Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140 - 141)

THURSDAY 9 MARCH 2006

MR BERNARD RIBEIRO, MR SIMON KELLY, PROFESSOR JANET HUSBAND, DR PETER SIMPSON AND MR IAN LESLIE

  Q140  Chairman: I am very grateful to you for writing the report! To say that while we are in the first witness session is commendable! Just to finish this session, and I would like to go across the piece on this one with all of you, what would be the one thing that you would add to Phase 2, if that is what you were doing, and I know Phase 2 is on its way now, and what would you take away from Phase 2, or from Phase 1, as it were?

  Mr Ribeiro: When I went to the Trafford centre, the Greater Manchester centre, I did a rather unusual thing which was I officially opened an ISTC centre and cut the ribbon, and in my opening speech I said to the CEO, Dr Eduard Lotz, that I would hope that in five years' time this splendid hospital would be part and parcel of the NHS.

  Professor Husband: I would take away additionality completely and add in clinical radiology leadership for the programme to be integrated.

  Mr Leslie: I would echo that it should be incorporated in the NHS and, in the meantime, quality assurance of the work being done needs to be absolute.

  Dr Simpson: I think we should be grateful that effectively we are being provided with ring-fenced surgical beds, which is what it is, but they must be integrated into the NHS plan and pattern of work.

  Mr Kelly: I would support everything that my colleagues have said, and I think it is absolutely vital that there must be clinical leadership in discussions with the Department which have been sadly lacking in the earlier phases. This is necessary and it has to be done by specialty and also by locality. It is probably also worth bearing in mind that none of the advisers at the National Implementation Team have much, if any, clinical background. Most of them are independent consultants, many from management consultancy agencies, and there is also a danger that they tell senior policy people and ministers what they want to hear. The voice of the College may sometimes tell people what they do not want to hear, but it is a voice that needs to be heard. The Colleges have been here for a long time, and will be here for a long time, and patient and public safety and training is our underlying bedrock.

  Q141  Chairman: Could I thank you all very much indeed for this session. I am sure it is going to be very useful when we come to make our recommendations to Government in this area.

  Mr Ribeiro: On our behalf may we thank you for your civility and kindness to us during today's meeting.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 July 2006