Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by the British Beer and Pub Association (SP37)

  The British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) represents brewing companies and their pub interests, and pub owning companies, accounting for 98% of beer production and just over half of the 60,000 pubs in the UK.

  This is a very important issue for our sector and the wider hospitality industry, and we are keen to work towards finding the right solutions that can be implemented over an appropriate period of time.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

General

    —  We would support Government action which takes a staged approach to smoking in public places, for example along the following lines:

      —  By end of 2007: No smoking at the bar in all licensed premises.

      —  By end of 2007: No smoking in back of house areas (eg staff rooms, offices etc) in all licensed premises.

      —  By end of 2009/Spring Summer 2010: Our preferred options would be for the trading floor space in pubs to become predominantly no smoking, with either areas of the premises specifically designated for customers who smoke or smoking rooms where practicable.

    —  We believe that this proposed Industry Approach is preferable to the proposed exemption for pubs which do not serve food, since it will reduce the exposure of employees and customers to environmental tobacco smoke in all pubs.

Timetable

    —  It is essential that the timetable is sufficient to enable the pub sector to manage change effectively. This will also ensure the full support of licensees and staff, and the re-education and co-operation of customers. We therefore suggest that the timetable runs to 2009-2010, rather than 2008. We believe that Spring/Summer would be the most appropriate time for the law to come into effect.

Membership Clubs

    —  In the interests of fair competition and a level playing field for business and employees, it is also crucial that the same rules are applied to all licensed premises, including membership clubs.

Definition of Smoking

    —  In order to avoid any confusion for both customers and business, and in the interests of clear enforcement, we believe it would be appropriate not to allow any form of smoking to take place in those premises where it would be prohibited by law.

Definition of "Enclosed"

    —  It is very important that the definition of "enclosed areas" does not affect what are essentially outdoor areas, such as patios, pavement areas etc, which do not form part of the fabric of the main premises structure. We believe that the acceptance by customers of the ban on smoking in Ireland has been due in part to the continued availability of choice made possible by flexible, outdoor structures.

Definition of "Prepare and Serve Food"

    —  The Association does not believe that food is the best basis for an exemption for licensed premises. It is highly likely that a significant number of pubs could sacrifice food, in order to retain the majority of their customers. According to the BBPA/ALMR Smoking Survey, we estimate that in the region of 34% of pubs in our sample alone may be smoking throughout under the Government proposals.

    —  We do not see how the protection of staff can be best achieved by the creation of "smoking pubs" under proposed exemption, despite ongoing industry action to ban smoking at the bar.

    —  The industry is extremely concerned about any potential adverse impact on binge drinking (as highlighted in paragraph 41 of the consultation document), and believes that allowing customers to drink without being able to provide an appropriate choice of food would be irresponsible.

    —  Any definition of food will create arbitrary distinctions which could be confusing for the general public, who will be uncertain as to whether they can smoke in a pub or not. This in turn will have implications for enforcement. We have nevertheless responded to the Government's request for views on such a definition in our enclosed response.

Signage

    —  Rather than imposing signage on the overwhelming majority of premises which will be smoke-free, we suggest that a more sensible approach would be to require smoking areas to be clearly signed.

    —  We do not see the need for the size and content of signs to be prescribed by regulation.

Offences and Penalties

    —  We suggest that all three fines for the breaches outlined should be the same. As an alternative to discretionary fines, consideration could also be given to fixed penalty notices.

Enforcement

    —  Enforcement of the law with respect to individuals who break it will be key to the success of the new legislation. The actual practicalities of this aspect of enforcement need some further thought. Further discussion on enforcement issues between the parties concerned, including employers across both the public and private sectors, would be helpful.

No Smoking at the Bar

    —  The Association supports no smoking at the bar and believes there is an argument for appropriate regulation in this area, in the form of a general principle in law supported by guidance.

Potential Adverse Effect on Binge Drinking

    —  The industry takes its social responsibilities very seriously and does not wish to see its work in this area undermined. Any potential adverse impact on binge drinking as a result of these proposals on smoking must be avoided. Clearly, the risk of exacerbating binge drinking exists where Government's no food exemption is adopted.

Health Inequalities

    —  While we cannot say for sure whether health inequalities will be exacerbated as a result of the proposed Government exemption for premises not serving food, they are unlikely to be improved or addressed by this approach.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 19 October 2005