK pharmaceutical industry reinvests over 30% of its sales into research and development of new medicines. Further price cuts would threaten the pharmaceutical industry's ability to research and develop new and innovative medicines in this country. This has been seen in Germany, Italy and Australia where cost containment policies have impacted on the industry's ability to invest in the local economy; leading to job losses and plant closures.

5.  THE VALUE OF MEDICINES

  5.1  There is much evidence to support the cost effectiveness of pharmaceutical medicines, and in fact this is one of the main purposes of NICE. The APG has listed below some examples of the value of medicines for the committee's information. It should be noted that these represent only a few ways in which medicines can provide a cost benefit to the wider community and economy.

Coronary Heart Disease

  5.2  Coronary Heart Disease is currently the biggest killer in the UK for both men and women—more than 105,000 people a year in the UK die as a result of CHD (2004). The majority of these deaths are a result of a heart attack. 230,000 people suffered from a heart attack in 2004; 30% were fatal. CHD accounts for around 3% of all hospital admissions in England.

  5.3  The economic burden of CHD is obviously vast. The costs for treating a heart attack or stroke are extremely expensive and are associated with further costs such as nursing care, and hospital bed usage. CHD costs the healthcare system £3,500 million per year. 79% of this is spent on hospital related care and 16% on buying and dispensing medicine. There are obviously wider cost implications such as working days lost by the patient or their carer. The cost to the UK economy every year due to CHD is £4,400 million.

  5.4  Statins are preventative treatments that reduce cholesterol in the blood; one of the risk factors of CHD. They are used in the primary and secondary prevention of CHD. The NHS currently spends £769 million on statins per year.

  5.5  The number of deaths from CHD in adults under 65 has fallen by over 44% in the last 10 years. The number of hospital admissions for CHD has also fallen. This is in part due to the continued increase in the use of statins—nearly 30 million prescriptions for statins and other cholesterol-lowering medicines are issued annually, almost 17 times the number prescribed ten years previously.

Diabetes

  5.6  Diabetes is a condition in which a patient's blood sugar levels are raised due to insufficient levels of insulin (which regulates sugar in the blood). There are two types of the condition: type 1 where the patient's body is unable to produce insulin and type 2 where the patient's body does not make enough insulin or makes insulin which does not work correctly. About 1.4 million people in the UK are diagnosed with diabetes—80% of those with type 2 and 20% with type 1. However, it is generally believed that up to 1 million additional people in the UK may suffer from undiagnosed type 2 diabetes.

  5.7  The symptoms and complications associated with diabetes can be serious and debilitating including blindness, limb loss and kidney failure. The cost of the disease is a huge burden to the economy. The average reported yearly loss of earnings is £14,000 for a diabetes type 2 patient and £11,000 for their carer. The NHS spends £2 billion on the care of diabetic patients—this is 5% of its budget—and the rate of sickness absenteeism for the diabetic population is 2-3 times higher than the general population.

  5.8  Diabetes is treated by a combination of lifestyle changes and innovative medicines. The management of diabetes with medicines can reduce or delay associated complications. This in turn reduces the need for acute care and provides a saving for the NHS. Proper regulation of blood glucose levels for the current diabetic population, using lifestyle changes and medicines, could save the NHS about 380,000 bed days a year.

Schizophrenia

  5.9  Schizophrenia affects one in one hundred people at some point in their lives—approximately 250,000 people in the UK experience some type of schizophrenic illness. It can be a disabling condition, but for most people a meaningful recovery is a real possibility. The symptoms of schizophrenia are characterized by acute episodes of delusions and hallucinations and long term impairments such as low motivation, suppressed emotions and depression. Violence is often wrongly perceived as a symptom of the condition, whereas a person with schizophrenia is more likely to harm themselves than anyone else and up to 10% of people with schizophrenia take their own lives.

  5.10  Schizophrenia can be effectively managed using psychosocial therapies and drug treatments. In 2002 NICE recommended the use of the newer atypical antipsychotics for people experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia and for those patients experiencing lack of efficacy or side effects with older antipsychotics.

  5.11  Mental health is a key Government health priority. The Wanless report highlighted the greater use of atypical antipsychotics as a key factor in helping to create a world class mental health service. Evidence has shown that atypical antispychotics can significantly reduce relapse and therefore reduce hospitalisation and the expense of costly inpatient treatment. Fewer side effects with atypical antipsychotics may result in better adherence to treatment, enabling patients to remain in the community, be more socially included and possibly return to work.

6.  LOOKING FORWARD

  6.1  NICE is a body which was established to prevent postcode lotteries, enable equal access to medicine across the country and bring cost-effectiveness to the NHS. NICE assesses a medicine's clinical and cost effectiveness and issues guidance on how conditions and illnesses ought to be treated. Much NHS activity is not prone to the same level of scrutiny or assessment and so inefficient practice or management is harder to identify and eradicate. In order to implement changes that will eliminate deficit in the long-term, it is vital that the Government and the NHS looks closely at current practices, in a similar manner to NICE, and stop those which aren't working.

  6.2  The recent demand for Herceptin, an expensive but potentially life-saving breast cancer therapy, from patients with early onset breast cancer, has posed problems for primary care trusts (PCTs) trying to balance their books. The APG recognises that demand for new medicines can present issues for the NHS and member companies are working to manage the entry of such medicines into the NHS through budget models and other tools. Ring fencing money for future innovative medicines, may also help to ensure that a sudden demand for a new medicine can be met.

  6.3  In the examples given previously the APG has demonstrated the value of medicines and the cost benefits they can provide. There are already three systems in place to ensure the efficient use of medicines in the NHS. A further cut in medicines spending is a short-term solution that will cause greater problems long-term. Improving access to the best medicines will serve to reduce demands for expensive secondary care. Encouraging a fair return for the cost of developing new innovative therapies will serve to ensure medicine advances that could pave the way for better public health, a lesser need for recourse to hospital care and the balancing of NHS books

Jennifer Mitchell

American Pharmaceutical Group

6 June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 3 July 2006